Investigating Interpersonal Meaning-Making in Indonesian EFL Learners' Writing: A Systemic Functional Perspective

Authors

  • Yasinda Kania Afsari Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Murti Ayu Wijayanti Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Dhafid Wahyu Utomo Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i2.3922

Keywords:

interpersonal meaning, systemic functional linguistics, analytical exposition text

Abstract

This study presents an investigation of interpersonal meaning-making in students’ writing analytical exposition text. The objectives of this study are to describe the common mood types and to describe modality realization used in the text. Nine texts from 144 texts were collected to analyze. The theories from Systemic Functional Linguistics are adapted as the framework to analyze the clause of the text. The findings of this study showed that students have used mood types which can be seen in the use of subject and finite as mood elements, and the use of predicator, adjunct, and complement as residue. The arrangement of mood element ad residue shows the mood type they used. Regarding to SFL theories, the common mood type in this study is declarative as its function of analytical exposition text to discuss topic critically and deeply from one point of view. The result showed that students have attempted to provide information in the text. In the terms of modality, the median modality has a higher frequency in this text than that of high modality and low modality. It indicates that the students have an effort to position themselves and build the relationship to the reader in the text. Moreover, the zero frequency of low modality shows that the students did not provide opportunities for readers to doubt their position in the text. In conclusion, problem –solving approach as the pedagogical implication is appropriate for students to improve cognitive aspects in terms of communicative skills, so students have been able to create the effective analytical exposition text which is intended to discuss something critically from one point of view.

References

Alraimi, L. M., & Abdalla, A. Y. (2019). Interpersonal Meaning in Media texts Written by Native & Non-native Writers of English. International Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v11i1.14370

Ayoola, & Olusanya, M. (2013). An Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of Some Selected Political Advertisements in Some Nigerian Newspapers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(8), 165–178.

Bankole, merey adenike, & Ayoola, M. O. (2014). Mood and Modality in Christian Magazines: A Systemic Functional Analysis of Christian Women Mirror. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(14), 138–149.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27–40.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Newbury Park: Sage Publication.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Rresearch: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Derewianka, B. (2004). Exploring New Text Works. Rozelle: Primary English Teacher Association.

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Method in Applied Linguistics. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Printer Publisher, Ltd.

Emilia, Emi. (2014). Introducing Functinal Grammar. Pustaka Jaya: Bandung

Feng, H., & Liu, Y. (2010). Analysis of Interpersonal Meaning in Public Speeches—A Case Study of Obama’s Speech. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 825–829. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.6.825-829

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Gerd Stabler.

Halliday, M. A.K . (1976). System and Function in Language (G. Kress (ed.)). Oxford University Pers.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). Spoken and Writen Language. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). Part A of Language, Context, and Text:Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. Burwood, Melbourne: Deakin University.

Halliday, M. A.K . (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. (2002). On Grammar. London: Continuum

Lin, K. H. (2011). An Analysis of Public Speech on the Interpersonal Metafunction of Systemic Functional Linguistics - Three Examles of Barack Obama’s Speeches. National Pingtung IInstItute of Commerce.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Rresearch and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage P

Sukma, B. P., & Utomo, D. W. (2016). Interpersonal Metadiscourse in the Jakarta Post E-News Opinion Articles. Jurnal BEBASAN Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan, 3(1), 17-27.

Taping, M. G., Juniardi, Y., & Utomo, D. W. (2017). Rhetorical Devices in Hillary Clinton Concession Speech. Journal of English Language Studies, 2(2).

Yang, H. (2017). The Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of Barack Obamas’ Inaugural Adress. International Journal of Languages, Literature, and Lingustics, 3, 27–30.

Yuliana, D., & Imperiani, E. D. A. (2017). The realization of interpersonal meaning in course newsletters: A systemic functional linguistic perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6873

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-10-28