ANALISIS PERILAKU POLITIK GENERASI MILENIAL DAN Z INDONESIA DALAM VIRTUAL SPHERE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/sosedu.v6i2.22783Keywords:
media sosial, public sphere, virtual sphere, prilaku politik, generasi milenial dan z.Abstract
Quantitatively, penetration of Indonesian internet and social media users has increased sharply in the last two years, because it is ranked third in the world. Social media has become a new form of public sphere which is then called the virtual sphere. Social media as a virtual sphere is used by the millennial and Z generations to respond, criticize and build public opinion related to political issues in Indonesia. This research aims to determine the development of political behavior of the Indonesian millennial and Z generation in the virtual sphere. The theoretical basis used is Jurgen Habermas's public sphere theory and Papacharissi's Virtual Sphere theory. The results of the analysis show that the political behavior of the millennial and Z generations in the virtual sphere is influenced by their respective backgrounds. The behavior of the Indonesian millennial and Z generations tends to be impolite. The younger generation tends to carry out cyberbullying, hate speech, hoaxes and character assassination against parties who have different political views.
References
Adut, A. (2012). A theory of the public sphere. Sociological Theory, 30(4), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112467012
Anshari, F. (2018). Elemen “Tawuran Virtual” Antar Fans Sepakbola Di Indonesia. WACANA, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 17(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v17i1.511
APJII. (2014). Penggunaan Internet Sektor Bisnis 2013. In Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia % Badam Pusat Statistik.
APJII. (2016). Penetrasi & Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia. In Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.
APJII. (2017). Penetrasi & Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia, 2018(31 August 2018), Hasil Survey.
APJII. (2018). Penetrasi & Profil Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia, 1–15.
APJII. (2020a). Laporan Survei Internet APJII 2019-2020. In Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (Vol. 2020).
APJII. (2020b). Laporan Survei Internet APJII 2019 – 2020. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia, 2020, 1–146.
APJII. (2022). Profil Internet Indonesia 2022. Apji.or.Od, June. apji.or.id
Arntsen, H., & Waldrop, A. (2018). Introduction to Special Issue: Qualitative Method/ologies in Development Studies. Forum for Development Studies, 45(2), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2018.1468408
BBC Indonesia. (2020). Pemerintah Indonesia Bayar Influencer Rp90 Miliar untuk sosialisasi kebijakan, “Buang duit yang efektif?” In BBC Indonesia (pp. 1–11).
Bimber, B., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media and Society, 22(4), 700–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980
Broman, T. (1998). The habermasian public sphere and “science in the enlightenment.” History of Science, 36(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539803600201
Çela, E. (2015). Social Media as a New Form of Public Sphere. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 4(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v4i1.p195-200
Dahlberg, L. (2005). The Habermasian public sphere: Taking difference seriously? Theory and Society, 34(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-005-0155-z
Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160
Dowling, R., Lloyd, K., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2018). Qualitative methods III: Experimenting, picturing, sensing. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517730941
Freeman, M. (2016). Modes of thinking for qualitative data analysis. In Modes of Thinking for Qualitative Data Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315516851
Gestrich, A. (2006). The public sphere and the Habermas debate. German History, 24(3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1191/0266355406gh381oa
Govil, N., & Baishya, A. K. (2018). The Bully in the Pulpit: Autocracy, Digital Social Media, and Right-wing Populist Technoculture. Communication, Culture and Critique, 11(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcx001
GWI. (2019). Indonesia Key Digital Behaviour. Gobal Web Index, 1–6.
Habermas, J. (1974). The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1974). New German Critique and Duke University Press, 3(3), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367809195-3
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and The Rationalization of Society (1st ed.). Beacon Press.
Hakim, R. N. (2021). Pemerintah yang Kerap Gunakan Pengaruh Influencer. In Kompas.com (pp. 1–8).
Hamilton, C. (2009). Uncertain citizenship and public deliberation in post-apartheid South Africa. Social Dynamics, 35(2), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533950903116091
Hohendahl, P. (2014). Habermas : Jilrgen " The Public Sphere ". 3(3), 45–48.
