Penggunaan Model PBL Berpendekatan STEM dalam Pembelajaran IPA Fisika Terhadap Kreativitas Peserta Didik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/kpj.v6i2.6852Keywords:
PBL, STEM, creativityAbstract
This research aims to: (1) To find out whether there is an influence on the use of the Problem Based Learning model with STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) in learning Physics Science on the creativity of students. (2) To find out how the Problem Based Learning model is adjacent to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) in learning Science physics to the creativity of students. This research belongs to the type of experimental research. This research is a quantitative study that uses a pure experimental method (true experimentation) and uses a pretest-posttest control group design. The research was conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Mojot tengah with samples of class VII C as an experimental class and class VII A as a control class. There are 20 multiple-choice test questions and 20 learning creativity questionnaire items used to collect data. The data analysis technique uses the initial ability similarity test, normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis test (two samples t-test).The results showed that: (1) There is an influence on the use of the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Problem Based Learning model in physics science learning on the creativity of students, this can be seen from the results of the hypothesis test (t-test), namely the tcount = 4,947 and ttable = 1,999. Because tcount > ttable, it has an effect. (2) Problem Based Learning model learning with STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) proximity implemented in the experimental class has an influence on the creativity of students. Learning provides examples of activities and problems in everyday life, relates to the subject matter and uses an integrated approach between science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, and finds ways to overcome problems creatively
References
Agustina, D., Kaniawati, I., & Suwarma, I. R. (2017). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering And Mathematics) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Control Of Variable Siswa Smp Pada Hukum Pascal. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal), 6, 35.
Anonim. Elementary Education Science Teaching. Diakses 8 Oktober, 2019. http://educationdegreesource.com/free_info
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi. (p. 85, 100, 226). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Fatmawiyati, Jati. Telaah Kreativitas. (p. 2, 5-6). Magister Psikologi Universitas Airlangga.
Gunadi, Wiyoga Surya dan Titik Handayani Rahayu. (2020). Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam untuk SMP/MTs Kelas VII. (p. 70-77). Wonosobo: CV. Media Pendidikan.
Hallstrom, J., Schonborn, K.J. (2019). Models and Modelling For Authentic STEM Education: Reinforcing The Argument. IJ STEM, 6(22), 1.
Herak, R., & Lamanepa, G. H. (2019). Meningkatkan Kreatifitas Siswa Melalui STEM Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Increasing Student Creativity Through STEM in Science Learning. EduMatSains: Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika Dan Sains, 4(1), 94.
Herlina, Lina dan Rangga Bhakty Iskandar. (2020). Modul pembelajaran Terbuka IPA Kelas VII (Modul 4 Suhu dan Kalor serta Mekanisme Menjaga Kestabilan Tubuh). (p. 13-14). Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pendidkan Menengah Direktorat Sekolah Menegah Pertama.
Heryati, Yeti, dkk. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Pendidikan. (p. 1, 166). Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Khaeroningtyas, N., Permanasari, A., & Hamidah, I. (2016). STEM Learning in Material of Temperature and Its Change to Improve Scientific Literacy Of Junior High School. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 94.
Khairiyah, Nida’ul. (2019). Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). (p. 31-42, 54-68, 77). Medan: Guepedia.
Komalasari, Kokom. (2013). Pembelajaran Kontekstual, Konsep dan Aplikasi. (p. 2). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Lutfi, L., Azis, A. A., & Ismail, I. (2018). Pengaruh Project Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM Terhadap Literasi Sains, Kreativitas dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. In Seminar Nasional Biologi. (p. 192).
OECD, PISA 2018 Result, Country Note, I-III, 3.
Rowland, A.A., Dounas-Frazer, D.R., Ríos, L. et al. (2019). Using The Life Grid Interview Technique in STEM Education Research. IJ STEM , 6(32), 94.
Sastradi, T. (2016). Hakikat Belajar dan Pembelajaran Fisika. Diunduh 12 Oktober, 2019. http://mediafunia.blogspot.com/2016/hakikat-belajar-dan-pembelajaran-fisika.html
Sidiq, Zulkifli. Konsep dan Pengukuran Kreativitas. Diunduh 21 Oktober, 2019. http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FIP/
Sugihartono, dkk. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. (p. 14). Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. (p. 61, 117, 118, 148). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Statistika untuk Penelitian. (84). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutrisno. (2006). Fisika dan Pembelajarannya. (p. 1-2). Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Wahab, Gusnarib dan Rosnawati,. (2021). Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. (p. 21-32). Indramayu: CV. Adanu Abimata.
Warsono, dkk. (2016). Pembelajaran Aktif, Teori dan Asesmen. (p. 150-152). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Widodo, Wahono, dkk. (2016). Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam SMP/MTs Kelas VII Semester. (p. 136). Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemdikbud.
Winarni, Juniati, et al. (2016). STEM: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1(2), 978.
Wisudawati, Asih Widi, dkk. (2014). Metodologi Pembelajaran IPA. (p. 88, 106). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara