Explanation of the Importance of Trainer Instructions in Training Programs

Authors

  • Rahmat Rahmat IKIP PGRI Kalimantan Timur
  • Andi Temmassonge IKIP PGRI East Kalimantan
  • Muhamad Rohadi IKIP PGRI East Kalimantan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/porkes.v8i3.33772

Keywords:

Coach instructions; training program; athlete performance; motivation

Abstract

Background Coaches play a crucial role in guiding athletes to reach their full potential through effective communication and instruction. The quality and clarity of coach instruction significantly impact athletes' understanding of the training program, their motivation, and overall performance outcomes. Objectives This study aimed to explore the importance of coach instruction in training programs and examine how instructional strategies contribute to athletes' achievement of training goals. This study also identified key factors influencing the effectiveness of coach instruction, including the ability to convey information clearly, provide individualized guidance, and enhance athlete motivation. Methods This study used a quantitative descriptive design by collecting and analyzing descriptive data. A total of 146 athletes participated in this study. Data were obtained using a questionnaire distributed through Google Forms. A quantitative descriptive method was used to identify factors influencing the effectiveness of coach instruction and to describe patterns and trends in the collected data. Results The findings showed that 62.5% of athletes agreed and 31.3% strongly agreed that the coach successfully delivered the training program, while 6.3% disagreed and none strongly disagreed. Similarly, regarding the coach's delivery of instructions, 62.5% agreed, 31.3% strongly agreed, 6.3% disagreed, and 0% strongly disagreed. However, when the coach gave very strict instructions, 37.5% agreed, 12.5% ​​strongly agreed, 43.8% disagreed, and 6.3% strongly disagreed, indicating mixed perceptions of an overly rigid coaching style.            Research shows that clear and supportive coaching instructions have a positive impact on athlete performance and motivation. However, overly strict coaching instructions can reduce athlete effectiveness and satisfaction. Coaches must balance firmness and encouragement to optimize training outcomes.

References

Amaro, N., Monteiro, D., Rodrigues, F., Matos, R., Jacinto, M., Cavaco, B., Jorge, S., & Antunes, R. (2023). Task-Involving Motivational Climate and Enjoyment in Youth Male Football Athletes: The Mediation Role of Self-Determined Motivation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(4). 1-13https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043044

Bachtiar. (2021). Design and Implementation Strategy of Training Programs. Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 3(2), 132–

133.https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/2479377%0Ahttps://ummaspul.e-journal.id/Edupsycouns/article/view/3028/869

Benish, D., Langdon, J., & Culp, B. (2020). Examination of Novice Coaches' Previous Experience as Athletes: Examples of Autonomy Support and Controlling Behaviors as Influences on Future Coaching Practice. International Sport Coaching Journal. 8(1), 48–61.https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2019-0031

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Corbu, A., Peláez Zuberbühler, M. J., & Salanova, M. (2021). Positive Psychology Micro-Coaching Intervention: Effects on Psychological Capital and Goal-Related Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(February), 1–14.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.566293

Chyung, S.Y., Roberts, K., Swanson, I., & Hankinson, A. (2017). Evidence-based survey design: The use of a midpoint on the Likert scale. Performance Improvement, 56(10), 15–23.https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21727

Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Etikan, I., Musa, SA, & Alkassim, RS (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fernandez, M.E., ten Hoor, G.A., van Lieshout, S., Rodriguez, S.A., Beidas, R.S., Parcel, G., Ruiter, RAC, Markham, C.M., & Kok, G. (2019). Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies. Frontiers in Public Health, 7(Jun), 1–15.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298

Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C.M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Otte, F.W., Davids, K., Millar, S.K., & Klatt, S. (2020). When and How to Provide Feedback and Instructions to Athletes? How Sport Psychology and Pedagogy Insights Can Improve Coaching Interventions to Enhance Self-Regulation in Training. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(July), 1–14.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01444

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge.

Ramdhan, M. (2021). Research methods (AA Effendy (ed.); 1st ed.). Creating a media archipelago.

Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods (2nd Edition). Alfabeta.

Wright, J. P., & Morgan, M. A. (2017). Human capital and crime: A study of educational attainment and incarceration rates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 1-10.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.001

Downloads

Published

2026-01-02

How to Cite

Rahmat, R., Temmassonge, A., & Rohadi, M. (2026). Explanation of the Importance of Trainer Instructions in Training Programs. Jurnal Porkes, 8(3), 778–790. https://doi.org/10.29408/porkes.v8i3.33772