Kerangka Penilaian Kapasitas Intelektual dalam Tata Kelola Risiko Banjir Studi Kasus Kabupaten Pidie
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/geodika.v10i1.33637Keywords:
kerangka penilaian, risiko banjir, kapasitas intelektual, Kabupaten PidieAbstract
Banjir masih menjadi permasalahan serius di Kabupaten Pidie, Provinsi Aceh, Indonesia. Terdapat 17 dari 23 kecamatan teridentifikasi sebagai wilayah rawan banjir. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai kapasitas tata kelola dalam pengelolaan risiko banjir di Kabupaten Pidie dengan fokus pada dimensi kapasitas intelektual. Penilaian dilakukan menggunakan kerangka asesmen terstruktur dengan mengevaluasi 12 indikator yang dikelompokkan ke dalam tiga fase pengelolaan banjir, yaitu pra-banjir (resist), saat banjir (absorb dan recover), dan pasca-banjir (adapt). Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan wawancara dengan empat instansi pemerintah utama, yaitu BPBD, PUPR, BAPPEDA, dan SETDAKAB. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kapasitas intelektual tata kelola banjir di Kabupaten Pidie berada pada tingkat sedang, dengan kinerja yang relatif lebih baik pada fase tanggap darurat, namun masih lemah pada aspek kesiapsiagaan dan adaptasi pasca-banjir. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa asesmen kapasitas tata kelola tidak hanya berfungsi untuk menggambarkan kondisi eksisting, tetapi juga sebagai alat diagnostik untuk mengidentifikasi kesenjangan kelembagaan dan mengarahkan upaya perbaikan di masa mendatang.
References
Adger, W. N., Hughes, T. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Rockstrom, J. (2005). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309(5737), 1036-1039.
Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Biswas, R., Jana, A., Arya, K., & Ramamritham, K. (2019). A Good-Governance Framework for Urban Management. Journal of Urban Management, 8(2), 225–236.
BNPB. (2023). Data dan Informasi Kebencanaan Bulanan Teraktual. Infobencana, 5(11),1-19.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research Desing: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (Vol. 54). United State of America: Sage Publications.
Dalkir, K., Wiseman, E., Shulha, M., & McIntyre, S. (2007). An intellectual capital evaluation approach in a government organization. Management Decision, 45(9), 1497-1509.
Dan, L. (2011). A Fuzzy Method for Evaluating the Ability of Knowledge Governance Managers. 2011 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2, 169–172.
Dang, T. K. P., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., & Arts, B. (2016). A framework for assessing governance capacity: An illustration from Vietnam's forestry reforms. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(6), 1154-1174.
DFID. (2011). Defining Disaster Resilience: A DFID Approach Paper. London: Departement for International Development.
Disse, M., Johnson, T. G., Leandro, J., & Hartmann, T. (2020). Exploring the relation between flood risk management and flood resilience. Water Security, 9, 100059.
Dollery, B., Crase, L., & Grant, B. (2011). The local capacity, local community and local governance dimensions of sustainability in Australian local government. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 8(9), 162–183.
Driessen, P. P. J., Hegger, D. L. T., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., Crabbé, A., Larrue, C., Matczak, P., Pettersson, M., Priest, S., & Suykens, C. (2018). Governance strategies for improving flood resilience in the face of climate change. Water, 10(11), 1595.
Hall, J. W., Dawson, R. J., Sayers, P. B., Rosu, C., Chatterton, J. B., & Deakin, R. (2003, September). A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water and Maritime Engineering (Vol. 156, No. 3, pp. 235-247). Thomas Telford Ltd.
Handmer, J. W., & Dovers, S. R. (1996). A typology of resilience: rethinking institutions for sustainable development. Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly, 9(4), 482-511.
Hartley, K., & Zhang, J. (2017). Measuring policy capacity through governance indices. Policy Capacity and Governance: Assessing Governmental Competences and Capabilities in Theory and Practice, 67-97.
Hollyer, J. R., Anheier, H. K., Haber, M., & Kayser, M. A. (2018). Measuring Governance. Governance Indicators: Approaches, Progress, Promise, 103.
Hölscher, K., Frantzeskaki, N., & Loorbach, D. (2019). Steering transformations under climate change: capacities for transformative climate governance and the case of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Regional Environmental Change, 19(3), 791-805.
Juhola, S., & Kruse, S. (2015). A Framework for Analysing Regional Adaptive Capacity Assessments: Challenges for Methodology and Policy Making. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(1), 99-120.
Khakee, A. (2002). Assessing Institutional Capital Building in a Local Agenda 21 Process in Go teborg. Planning Theory & Practice, 3(1), 53-68.
Kim, R. S., Kang, M., Kim, Y., & Lee, H.-Y. (2018). New Development: Unified Scores of Governance Capacity using a Bayesian Latent Variable Analysis. Public Money & Management, 38(7), 527–530.
Koop, S., Monteiro Gomes, F., Schoot, L., Dieperink, C., Driessen, P., & Van Leeuwen, K. (2018). Assessing the Capacity to Govern Flood Risk in Cities and The Role of Contextual Factors. Sustainability, 10(8), 2869.
Laeni, N., Brink, M. V. D., Busscher, T., Ovink, H., & Arts, J. (2020). Building local institutional capacities for urban flood adaptation: Lessons from the water as leverage program in Semarang, Indonesia. Sustainability, 12(23), 10104.
Molnar, E. (2020). Natural Disaster Recovery: a preliminary analysis of 21st century relief funding in natural disasters and its relation to long-term recovery outcomes.
Munaretto, S., Siciliano, G., & Turvani, M. E. (2014). Integrating adaptive governance and participatory multicriteria methods: a framework for climate adaptation governance. Ecology and Society, 19(2).
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-Level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354-365.
Permana, Y. (2012). An Assessment of Local Government Capacity in Managing Flood (Case study: Municipality of Cirebon, West Java, Indonesia) (Doctoral dissertation).
Rana, I. A., Asim, M., Aslam, A. B., & Jamshed, A. (2021). Disaster management cycle and its application for flood risk reduction in urban areas of Pakistan. Urban Climate, 38, 100893.
Sullivan, G. M., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Likert-type Scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541.
Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 341-363.
Tingsanchali, T. (2012). Urban Flood Disaster Management. Procedia Engineering, 32, 25-37.
UNISDR. (2005). ‘The Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015 Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters (Hyogo Framework)’, in World Conference on Disaster Reduction.
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Naurah Nazifa, Tri Mulyani Sunarharum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