Istiqomatul Hayati. (2021). Rating Racket Boys Anjlok setelah Diserang Netizen Indonesia - Seleb Tempo. 18 Juni 2021, 1–3.
Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2018). The Political Significance of Social Media Activity and Social Networks. Political Communication, 35(3), 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1426662
Kemkominfo. (2016). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. UU No. 19 Tahun 2016, 1, 1–31.
Khamis, S., & Sisler, V. (2010). The New Arab Cyberscape Redefining Boundaries and Reconstructing Public Spheres. Annals of the International Communication Association, 34(1), 277–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2010.11679103
Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024
Kominfo RI. (2020). Isu Hoaks Corona Virus (pp. 1–1250). Direktorat Pengendalian Aplikasi Informatika Direktorat Jenderal Aplikasi Informatika Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika.
Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143
Lizsa Egeham. (2020). Istana Sebut Penggunaan Influencer Agar Program Pemerintah Sampai ke Pelosok (pp. 1–3).
Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (2011). Introduction networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information Communication and Society, 14(6), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648
Losifidis, P. (2011). The public sphere, social networks and public service media. Information Communication and Society, 14(5), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2010.514356
Mansell, R. (2010). Commentary Mediating the Public Sphere Democratic Deliberation, Communication Gaps and the Personalization of Politics . Annals of the International Communication Association, 34(1), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2010.11679102
Markell, P. (1976). Contesting Consensus: Rereading Habermas on the Public Sphere. Constellations, 3(3), 240–259.
Mazali, T. (2008). Social Media as a News Public Sphere. Transactions, 44(3), 12–14.
Microsoft. (2021). Civility, safety & interaction online: Indonesia (Issue February).
Misgeld, D. (1984). Critical Theory and Sociological Theory. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 14(April 1984), 97–105.
Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. UTC Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 85654(85654), 1.
Papacharissi, Z. (2020). The Virtual Sphere. The Information Society Reader, 4(1), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203622278-36
Price, E. (2013). Social media and democracy. Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.846296
Rauchfleisch, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Multiple public spheres of Weibo: a typology of forms and potentials of online public spheres in China. Information Communication and Society, 18(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.940364
Rowland, R. C. (2006). Campaign Argument and the Liberal Public Sphere: A Case Study of the Process of Developing Messages in a Congressional Campaign. Argumentation and Advocacy, 42(4), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2006.11821655
Rycroft, A. E. (2007). Young Adults and Virtual Public Spheres : Building A New Political Culture. Master’s Long Project. Retrieved February, 12, 2009.
Siddiqui, S., & Singh, T. (2016). Social Media Its Impact with Positive and Negative Aspects. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 5(2), 71–75. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.7753/ijcatr0502.1006
Surin, K. (2022). 20. The Frankfurt School, the Marxist Tradition, Culture and Critical Thinking: Max Horkheimer (1895-1973), Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979), Theodor Adorno (1903-1969), Jürgen Habermas (1929-). In Modern European Criticism and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626793-021
Transactions, E., & Law, I. T. E. (2011). Freedom House Indonesia (pp. 1–12).
Villa, D. R. (1992). Postmodernism and the Public Sphere. The American Political Science Review, 86(3), 712–721.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All writings in this journal are the full responsibility of the author. SOSIO EDUKASI provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. SOSIO EDUKASI can be accessed free of charge at no cost, following the creative commons license. Authors who publish articles in the SOSIO EDUKASI must comply with the following conditions:
The author retains the copyright and grants the right of first publication with the work licensed simultaneously under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may make additional separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published journal version of the work (for example, posting it to an institution or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, on institutional repositories or websites) before and during the submission process, resulting in a productive exchange and earlier and more extensive citations of the published work.
All articles in this journal are the sole responsibility of the author. SOSIO EDUKASI provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. SOSIO EDUKASI can be accessed and downloaded for free, following the creative commons license.
SOSIO EDUKASI Jurnal Studi Masyarakat dan Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
