Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal of Counseling Education, discusses about
1. Guidance and Counseling
2. Counseling services
3. Media and Technology and Information in Counseling
4. Techniques of Counseling
5. Islamic Counseling
6. Psychology of Education
(Guidance and Counseling setting) either in Educational institution or out of educational institution


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

JKP (Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan) is a scientific publication, so only scientific manuscripts are accepted and have never been published. The policies in the review process in Jurnal Humanitas are as follows:

  1. The review process involves writers, editors, section editors, and reviewers.
  2. The review process is carried out using double-blind peer review. The identity of the reviewer and author is hidden from the reviewer and vice versa.
  3. The editor first checks each submitted article to see if it follows the focus, scope, and guidelines and checks for plagiarism.
  4. Two reviewers will review the article to ensure the quality of the article from the title, abstract, discussion, and conclusion.
  5. Articles go through a review process for six weeks with the criteria for evaluating the manuscript as stated in the Article Assessment Form for reviewers.
  6. The reviewer explains the novelty and contribution of the article to scientific discussion.
  7. Reviewers provide feedback on whether the article deserves to be accepted, rejected, and needs minor or major revisions.


Publication Frequency

JKP (Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan) is published twice a year, the first publication will be in June and the second publication in December. Each issue will be published around 5-10 articles.


Open Access Policy

JKP (Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan) provides open access to everyone so that the information and findings in the articles are helpful for everyone. JKP (Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan) can be accessed and downloaded for free, free of charge. For articles that are used as reference material in article writing or otherwise, you must quote and mention the name of the author of the article in the article created.


Publication Ethics

JKP (Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan) is a journal published by the Program Study Guidance and Counseling Faculty of Science Education Universitas Hamzanwadi is committed to upholding the ethical standards of publication and taking all actions taken against any malpractice of publications. Editors in chief are responsible for preventing any malpractice of publications, non-acceptance of unethical behavior, and cannot tolerate plagiarism. The author who submits or submits an article to this journal must certify that the article is genuine and its status is not being submitted in any journal for publication. Authors, reviewers, and editors in this journal must be fully committed to good publication and accept the responsibility to fulfill their duties following the code of ethics in Core Practices (COPE), which can be accessed through the https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Guidelines

Part 1: Publications and Authorship

  1. All manuscripts submitted must go through a rigorous peer-review process by reviewers who are experts in a particular field of manuscripts.
  2. The review process is carried out with double-blind peer review.
  3. The factors considered in the review are relevance, novelty, significance, originality (authenticity), readability, and language.
  4. Decisions included in this journal are acceptance, acceptance by revision, or rejection (reject).
  5. If the author is encouraged to revise and resubmit the submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected manuscripts will not be reviewed.
  7. Acceptance of manuscripts is limited by applicable legal requirements related to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
  8. No study can be included in more than one publication.

Part 2: Author's Responsibilities

  1. The author must state that the previous manuscript or article has never been published elsewhere.
  2. The author must state that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
  3. Authors must participate in the peer-review process.
  4. The author is obliged to provide revocation or correction of the error.
  5. All authors mentioned in the manuscript must have a significant contribution to the research.
  6. The author must state that all the data in the paper are authentic.
  7. The author must notify the editor of any conflict of interest.
  8. Authors must identify all the sources used in the creation of their manuscripts.
  9. Authors must report any errors in their published papers to the editor.

Section 3: Reviewer's Responsibilities

  1. The reviewer must maintain the confidentiality of all information regarding the manuscript and treat it as necessary information.
  2. The review should be carried out objectively, without personal criticism of the author.
  3. Reviewers should clearly express their views with supporting arguments.
  4. The reviewer must identify the published relevant work that the author has not cited.
  5. Reviewers should also call the Editor in Chief's attention to any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript and other published papers they are personally aware of.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competition, collaboration, or other relationships or connections with any author, company, or institution associated with the article.

Section 4: Editor's Responsibilities

  1. Editors have the full responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. The editor is responsible for the content and quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of writers and readers when trying to improve publications.
  4. Editors must guarantee the quality of the paper and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish corrected pages or make corrections when necessary.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of the source of research funding.
  7. Editors should base their decisions only on the paper's importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to the publication's scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions or overturn previous editors' decisions without serious reason.
  9. Editors should maintain the anonymity of the reviewer.
  10. Editors must ensure that all research materials they publish comply with nationally and internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept the article if they are sure enough.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect a violation, whether the article is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable efforts to persist in obtaining a resolution of the problem.
  13. Editors should accept articles based on suspicion; they must have evidence of misconduct.
  14. Editors may not allow any conflict of interest between the assistant editor, the author, the reviewer, and the editorial board members.


Screening Plagiarism

Editors will run a plagiarism check using Ithenticate or Turnitin for submitted articles before submitting them to reviewers. If an article has more than 20% plagiarized content based on the inspection results, we will send the paper back to the author for revision. The editor will reject the manuscript if the article has more than 50% plagiarized content.


Indexing Sites

Google Scholar


Onesarch Indonesia