Pendekatan Pedagogic dan Skema Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan untuk Mempromosikan Kewarganegaraan Ekologi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v10i3.26431Keywords:
civic education; ecological citizenship; pedagogyAbstract
Environmental problems as a world issue require the importance of preparing citizens to have the ability to prevent environmental problems. This research aims to present a study of pedagogical approaches and citizenship education learning schemes in strengthening the integration of ecological citizenship into education as an effort to provide a foundation for citizenship education to develop ecological citizenship in schools. This research uses a comprehensive literature review research method, involving analysis and synthesis of findings from various literature to gain an understanding of the ecological citizenship education learning scheme. The research results show that the pedagogical landscape of ecological citizenship education can be packaged in learning approaches (1) place-based learning; (2) problem-based learning; (3) environmental justice pedagogy; (4) ecological citizenship education; (5) action competency learning; (6) learning to serve; (7) participatory action research; (8) socio-scientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL). the pedagogical approach to ecological citizenship education includes six (6) stages: (1) inquiry; (2) planning action; (3) critical and active involvement; (4) community participation and networking on a scale (local, national, global), (5) maintaining environmental and social change, and (6) evaluation and reflection.
References
Amos, R., Knippels, M. C., & Levinson, R. (2020). Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning: Possibilities and challenges for teacher education. Science teacher education for responsible citizenship: Towards a pedagogy for relevance through socioscientific issues, 41-61.
Barry, J. (2005). Resistance is fertile: From environmental sustainability citizenship. In Environmental citizenship (pp. 21–48). MIT Press.
Bennett, D., Sunderland, N., Bartleet, B.-L., & Power, A. (2016). Implementing and Sustaining Higher Education Service-Learning Initiatives: Revisiting Young et al.’s Organizational Tactics. Journal of Experiential Education, 39(2), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825916629987.
Bourban, M. (2023). Ecological Citizenship. In Handbook of the Anthropocene. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4_168.
Bowers, C. A. (2002). Toward an Eco-justice Pedagogy. Environmental Education Research, 8(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620120109628.
Cruz, J. P., Malafaia, C., Silva, J. E., Rovisco, M., & Menezes, I. (2023). Educating for participatory active citizenship: an example from the ecological activist field. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02866-7.
Effeney, G., & Davis, J. (2013). Education for sustainability: A case study of pre-service primary teachers’ knowledge and efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n5.4.
European Network for Environmental Citizenship (ENEC). (2018). Defining environmental citizenship. Retrieved from http://eneccost.eu/ourapproach/enecenvironmental-citizenship/.
Gadgil, M. (2023). Ecosystem People, Biosphere People, Ecological Refugees. Social Change, 53(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00490857231152416.
Gruenewald, D. A. (2014). Place-based education: Grounding culturally responsive teaching in geographical diversity. In Place based education in the global age (pp. 161–178). New York: Routledge.
Harris, J. (2005). The millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press.
Hayes, E. (2006). Community service-learning in Canada: A scan of the field. Guelph: Canadian Association for Community Service Learning
Hayes, E. (2006). Community service-learning in Canada: A scan of the field. Guelph: Canadian Association for Community Service Learning.
Hedefalk, M., Almqvist, J., & Lidar, M. (2014). Teaching for Action Competence. Sage Open, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014543785.
Jaufar, S. (2021). Shaping of sustainable citizenship among young people of Kulhudhuffushi, Maldives and Hamilton, New Zealand: Context, conditions and experiences. Sustainable Earth, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00040-3.
Johnson, L., & Morris, P. (2010). Towards a framework for critical citizenship education. The Curriculum Journal, 21(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170903560444.
Johnson, L., & Morris, P. (2010). Towards a framework for critical citizenship education. The curriculum journal, 21(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170903560444.
Kahlke R., Taylor A. (2018). Community service-learning in Canada: One size does not fit all. Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v4i1.305.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, R., et al. (2017). Science and society in education. Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning: Connecting formal and informal science education with society. https://www.parrise.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2018/03/parrise-en-rgb.pdf. Last accessed on Jan 15, 2024.
Lievrouw, L. A. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Cambridge: Polity.
Love, G. A. (2003). Practical ecocriticism: Literature, biology, and the environment. University of Virginia Press.
Moore, J. (2005). Barriers and pathways to creating sustainability education programs: policy, rhetoric and reality. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620500169692.
Orman, T. F. (2022). Youth’s everyday environmental citizenship: An analytical framework for studying interpretive agency. Childhood, 29(4), 495-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/09075682221107750.
Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Controversial issues in the science classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(4), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717745544.
Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Korfiatis, K., Hadjichambis, A. Ch., & Arianoutsou, M. (2012). Conservation Reasoning and Proposed Actions for the Protection of Threatened Plant Species: Insights From a Sample of Rural and Urban Children of Cyprus. Society & Natural Resources, 25(9), 868–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.642461.
Parsons, M., Bhor, G., & Crease, R. P. (2024). Everyday youth climate politics and performances of climate citizenship in Aotearoa New Zealand. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 7(3), 1436-1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486231208205.
Revans, R. W. (1998). ABC of action learning: Empowering manages to act and learn from action. London: Tavistock.
Schusler, T. M., & Krasny, M. E. (2015). Science and democracy in youth environmental action-learning “good” thinking. In EcoJustice, citizen science and youth activism situated tensions for science education (pp. 363–384). London: Springer.
Simonneaux, L. (2007). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In Argumentation in science education (pp. 179–199). Dordrecht: Springer.
Smith, A.G. (2007) Place-Based Education: Breaking through the Constraining Regularities of Public School. Environmental Education Research, 13, 189-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620701285180.
Stratford, R. J. (2024). Towards ecological everything-The ecological university, ecological subjectivity and the ecological curriculum. Policy Futures in Education, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103241227005.
Tidball, K. G., & Krasny, M. E. (2010). Urban environmental education from a social-ecological perspective: Conceptual framework for civic ecology education. Cities and the Environment (CATE), 3(1), 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.15365/CATE.31112010.
Vella, F. (1994). Practice‐based learning problem‐based learning applied to medical education: By HG Barrows. pp 145. Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Illinois. 1994. $19.95. Biochemical Education, 22(4), 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-4412(94)90020-5.
Weiss, J. (2020). What is youth political participation? Literature review on youth political participation and political attitudes. Frontiers in Political Science, 2, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.00001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fitriah Artina, Muhammad Amin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings in this journal are the full responsibility of the author. Jurnal Humanitas provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. Jurnal Humanitas can be accessed free of charge at no cost, following the creative commons license. Authors who publish articles in the Jurnal Humanitas must comply with the following conditions:
The author retains the copyright and grants the right of first publication with the work licensed simultaneously under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may make additional separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published journal version of the work (for example, posting it to an institution or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, on institutional repositories or websites) before and during the submission process, resulting in a productive exchange and earlier and more extensive citations of the published work.
All articles in this journal are the sole responsibility of the author. Jurnal Humanitas provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. Jurnal Humanitas can be accessed and downloaded for free, following the creative commons license.
Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
