Pengambilan Keputusan Strategis untuk Pengembangan Model Kota Produktif dan Berdaya Saing yang Berkelanjutan Berbasis TOPSIS

Authors

  • Ririn Andriana Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Mahardhika
  • Leonard Adrie Manafe Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Mahardhika
  • Sri Lestari Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Mahardhika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/jpek.v9i3.32399

Keywords:

Ekonomi Kreatif, Daya Saing Kota, Strategi Pembangunan, TOPSIS, Kolaborasi Triple Helix

Abstract

Transformasi kota berbasis ekonomi kreatif menjadi salah satu strategi penting dalam meningkatkan daya saing dan produktivitas daerah. Namun, tantangan kompleks seperti keterbatasan infrastruktur, akses permodalan, dan keterampilan sumber daya manusia masih menghambat optimalisasi potensi ekonomi kreatif. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pendekatan analitis yang mampu mengidentifikasi prioritas strategi secara objektif dan terukur. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menentukan prioritas strategi pengembangan kota produktif dan berdaya saing berbasis ekonomi kreatif di Kota Malang. Fokus penelitian diarahkan pada pemetaan kriteria strategis dan pemilihan alternatif kebijakan yang paling efektif melalui pendekatan kuantitatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) dengan teknik Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Data diperoleh dari 50 responden yang terdiri atas akademisi, pelaku usaha kreatif, dan aparatur pemerintah daerah. Responden memberikan penilaian terhadap delapan kriteria strategis dan delapan alternatif kebijakan menggunakan skala Likert. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa strategi dengan nilai preferensi tertinggi adalah penguatan kolaborasi triple helix, diikuti oleh pengembangan infrastruktur kreatif dan peningkatan akses pembiayaan. Kesimpulan utama penelitian ini adalah bahwa keberhasilan pengembangan kota berbasis ekonomi kreatif sangat dipengaruhi oleh kolaborasi lintas aktor, sinergi kebijakan, dan penguatan kapasitas sumber daya lokal. Temuan ini memberikan kontribusi bagi pemerintah daerah dalam merumuskan kebijakan prioritas yang terukur dan berbasis bukti. Penelitian ini juga menegaskan pentingnya strategi kolaboratif sebagai katalisator untuk menciptakan ekosistem ekonomi kreatif yang inklusif dan berkelanjutan.

References

Abu-Rayash, A., & Dincer, I. (2023). Development and application of an integrated smart city model. Heliyon, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14347

Abu-Rayash, A., & Dincer, I. (2025). Development of an integrated model for environmentally and economically sustainable and smart cities. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 73, 104096. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2024.104096

Alkhalifa, F. (2024). Readiness for transformation towards smart sustainable city models: residents’ perspective. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-05-2024-0178

Allam, Z., Bibri, S., Chabaud, D., & Moreno, C. (2022). The Theoretical, Practical, and Technological Foundations of the 15-Minute City Model: Proximity and Its Environmental, Social and Economic Benefits for Sustainability. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15166042

Barney, Jay. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Bibri, S. (2021). Data-driven smart sustainable cities of the future: urban computing and intelligence for strategic, short-term, and joined-up planning. Computational Urban Science, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-021-00008-9

Chang, Y., & Feng, L. (2023). Micro Foundation of Cultural and Creative Clusters: The Knowledge-based View. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01177-0

Činčikaitė, R., & Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, I. (2021). An Integrated Competitiveness Assessment of the Baltic Capitals Based on the Principles of Sustainable Development. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13073764

Činčikaitė, R., & Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, I. (2022). An Integrated Assessment of the Competitiveness of a Sustainable City within the Context of the COVID-19 Impact. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137575

Dong, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Cultural and creative industries development on cities: a perspective from urban innovation ecosystems. Environmental Research Communications, 7. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ada5b3

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

Hu, T.-S., Pan, S., & Lin, H. (2021). Development, Innovation, and Circular Stimulation for a Knowledge-Based City: Key Thoughts. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237999

Javanbakht, T. (2025). Optimization of Beverage Formulation with Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. Beverages. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages11020038

Kociuba, D., Sagan, M., & Kociuba, W. (2023). Toward the Smart City Ecosystem Model. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062795

Komasi, H., Zolfani, S., & Nemati, A. (2023). Evaluation of the social-cultural competitiveness of cities based on sustainable development approach. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame06012023k

Kutty, A., Abdella, G., Kucukvar, M., Onat, N., & Bulu, M. (2020). A system thinking approach for harmonizing smart and sustainable city initiatives with United Nations sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2088

Kutty, A., Kucukvar, M., Abdella, G., Bulak, M., & Onat, N. (2022). Sustainability Performance of European Smart Cities: A Novel DEA Approach with Double Frontiers. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103777

Li, B. (2022). Effective energy utilization through economic development for sustainable management in smart cities. Energy Reports, 8, 4975–4987. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.303

Li, H., Yazdi, M., Huang, C.-G., & Peng, W. (2022). A reliable probabilistic risk-based decision-making method: Bayesian Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (B-TOPSIS). Soft Computing, 26(22), 12137–12153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07462-5

Liu, C. Y., Hu, F. Z., & Jeong, J. (2020). Towards inclusive urban development? New knowledge/creative economy and wage inequality in major Chinese cities. Cities, 105, 102385. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2019.06.016

Liu, Z., Liu, Y., & Osmani, M. (2024). Integration of Smart Cities and Building Information Modeling (BIM) for a Sustainability Oriented Business Model to Address Sustainable Development Goals. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051458

Luan, S., & Li, J. (2025). The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment and Environmental Regulation on Urban Sustainable Competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese Cities. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083366

Malangkota.go.id. (2025). Usung Asa Malang Kota Kreatif Dunia 2025. https://malangkota.go.id/2023/10/19/usung-asa-malang-kota-kreatif-dunia-2025/

Ramón‐Canul, L., Margarito-Carrizal, D. L., Limón-Rivera, R., Morales-Carrrera, U. A., Rodríguez-Buenfil, I., Ramírez‐Sucre, M., Cabal‐Prieto, A., Herrera‐Corredor, J., & Ramírez‐Rivera, E. (2020). Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method for the generation of external preference mapping using rapid sensometric techniques. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10959

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937632

Shao, J., & Min, B. (2025). Sustainable development strategies for Smart Cities: Review and development framework. Cities, 158, 105663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105663

Su, Y., & Fan, D. (2022). Smart cities and sustainable development. Regional Studies, 57, 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2106360

Wang, K., Pang, S.-Q., Zhang, F.-Q., Miao, Z., & Sun, H.-P. (2022). The impact assessment of smart city policy on urban green total-factor productivity: Evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106756

Xia, R.-Y., Wei, D., Jiang, H., Ding, Y., Luo, X., & Yin, J. (2024). Research on the coordinated development and convergence characteristics of China’s urban competitiveness and green total factor productivity. Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111954

Downloads

Published

2025-12-14