Perbedaan Karakteristik Makiyah dan Madaniah dalam Perspektif Komunikasi antarbudaya

Authors

  • Ulya Hilalatul Hasbi Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
  • Swandi Yusuf Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
  • Muhammad Sa'i Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
  • Muhammad Habiburrahman Institut Agama Islam Qomarul Huda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v10i4.27101

Keywords:

Makiyah verse; Madaniah verse; intercultural communication

Abstract

This research examines the role of intercultural communication in understanding the context of Qur'anic revelation in the Makkah and Madinah periods. The aim is to analyze the differences in the characteristics of Makiyah and Madaniah verses and the influence of the socio-cultural context on communication patterns and the delivery of revelation. This research uses a literature study research design with a qualitative approach. The research data is in the form of secondary data obtained through data collection techniques using documentation studies from various sources such as tafsir books, Qur'anic literature, and intercultural communication theories. Data analysis was conducted using content analysis and hermeneutic interpretation techniques. The results showed that communication in the Makkah period used a strong and brief language style according to the context of Arab society, while the Medina period was more detailed and explicit. Differences in the socio-cultural context influenced communication strategies, where Makkah focused on strengthening the faith, while Medina on the formation of social systems. Communication channels evolved from oral dominance in Makkah to a combination of oral and written in Medina. This research proves that intercultural communication theory can be used as an analytical framework to understand the dynamics of Qur'anic revelation. This understanding is important for developing contemporary da'wah methods that are adaptive to cultural diversity.

References

Ahmad, S. (2013). Komunikasi Antarbudaya: Satu Perspektif Multi Dimensi. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Al-Shaleh, S. (1997). Mahabit fi Ulum Alquran. Beirut: Dar al-‘alm li al-malayin.

Anwar, M. N., & Harryanto, D. (2020). Komunikasi interpersonal sebagai cara akulturasi budaya imigran Afrika dengan masyarakat lokal di Shelter House Puspa Agro Sidoarjo. PENSA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), 173-183. https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/874.

Aufirandra, F., Adelya, B., & Ulfah, S. (2017). Komunikasi Mempengaruhi Tingkah Laku Individu. JPGI (Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia), 2 (2), 9–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.29210/02219jpgi0005.

Daud, S. (2010). Makkiyah dan Madaniah(Teori Konvensional dan Kontemporer). Dialogia: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial, 8(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v8i1.1280.

Fatimah, S., & Cangara, H. (2016). Pemanfaatan Saluran Komunikasi Dalam Penyerapan Aspirasi Masyarakat Oleh Pusat Pelayanan Informasi Dan Pengaduan (Pindu) Pemerintah Kabupaten Pinrang. KAREBA: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(1), 79-91. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/kareba/article/view/1885.

Hadiyanto, A. (2011). Makkiyyah-Madaniyyah: Upaya Rekonstruksi Peristiwa Pewahyuan. Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an, 7(1), 1-22. https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jsq/article/view/4729.

Heryanti, (2017). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Palembang: Universitas Muhamadiyah Palembang

Husni, M. (2019). Studi Al-Quran: Teori Al Makiyah dan Al Madaniah. Al-Ibrah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keilmuan Islam, 4(2), 68-84.https://www.ejournal.stital.ac.id/index.php/alibrah/article/view/77.

Idri, (2023). Ayat-Ayat Nida’ dalam Al- Quran. Jakarta: Kencana.

Lagu, M. (2016). Komunikasi Antarbudaya di Kalangan Mahasiswa Etnik Papua dan Etnik Manado di Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado. Acta Diurna Komunikasi, 5(3), 1-10. . https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/actadiurnakomunikasi/article/view/12774.

Nilamsari, N. (2014). Memahami studi dokumen dalam penelitian kualitatif. Wacana: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(2), 177-181. https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v13i2.143.

Nurudin, (2019). Ilmu Komunikasi: Ilmiah dan Populer. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Permana, A. K. (2021). Paradigma al-Qur'an Menjawab Realitas Arab Jahiliyah Perspektif Ilmu Sosial Profetik. At-Tatbiq, 6(1), 16-32.

Rafiza, S. N., Masri, D., Alfiansyah, M., Nursina, S., & Fadhillah, U. (2023). MEMAHAMI KARAKTERISTIK AYAT-AYAT MAKIYAH DAN MADANIYYAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF AHLI TAFSIR (Al-Zarkasyi, Jalaluddin Al-Suyuti dan Manna Al-Qaththan). Al-Munqidz: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 11(2), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.52802/al-munqidz.v11i2.550.

Rahmadiningsih, I., Putri, F. S., Fitri, F. Z., & Nafi'Hasbi, M. Z. (2022). Makiyah Dan Madaniyah. Jurnal Al-Mubarak: Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir, 7(1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-mubarak.v7i1.1023.

Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Amin, A. S. (2014). Writing a Literature Review Research Paper: A step-by-step approach. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 3(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijbas.v3n1.298.

Ridwan, R., & Sari, H. (2021). Metode Komunikasi Dakwah Rasulullah (Kajian Tematik dalam Kitab Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim). NUKHBATUL'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam, 7(2), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.36701/nukhbah.v7i2.408.

Sholeh, A. K. (2011). Membandingkan Hermeneutika dengan Ilmu Tafsir. Tsaqafah, 7(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v7i1.106

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

Suyandari, N. (2019). Komunikasi Lintas Budaya. Surabaya: CV. Putra Media.

Yamita, D. M., & Kurnia, K. (2021). Saluran Komunikasi dan Model Penerimaan serta Penggunaan Teknologi pada Sistem Pembayaran Elektronik. Inter Komunika: Jurnal Komunikasi, 6(1), 15-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.33376/ik.v6i1.1019.

Zuchdi, D. (1993). Panduan Penelitian Analisis Konten. Lembaga Penelitian IKIP Yogyakarta.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Hasbi, U. H., Yusuf, S., Sa’i, M., & Habiburrahman, M. (2024). Perbedaan Karakteristik Makiyah dan Madaniah dalam Perspektif Komunikasi antarbudaya . Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan Dan Inovator Pendidikan, 10(4), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v10i4.27101