Konstruk Keterlibatan Siswa Pada Proses Pembelajaran Di Kelas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/edc.v20i1.26765Keywords:
Keterlibatan, Pembelajaran, siswaAbstract
The aim of this research is to parse and understand the construct of student involvement in the learning process in the classroom so that it can improve the quality of education. Definitions, dimensions, measurements, and factors that can support engagement are discussed in this study. Involvement is an important issue that cannot be ignored because of the large influence it has on increasing student achievement and self-development. Engaged students have a certain level of participation and persistence in the learning process, exert effort in class assignments, and show varying levels of interest, motivation, and enjoyment for learning (Fredricks et al., 2004). On the other hand, a disengaged learner is a learner who is bored and anxious or sometimes annoyed to participate in class and performs poorly in various subjects. The method used is qualitative research with descriptive analysis of social phenomena and literature review as reference material for this writing. The results of this research are that student involvement is the time, energy and all action efforts devoted by students in the learning process in class for the purpose of self-development and mastery of knowledge. Engagement has 3 dimensions, namely behavioral, emotional and cognitive. Factors that influence student engagement in class such as teacher support, motivation, and school climate have been widely researched and are recognized as having a significant influence on student engagement in class. The measurement of the student engagement scale is presented for further research material in quantitative form.
References
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Appleton, L. (2020). Academic Libraries and Student Engagement: A Literature Review. In New Review of Academic Librarianship (Vol. 26, Issues 2–4, pp. 189–213). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1784762
Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320500074915
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J. S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement Potential of The Concept. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00346543074001059
Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A Measure of College Student Course Engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
Jia, J. L., Nguyen, B., Mills, D. E., Polin, D. J., & Sarin, K. Y. (2020). Comparing online engagement and academic impact of dermatology research: An Altmetric Attention Score and PlumX Metrics analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 83(2), 648–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.003
Lewis, C. W., & Middleton, V. (2003). African americans in community colleges: A review of research reported in the community college journal of research and practice: 1990-2000. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27(9–10), 787–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/713838284
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Newmann, F. M. (1996). Authentic Assessment in Social Studies: Standards and Examples. Handbook of Classroom Assessment, 1995, 359–380. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780125541558500144
Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and Contextual Associations Between Teacher–Student Relationships and Student Engagement: A Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
Wang, Q., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2009). The motivational landscape of early adolescence in the united states and china: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 80(4), 1272–1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01331.x
Wu, Y., & Kang, X. (n.d.). Relationship between Teacher support and Learning Engagement in EFL Context: The Mediating Role of Achievement Emotions. International Journal of Education and Humanities (IJEH), 3(1), 85–98. http://i-jeh.com/index.php/ijeh/index
Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. D. (2016). Adding Value : Learning Communities and Student Engagement Author ( s ): Chun-Mei Zhao and George D . Kuh Source : Research in Higher Education , Vol . 45 , No . 2 , AIR Forum Issue ( Mar ., 2004 ), pp . Published by : Springer Stable URL : http://www.jst. 45(2), 115–138.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2003). Undang-undang nomor 20 tahun 2003, tentang sistem pendidikan nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Friday, 21 June 2023. International Education Database. Retrieved from https://worldtop20.org/education-database/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sustia Ningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
