REKOGNISI MISKONSEPSI ANAK USIA DINI PADA KONSEP GIZI UNTUK TUMBUH KEMBANG ANAK

Authors

  • Ifa aristia sandra ekayati UNiversitas PGRI Ronggolawe
  • dwi imam efendi

Keywords:

Miskonsepsi, three tier diagnstic test, dan gizi tumbuh kembang

Abstract

Untuk mengetahui miskonsepsi mahasiswa terkait dengan konsep gizi untuk tubuh kembang anak melalui three-tier diagnostic test dengan model pembelajaran inkuiri merupakan tujuan dari penelitia ini. Dalam penelitian tersebut, miskonsepsi ditentukan melalui soal test pilihan ganda yang disertai dengan alasan jawaban dan lapisan ketiga ada kepastian jawaban. Partisipan yang digunakan berjumlah 35 mahasiswa pada tahun jaran 2019/2020. Dalam perangkat pengumpulan data, mahasiswa diminta mengerjakan soal three tier diagnostic test, analisis data menggunakan komputasi. Hasil analisis tes menunjukkan beberapa mahasiswa mengalami miskonsepsi pada konsep gizi untuk tumbuh kembang anak.

References

Araújo, J. L., Morais, C., & Paiva, J. C. (2021). Student participation in a coastal water quality citizen science project and its contribution to the conceptual and procedural learning of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.

BouJaoude, S. B. (1991). A study of the nature of students’ understandings about the concept of burning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 689–704.

Brown, D. E., & Clement, J. (1987). Misconceptions concerning Newton’s law of action and reaction: The underestimated importance of the third law. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar: A Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mechanics, 3, 39–53.

Butts, B., & Smith, R. (1987). HSC chemistry students’ understanding of the structure and properties of molecular and ionic compounds. Research in Science Education, 17(1), 192–201.

Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and application of a three‐tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939–961.

Chewoh, F., & Sarwanto, S. M. (2021). Diagnostic Test Misconception of the Sun in Elementary School.

Djoa, D. D., Sunyono, S., Maydiantoro, A., & Puja Kesuma, T. A. R. (2021). The eXe Learning as a solution to the problem of the three phenomena of chemistry learning stages: A Literature Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 15, 167–175.

Eaton, J. F., Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1984). Students’ misconceptions interfere with science learning: Case studies of fifth-grade students. The Elementary School Journal, 84(4), 365–379.

Ekayati, I. A. S., & Efendi, D. I. (2018). PROFIL PRAKONSEPSI MAHASISWA PADA KONSEP PENGENALAN WARNA PADA ANAK USIA DINI. Prosiding SNasPPM, 3(1), 96–99.

Ekayati, I. A. S., & Efendi, D. I. (2019). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Modified Inquiry pada Konsep Pengenalan Warna Anak Usia Dini. Tarbiyatuna: Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 1–10.

Escuza Mesías, C. D., Flores Morales, J. A., Huamani, L. N., & Núñez Lira, L. A. (2021). Body kinesthetic activity in basic level children’s learning.

Fynn, W. R. (2021). Playing to Learn and Learning to Play in Urban Early Childhood Education. California State University, Long Beach.

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Haryono, H. E., & Aini, K. N. (2021). Diagnosis misconceptions of junior high school in Lamongan on the heat concept using the three-tier test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 12002.

Hirsch, L. S., & O’Donnell, A. M. (2001). Representativeness in statistical reasoning: Identifying and assessing misconceptions. Journal of Statistics Education, 9(2).

Jatmiko, B., & Yonata, B. (2021). The Diagnosis of Misconception on The Concept of Acid-Base Theory in Prospective Teacher Students Used a Three-Tier Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1), 12061.

Laeli, C. M. H. (2021). Development of Three Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test to Identify Misconception and Improve Critical Thinking Skill in Science Learning. Ilkogretim Online, 20(2).

Lengkong, M., Istiyono, E., Rampean, B. A. O., Tumanggor, A. M. R., & Nirmala, M. F. T. (2021). Development of Two-Tier Test Instruments to Detect Student’s Physics Misconception. 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020), 561–566.

Maluccio, J. A., Hoddinott, J., Behrman, J. R., Martorell, R., Quisumbing, A. R., & Stein, A. D. (2009). The impact of improving nutrition during early childhood on education among Guatemalan adults. The Economic Journal, 119(537), 734–763.

Mellyzar, M. (2021). Analysis of Students Understanding of Chemical Bonds Concept Using Three Tier Multiple Choice. Journal of Educational Chemistry (JEC), 3(1).

Meutia, I., Maulidiansyah, D., & Istiyono, E. (2021). Identifying the Drawbacks of the Problem-Solving Skills by Using a Three-Tier Diagnostic Test with Google Form Assistant. 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 483–488.

Moodley, K., & Gaigher, E. (2019). Teaching electric circuits: Teachers’ perceptions and learners’ misconceptions. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 73–89.

Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior high school pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: an interview study. Science Education, 62(3), 273–281.

Pan, S. J.-A. (2021). Taiwanese and American graduate students’ misconceptions regarding responsible conduct of research: A cross-national comparison using a two-tier test approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(2), 1–23.

Pinarbasi, T., Sozbilir, M., & Canpolat, N. (2009). Prospective chemistry teachers’ misconceptions about colligative properties: boiling point elevation and freezing point depression. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(4), 273–280.

Pramesti, Y. S., Mahmudi, H., & Setyowidodo, I. (2021). Using three-tier test to diagnose students’ level of understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 12013.

Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997). Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 377–398.

Schmucker, R., Wang, J., Hu, S., & Mitchell, T. M. (2021). Assessing the Knowledge State of Online Students--New Data, New Approaches, Improved Accuracy. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2109.01753.

Stramel, J. (2021). Mathematics Methods for Early Childhood.

Taban, T., & Kiray, S. A. (2021). Determination of Science Teacher Candidates’ Misconceptions on Liquid Pressure with Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–21.

Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and application of a two‐tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283–301.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-03

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Golden Age

Section

Articles

License

 

All writings in this journal are the full responsibility of the author. The Jurnal Golden Age provides open access to benefit anyone for valued information and findings. Jurnal Golden Age can be accessed and downloaded for free, free of charge, in accordance with the creative commons license used. 

 

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Golden Age by Universitas Hamzanwadi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/jga/indexÂ