Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini)

Authors

  • La Hewi Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Muh Shaleh Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/goldenage.v4i01.2018

Keywords:

PISA Results, Quality PAUD

Abstract


Abstract  

 

The results of the program for international student assessment (PISA) in 2018 in the category of reading ability, Indonesia ranked 74th out of 79 countries, while for the assessment of mathematical ability and scientific ability, Indonesia ranked 73rd and 71st out of 79 participating countries PISA Achievement of Indonesia's ranking in the PISA assessment has always been constant since the beginning of Indonesia's participation in the assessment from 2000 to 2018. With consistent results that are ranked below bring the consequence of thinking that the quality of Indonesian education is not in accordance with global community standards and below the countries other in the world. Government efforts to make improvements to the results of the PISA assessment are changes in the curriculum, but in reality the results of PISA have not experienced significant changes. This paper is an effort to provide a view on the improvement of PISA results through improving the quality of early childhood education, among others for several reasons, first, the opinions of experts based on the results of their research which found that the development of intellectual abilities reached 80% at an early age so the term which is often used is the golden age (golden age); second, all indicators in the program for international student assessment (PISA) begin to be studied and developed by children in early childhood education institutions ranging from literacy reading (language), mathematical literacy and scientific literacy to be the focus in early childhood learning in institutions PAUD is holistically integrative; third, PAUD access which has not yet covered the whole territory of the Republic of Indonesia, as well as the quality and quality of early childhood education institutions that have not been maximized.

 

References

Aditomo, Anindito dan Felicia, N. (2019). Ketimpangan Mutu dan Akses Pendidikan di Indonesia: Potret Berdasarkan Survei PISA 2015. Kilas Pendidikan, 17, 1–8.

Aulina, C. N. (2012). Pengaruh permainan dan penguasaan kosakata terhadap kemampuan membaca permulaan anak usia 5-6 tahun. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(2), 131–144.

Charmila, N., Zulkardi, Z., & Darmawijoyo, D. (2016). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA menggunakan Konteks Jambi. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 198-207.

Fauziddin, M. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Matematika Anak Usia Dini melalui Permainan Jam Pintar di Taman Kanak-Kanak Pembina Kec. Bangkinang Kota. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 1(1), 49–54.

Hafizhah, H. (2019). Mendikbud Nadiem: Hasil PISA untuk Perbaikan Kedepan. Republika.Co.Id, 1.

Hapsari, M. N., Ilhami, B. S., & Agustina, Y. (2019). Dekak-Dekak Geometri, Media Pembelajaran Untuk Mengenalkan Bentuk Geometri Pada Anak Kelompok A. Jurnal Golden Age, 3(01), 30-36.

Hasyim, S. L. (2018). Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Dalam Perspektif Islam,. Jurnal Lentera: Kajian Keagamaan, Keilmuan Dan Teknologi, 1(2), 212–221.

Hewi, L. (2020). Komersialisasi Lembaga Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini di Kota Kendari. Smart PAUD, 3(1), 1–9.

Ibrahim, D. S. M., Aswasulasikin, A., & Hidayatullah, M. (2019). Bahan Ajar Berhitung Cepat Dengan Aplikasi Game Adobe Flash Untuk Pembelajaran Matematika Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal DIDIKA: Wahana Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 86-93.

Imaduddin, M. (2017, May). Mendesain Ulang Pembelajaran Sains Anak Usia Dini Yang Konstuktif Melalui Steam Project-Based Learning Yang Bernuansa Islami. In Proceedings of Annual Conference for Muslim Scholars (No. Seri 2, pp. 950-958).

Permen Dikbud Nomor 137 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 1 (2014).

KEMENDIKBUD. (2019). Arah Baru dalam Pengembangan Pendidikan.

Maryatun, I. B. (2016). Peran Pendidik PAUD dalam Membangun Karakter Anak. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 5(1), 747–752.

Morrison, G. S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar PAUD. PT. indeks.

Nahdi, K., & Yunitasari, D. (2019). Inside-outside circle: An early childhood language and literacy development method. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(6), 325–335.

OECD. (2018). PISA Result in Focus.

OECD. (2019). Programme for International Student Assesment.

Pratiwi, I. (2019). Efek Program PISA Terhadap Kurikulum di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 51–71.

Puspendik. (2019). PISA. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud.

Qudsyi, H. (2010). Optimalisasi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Melalui Pembelajaran yang Bebasis Perkembangan Otak. Buletin Psikologi, 18(2), 91–99.

Ramdhani, S., Yuliastri, N. A., Sari, S. D., & Hasriah, S. (2019). Penanaman Nilai-Nilai Karakter melalui Kegiatan Storytelling dengan Menggunakan Cerita Rakyat Sasak pada Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 3(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v3i1.108

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 60 Tahun 2013 tentang Pengembangan Anak Usia Dini Holistik-Integratif, 1 (2013).

Sari, Y. (2012). Peningkatan Kemampuan Sains Anak Usia Dini Melalui Metode Demonstrasi Di Taman Kanak-Kanak Tri Bina Payakumbuh. Jurnal Ilmiah Pesona PAUD, 1(5).

Schleicher, A. (2018). PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations.

Suyadi dan Ulfah, M. (2013). Konsep Dasar PAUD. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wardhani, D. K. (2017). Peran Guru Dalam Menerapkan Pembelajaran Matematika Yang Menyenangkan Bagi Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Paud Agapedia, 1(2), 153-159.

Yuliani Nurani, S. (2012). Konsep Dasar Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Cetakan Kelima. 1–40.

Published

2020-06-30