RELASI GENDER DALAM PENGELOLAAN TAMBANG EMAS DI DESA PELANGAN

Authors

  • Dewi Astuti Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Ahmad Tohri Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Abdullah Muzakar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/sosedu.v7i2.36872

Keywords:

relasi gender, pembagian kerja, pertambangan emas, keadilan gender, masyarakat Pelangan

Abstract

This study examines gender relations in the management of gold mining in Pelangan Village, Sekotong District, West Lombok Regency. The study aims to identify the division of roles between men and women and analyze the social, economic, health, and environmental impacts of gender relations in mining activities. A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Data were collected through observation, unstructured interviews, and documentation during fieldwork in Pelangan Village in 2024. Informants included village and community figures, male and female miners, and residents involved in or familiar with mining activities. Data were analyzed interactively through data reduction, data display, and conclusion verification, with source triangulation used to strengthen credibility. The findings show a gendered division of labor: men are concentrated in physically demanding and high-risk extraction, transportation, and casting activities, while women are more involved in breaking, processing, grinding, and other supporting activities. This division creates functional interdependence but also produces differences in remuneration, access to decision-making, and control over mining income. Mining has improved household income, enabled spending on housing, vehicles, and education, and opened economic opportunities for women. At the same time, workers face occupational health and safety risks, while mercury-related processing and unmanaged waste contribute to environmental pressures. The study argues that functional complementarity should not automatically be equated with gender equality; fair access to resources, information, income, safety, and decision-making remains necessary.

References

Benediktha Kikky. (2020). Pemberdayaan perempuan Dayak Banyadu melalui kearifan lokal kuma untuk mendukung ekonomi keluarga.

Avid, A., Irwandi, I., et al. (2021). UMKM, kesetaraan gender, dan pemberdayaan perempuan di Indonesia.

Ardhanariswari, R., & Marwah, S. (2018). Analisis gender terhadap peran perempuan perajin batik Gumelem dalam pelestarian warisan budaya dan pemenuhan ekonomi keluarga.

Devira, D., et al. (2020). Curahan tenaga kerja wanita dan kontribusi pendapatan tenaga kerja wanita sebagai buruh pada industri kacang intip.

Dondo, S. M. (2021). Dampak sosial pengelolaan tambang emas di Desa Bakan Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow. JAP, 7, 63–72.

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075

Jannah, M., & Faiqoh, E. (2021). Keadilan gender dan kesetaraan dalam kehidupan sosial.

Kuper, A. (1996). Anthropology and anthropologists: The modern British school. Routledge.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (1998). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Puspitawati, H. (2020). Gender dan keluarga: Konsep dan realitas di Indonesia.

Rahayu, D. P. (2021). Eksistensi pertambangan rakyat pasca pemberlakuan perubahan undang-undang tentang pertambangan mineral dan batubara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(3), 337–353.

Sabariah, S. N. (2024). Membangun perilaku masyarakat sekitar tambang emas dalam mencegah penggunaan merkuri pada penggelondong emas di daerah wisata Sekotong, 6(2), 243–254.

Sarvasti. (2020). Konsep gender sebagai konstruksi sosial.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

UNESCO. (2003). Gender mainstreaming implementation framework. UNESCO.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Astuti, D., Tohri, A., & Muzakar, A. (2024). RELASI GENDER DALAM PENGELOLAAN TAMBANG EMAS DI DESA PELANGAN . SOSIO EDUKASI Jurnal Studi Masyarakat Dan Pendidikan, 7(2), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.29408/sosedu.v7i2.36872