Improving teachers' understanding and Lesson Plan quality through Inquiry Collaborative Learning (ICL)

Authors

  • Baskoro Adi Prayitno Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
  • Sri Widoretno Prodi PBIO FKIP UNS
  • Bowo Sugiharto Prodi PBIO FKIP UNS
  • Chandra Adi Prabowo Prodi PBIO FKIP UNS
  • Dwi Oetomo Prodi PBIO FKIP UNS
  • Muhammad Ilham Faturrahim Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Nur Isna Aprilia Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Elisa Hidayatul Chasanah Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Viana Ismara Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Rahma Eka Kartika Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/ab.v5i2.28062

Keywords:

Inquiry Collaborative Learning, Lesson Plan, Instructional Quality

Abstract

Inquiry Collaborative Learning (ICL) is a learning model based on the scientific method, enhanced by collaborative elements. This model aims to encourage students not only to memorize scientific concepts but also to understand scientific processes and the attitudes of scientists. This activity aimed to evaluate the impact of training, modeling, and mentoring in implementing ICL on teachers' understanding and the quality of ICL-based lesson plans in Ngawi Regency. The program involved 80 participants, comprising 70 teachers from the IPA MGMP and 10 members of the implementing team, representing 13 public and 47 private Islamic junior high schools. The activities were conducted using a blended learning approach, including theoretical training, modeling, online mentoring for lesson plan development, and classroom implementation of ICL. The results showed a significant improvement in teachers' understanding, from 60% before the program to 85% afterward. The quality of lesson plans also improved in terms of setting learning objectives, analyzing the structure and flow of materials, designing active learning-based teaching scenarios, and evaluating the learning process. These findings affirm that ICL-based training, modeling, and mentoring effectively enhance teachers' understanding and skills in implementing scientific process-based teaching

References

Abdi, A. (2014). The Effect of Inquiry-based Learning Method on Students’ Academic Achievement in Science Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020104

Acar Sesen, B., & Tarhan, L. (2013). Inquiry-Based Laboratory Activities in Electrochemistry: High School Students’ Achievements and Attitudes. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9275-9

Derting, T. L., & Ebert-May, D. (2010). Article Learner-Centered Inquiry in Undergraduate Biology: Positive Relationships with Long-Term Student Achievement. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10

Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Instruction on 6th Grade Turkish Students’ Achievement, Science Process Skills, and Attitudes Toward Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942

Nzomo, C., Rugano, P., Njoroge Mungai, J., & Gitonga Muriithi, C. (2023). Inquiry-based learning and students’ self-efficacy in Chemistry among secondary schools in Kenya. Heliyon, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12672

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. In Educational Research Review (Vol. 14, pp. 47–61). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Prayitno, B. A., Corebima, D., Susilo, H., Zubaidah, S., & Ramli, M. (2017). Closing the science process skills gap between students with high and low level academic achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2).

Prayitno, B. A., & Suciati. (2017). Narrowing the gap of science students’ learning outcomes through INSTAD strategy. New Educational Review, 50(4). https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.50.4.10

Prayitno, B. A., Suciati, & Titikusumawati, E. (2018). Enhancing students’ higher order thinking skills in science through instad strategy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.1046

Probosari, R. M., Widyastuti, F., Sajidan, S., Suranto, S., & Prayitno, B. A. (2019). Improving scientific argumentation: Opportunities and barriers analysis in inquiry-based scientific reading. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032005

Putra, B. K. B., Prayitno, B. A., & Maridi. (2018). The effectiveness of guided inquiry and instad towards students’ critical thinking skills on circulatory system materials. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.14302

Published

2024-12-29