Analisis Kompetensi Siswa Dalam Ilmu Robotika Menggunakan Mixed Methods

Authors

  • Taufik Akbar Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Jagat Sugiantara Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Arnila Sandi Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Martua Hamonangan Nasution Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Ari Satriadi Universitas Hamzanwadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/jit.v8i1.28449

Keywords:

Robotics Training, Technical and Analytical Skills, Industrial Revolution 4.0, Mixed Methods, SMK NWDI Renco

Abstract

His study aims to evaluate the impact of robotics training on the technical and analytical skills of students at SMK NWDI Renco. The background of this research is based on the importance of developing technical and analytical skills in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0, where technology and automation have become integral parts of various industrial sectors. Vocational education at the high school level plays a strategic role in preparing a competent and adaptive workforce to meet technological advancements.The research method used is a mixed-method approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. An experimental design was implemented with pre-test and post-test evaluations to measure changes in students' technical and analytical skills before and after the robotics training. Quantitative data were collected through specially developed technical and analytical skill tests, while qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with students and teachers involved in the training.

The robotics training program was conducted over eight weeks, covering topics such as the fundamentals of robotics, programming, and practical applications through small-scale projects. Participants were purposively sampled and consisted of 30 eleventh-grade students from SMK NWDI Renco. A pre-test was conducted prior to the training to assess the students' baseline skills. During the training, direct observations were made to document students’ progress, and activities were documented. A post-test was conducted after the training to evaluate changes in technical and analytical skills. The results of the study showed a significant improvement in students’ understanding and skills. The average pre-test score was 63.2, while the average post-test score increased to 84.5. Specifically, the improvements included a 41.7% increase in the understanding of robotics concepts, a 35.4% improvement in microcontroller utilization, and a 24.6% improvement in sensor and actuator applications.

References

KEMENDIKBUD, “Menyiapkan Generasi Bangsa Hadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0,” jendela.kemdikbud.go.id, 2024. https://jendela.kemdikbud.go.id/v2/fokus/detail/menyiapkan-generasi-bangsa-hadapi-revolusi-industri-4-0

M. T. Dwi Putra, D. Pradeka, A. Adiwilaga, M. Munawir, and D. P. Adjhi, “Pelatihan Robotika Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kompetensi Keahlian Siswa SMK Daarut Tauhiid Bandung,” J. Pengabdi. UNDIKMA, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 56, 2023, doi: 10.33394/jpu.v4i1.6516.

R. Arifudin, A. Setiawan, Z. Abidin, D. A. Efrilianda, and J. Jumanto, “Pembelajaran STEM Berbasis Robotika Sederhana Bagi Guru Sekolah Dasar di Karimunjawa,” Abdimasku J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 570, 2022, doi: 10.33633/ja.v5i3.825.

H. Soebhakti et al., “Improving STEM Capability of Islamic Boarding School Students in Batam Through Robotics Training,” Engagem. J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 424–436, 2023, doi: 10.29062/engagement.v7i1.1350.

et al., “Smart Project Educational Robot (SpaceR) Sebagai Robot Edukasi,” J. Apl. dan Inov. Iptek, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2021, doi: 10.52232/jasintek.v3i1.63.

M. Chevalier, C. Giang, A. Piatti, and F. Mondada, “Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: a model for creative computational problem solving,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00238-z.

S. Ramdan1 et al., “Optimalisasi SDM Melalui Penerapan Pendidikan Otomasi Industri dan Robotika di SMK,” J. Ilm. Multidisiplin, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 2986–6340, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7951427

E. I. Agustin, R. T. Yunardi, and W. Winarno, “Line Follower Robot Training and Introduction of Internet of Things (IoT) for Students in Jombang City,” Darmabakti Cendekia J. Community Serv. Engag., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 50, 2019, doi: 10.20473/dc.v1.i2.2019.50-55.

