Pengajaran Bahasa Berdasarkan Teori Aktivitas Budaya Engeström: Integrasi Konteks Budaya dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa

Authors

  • Hasanuddin Chaer Universitas Mataram
  • Syamsinas Jafar Universitas Mataram
  • Siti Rohana Hariana Intiana Universitas Mataram
  • Januari Rizki Pratama R. Universitas Mataram
  • Irma Setiawan Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v10i2.25562

Abstract

This article presents a language teaching framework for understanding how human activities can be influenced by social and cultural contexts. This is because effective language teaching does not only understand the structure and vocabulary, but also understands the cultural context in which the language is used. To understand this, this research uses Engeström's 'Cultural Historical Activity Theory' with a qualitative descriptive analytical approach method, with several research steps, First: Identifying Data. Second: Collecting Data. Third: Analyzing Data. Fourth: Synthesis and Interpretation. For this reason, the aim of this research is to discuss the importance of cultural aspects in language teaching and how this approach can improve students' language skills and cultural understanding. The findings of this research indicate that Engeström's culturally-based activity theory can enhance communication skills through language teaching within cultural contexts. Consequently, students can serve as a positive force in fostering cross-cultural communication competence.

References

Álvarez Valencia, J. A., & Michelson, K. (2023). A design perspective on intercultural communication in second/foreign language education. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 16(4), 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2022.2066152.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2020). Educator’s guide for addressing cultural awareness, humility, and dexterity in occupational therapy curricula. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74 (Supplement_3), 7413420003p1-7413420003p19. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S3005.

Barili, A., & Byram, M. (2021). Teaching intercultural citizenship through intercultural service learning in world language education. Foreign Language Annals, 54(3), 776-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12526.

Burner, T., & Svendsen, B. (2020). Activity Theory—Lev Vygotsky, Aleksei Leont’ev, Yrjö Engeström. Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory, 311-322. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_21.

Causadias, J. M. (2020). What is culture? Systems of people, places, and practices. Applied Developmental Science, 24(4), 310-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.1789360.

Chaer, H., Rasyad, A., & Sirulhaq, A. (2022). Ontologi Huruf Nun Menuju Titik Semiotik. Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, 12(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.17510/paradigma.v12i2.629.

Chaer, H., Rasyad, A., Sirulhaq, A., & Malik, D. A. (2022). The Trilogy of Linguistic Communication of the Qur’an Surah Al-Kâfirûn. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 16(2), 349-372. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v16i2.6226.

Delgado-Gaitan, C., & Trueba, H. (2022). Crossing cultural borders: Education for immigrant families in America. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003331322.

Engestrom, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960-974. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409143.

Engeström, Y. (2009). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, 1987. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. Learning and expanding with activity theory, 303-328. https://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/ISCARkeyEngestrom.pdf.

Engeström, Y. (2020). Concept formation in the wild: Towards a research agenda. Éducation et didactique, 2, 99-113. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.6816.

Engeström, Y., & Cole, M. (2021). Situated cognition in search of an agenda. In Situated cognition (pp. 301-309). Routledge.

Engeström, Y., & Pyörälä, E. (2021). Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning. Medical teacher, 43(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1795105.

Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2020). Toward a vygotskian perspective on transformative agency for social change. Revisiting Vygotsky for social change: bringing together theory and practice, 87-109.

Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2023). From paralyzing myths to expansive action: Building computer-supported knowledge work into the curriculum from below. In Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 318-324). Routledge.

Engeström, Y., Nuttall, J., & Hopwood, N. (2022). Transformative agency by double stimulation: Advances in theory and methodology. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 30(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1805499.

Fantini, A. E. (2020). Reconceptualizing intercultural communicative competence: A multinational perspective. Research in Comparative and International Education, 15(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499920901948.

Gallagher, A., Daniels, H., Edwards, A., & Engestrom, U. (2010). Activity Theory in Practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies.

Hamza R’boul (2021). North/South imbalances in intercultural communication education. Language and Intercultural Communication, 21(2), 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1866593.

Iswandari, Y. A., & Ardi, P. (2022). Intercultural Communicative Competence in EFL Setting: A Systematic Review. REFLections, 29(2), 361-380. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1359373.

Jakobson, R. (1973). Main Trends in the Science of Language (Routledge Revivals) (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315831947.

Kim, D. (2020). Learning Language, Learning Culture: Teaching Language to the Whole Student. ECNU Review of Education, 3(3), 519-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120936693.

Klyukanov, I.E. (2020). Principles of Intercultural Communication (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429353475.

Köksal, O., & Yürük, N. (2020). The role of translator in intercultural communication. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(1), 327-338. https://ijci.globets.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/375.

Lyashenko, M., & Sitnova, A. (2021). Interconnection of formal, non-formal and informal form of educations as a learning concept. Известия Балтийской государственной академии рыбопромыслового флота: психолого-педагогические науки, 4 (58), 112. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47499919.

Nickerson, C. (2022). Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/cultural-historical-activity-theory.html

Peng, Y. (2024). Reconciling the evolving conceptualisations of language teacher cognition from an activity theory perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2024.2323927.

Postholm, M., & Vennebo, K. (2020). Applying cultural historical activity theory in educational settings. Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780429316838

Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2022). Personal values across cultures. Annual review of psychology, 73, 517-546. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-125100.

Thi Ngu, D., Huong, D. T., Huy, D. T. N., Thanh, P. T., & Dongul, E. S. (2021). Language teaching application to English students at master's grade levels on history and macroeconomic-banking management courses in universities and colleges. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1457-1468. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.221838488236447.

Tohri, A., Rasyad, A., Sururuddin, M., & Istiqlal, L. M. (2022). The Urgency of Sasak Local Wisdom-Based Character Education for Elementary School in East Lombok, Indonesia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 333-344. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1341295.pdf.

Tursunovich, R. I. (2022). Linguistic and Cultural Aspects of Literary Translation and Translation Skills. British Journal of Global Ecology and Sustainable Development, 10, 168-173. https://www.journalzone.org/index.php/bjgesd/article/view/158.

Van Viegen, S., & Zappa-Hollman, S. (2020). Plurilingual pedagogies at the post-secondary level: Possibilities for intentional engagement with students’ diverse linguistic repertoires. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(2), 172-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1686512.

Varghese, J., & Crawford, S. S. (2021). A cultural framework for Indigenous, Local, and Science knowledge systems in ecology and natural resource management. Ecological Monographs, 91(1), e01431. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1431.

Wilkinson, J. (2020). From native speaker to intercultural speaker and beyond: intercultural (communicative) competence in foreign language education. In The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 283-298). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-25

How to Cite

Chaer, H., Jafar, S., Intiana, S. R. H., R., J. R. P., & Setiawan, I. (2024). Pengajaran Bahasa Berdasarkan Teori Aktivitas Budaya Engeström: Integrasi Konteks Budaya dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan Dan Inovator Pendidikan, 10(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v10i2.25562