M. A. Novianta and B. Firman, “Pelatihan Robot Line Follower Analog bagi Siswa SMK TKM Teknik Purworejo,” Dharma Bakti, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021.

I. Gunawan and I. Fathurrahman, “Prototipe Robot Pemantau Suhu Dalam Zona Kebakaran Gedung Menggunakan Telemetri Jaringan Nirkabel,” Infotek J. Inform. dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 107–114, 2018, doi: 10.29408/jit.v1i2.904.

UNMAHA, “Penerapan Robotika dalam Pendidikan: Menyiapkan Generasi Masa Depan,” blog.unmaha.ac.id, 2023. https://blog.unmaha.ac.id/penerapan-robotika-dalam-pendidikan-menyiapkan-generasi-masa-depan/

ADMIN, “SMK Lebih Mudah Adopsi Kurikulum Merdeka,” www.vokasi.kemdikbud.go.id, 2022. https://www.vokasi.kemdikbud.go.id/read/b/smk-lebih-mudah-adopsi-kurikulum-merdeka

G. Nugent, B. Barker, N. Grandgenett, and V. I. Adamchuk, “Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 391–408, 2010, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782557.

D. E. Subroto, Supriandi, R. Wirawan, and A. Y. Rukmana, “Implementasi Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran di Era Digital: Tantangan dan Peluang bagi Dunia Pendidikan di Indonesia,” J. Pendidik. West Sci., vol. 1, no. 07, pp. 473–480, 2023, doi: 10.58812/jpdws.v1i07.542.

P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar, “Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 3–4. pp. 369–398, 1991. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139.

A. Musgrove, “Preservice Teachers Designing Assistive Educational Robots Using Computational Thinking,” citejournal.org, vol. 24, [Online]. Available: https://citejournal.org/volume-24/issue-2-24/current-practice/preservice-teachers-designing-assistive-educational-robots-using-computational-thinking/

M. Bers, “Blocks to robots : learning with technology in the early childhood classroom,” New York : Teachers College Press, 2008. https://archive.org/details/blockstorobotsle0000bers

S. Al Jannah, “Robotika dalam Pendidikan: Meningkatkan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah, Kreativitas, dan Pemikiran Komputasional Siswa,” edupavilion.com, 2024. https://edupavilion.com/blog/Robotika-dalam-Pendidikan-Meningkatkan-Keterampilan-Pemecahan-Masalah-Kreativitas-dan-Pemikiran-Komputasional-Siswa

S. Samsugi, D. Damayanti, A. Nurkholis, B. Permatasari, A. C. Nugroho, and A. B. Prasetyo, “Internet of Things Untuk Peningkatan Pengetahuan Teknologi Bagi Siswa,” J. Soc. Sci. Technol. Community Serv., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 173–177, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ejurnal Fishbone Diagram,” asq.org. https://asq.org/quality-resources/fishbone.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/JSSTCS/article/view/1380

Aris Sudianto, Lalu Kerta Wijaya, Jumawal Jumawal, and Mahpuz Mahpuz, “Penerapan Aplikasi Warung Media Berbasis Android Guna Meningkatkan Promosi dan Penjualan,” Infotek Jurnal Informatika dan Teknologi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 267–275, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.29408/jit.v7i1.24482.

A. Sudianto, M. Wasil, and M. Mahpuz, “Penerapan Sistem Informasi Geografis dalam Pemetaan Sebaran Kasus Gizi Buruk,” Infotek : Jurnal Informatika dan Teknologi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 142–150, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.29408/jit.v4i2.3559

Downloads

Published

20-01-2025

How to Cite

Taufik Akbar, Jagat Sugiantara, Arnila Sandi, Martua Hamonangan Nasution, & Ari Satriadi. (2025). Analisis Kompetensi Siswa Dalam Ilmu Robotika Menggunakan Mixed Methods. Infotek: Jurnal Informatika Dan Teknologi, 8(1), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.29408/jit.v8i1.28449

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.