Representasi Pertemanan Toxic dalam Perspektif Interaksionisme Simbolik (Studi pada Mahasiswa di Kota Malang)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v11i4.32373Keywords:
social symbol, symbolic interactionism, toxic friendship, university studentsAbstract
Toxic friendships among university students are a social phenomenon shaped by symbols and interpretations. This study aims to explore how social symbols are produced, interpreted, and used in the interactions of toxic friendships among students in Malang City. A qualitative approach with a phenomenological method was employed to examine students’ subjective experiences. George Herbert Mead’s theory of symbolic interactionism was adopted as the analytical framework, which emphasizes that meaning emerges through social interaction and individual interpretation. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and participatory observations with students from various universities in Malang. The findings reveal that verbal symbols such as sarcasm, mockery, and ridicule, along with non-verbal symbols such as gaze, gestures, and selective ignoring, play a significant role in shaping toxic patterns of interaction. Students’ interpretations of these symbols are often driven by the desire to maintain group membership and pseudo-solidarity, which perpetuates the toxic dynamics. This study affirms that toxic friendships are a social construction sustained through symbols and interpretations, while also demonstrating the relevance of Mead’s symbolic interactionism in understanding the dynamics of student friendships.
References
Alda, A., & Elsera, M. (2024). Toxic Relationship as Dating Violence: An Examination in the Sociology of Religion. BELIEF: Sociology of Religion Journal, 2(1), 75-82. https://ejournal.uinbukittinggi.ac.id/belief/article/view/8584.
Amin, M., Wajdi, R., & Syukri, S. (2022). Perilaku Komunikasi Toxic Friendship (Studi terhadap Mahasiswa Fisip Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar). Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Organisasi (J-KO), 2(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.26618/jko.v2i2.8074.
Dryburgh, N. S. J., Martin-Storey, A., Craig, W. M., Holfeld, B., & Dirks, M. A. (2025). Quantifying Toxic Friendship: A Preliminary Investigation of a Measure of Victimization in the Friendships of Adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 40(7–8), 1800–1823. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241265418.
Eramian, L., Mallory, P., & Herbert, M. (2024). Friendship, Intimacy, and the Contradictions of Therapy Culture. Cultural Sociology, 18(4), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755231157440.
Esperansa, S. T., Siva, N., Putri Saraswati, I. A., Wisnawa, K. S. C., & Kistian, A. (2023). The Effect of Toxic Friendship on Students’ Mental Health. APLIKATIF: Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.59110/aplikatif.v2i2.124.
Febriani, M. (2024). Perilaku Komunikasi Toxic Friendship Pada Mahasiswa Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam (KPI) Fakultas Dakwah Purwokerto UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto Purwokerto. Skripsi. UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto.
Felmlee, D., & Faris, R. (2016). Toxic Ties: Networks of Friendship, Dating, and Cyber Victimization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516656585.
Fernandi. (2022). Dampak Komunikasi Toxic Friendship Dengan Teman Sebaya Terhadap Prestasi Pendidikan Di Geulanggang Gampong, Bireuen. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry.
Goffman, E. (1949). Presentation of self in everyday life. American Journal of Sociology, 55(1), 6-7. http://educ333b.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/53313682/goffman_intro.pdf.
Hou, Y. (2022). Intergenerational transmission of interpersonal relationship quality in adulthood: Patterns and consequences on well-being within families. Doctoral Dissertation. Purdue University Graduate School. https://doi.org/10.25394/PGS.19929485.
Indriani, N., & Kusuma, R. S. (2022). Interaksi sosial fandom army di media sosial weverse. Jurnal Komunikasi Global, 11(2), 206-226.
Jonathan, A., Alfando, F., & Fransisca, V. (2022). Teman dan persoalan hubungan toxic dalam pandangan etika persahabatan Aristoteles. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 1(1), 45-58. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/praxis/article/view/44.
Laksmi, L. (2017). Teori Interaksionisme Simbolik dalam Kajian Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi. Pustabiblia: Journal of Library and Information Science, 1(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.18326/pustabiblia.v1i2.1-18.
Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619.
Mead, G. H. (1925). The Genesis of the Self and Social Control. The International Journal of Ethics, 35(3), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1086/intejethi.35.3.2377274.
Nakhma’nssolikhah, Kurniawan, F. A., Novianti, C., Sulkhah, S., & Marliani, L. (2023). Kepribadian Toxic People terhadap Kehidupan Era Metaverse. KONSTELASI: Konvergensi Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi, 3(1), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.24002/konstelasi.v3i1.6959.
Rahimah, S., Abidin, M. Z., & Fadhila, M. (2022). The Effect of Toxic Relationships in Friendship on The Psychological Well-Being of Islamic University Students. TAZKIYA Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.15408/tazkiya.v10i2.27776.
Pasya, S. A., Wulandari, H., & Lixia, D. (2024, November). The Communication Behavior in Toxic Friendship of College Students at Universitas Islam Riau. In Proceeding Of International Conference on Communication and Media Digital (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 35-42). https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/icommedig/article/view/19729.
Simarmata, S. W., Batubara, A., & Ulfiani, R. (2023). Pengaruh Toxic Friendship Terhadap Self Esteem Siswa SMPIT Al Falah Kutalimbaru. Al-Irsyad: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 13(2), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.30829/alirsyad.v13i1.17122.
Wibowo, J. P., Kristyanti, Z. M. P., Nugraha, T. F. M., Putri, A. A., Fauziyyah, P., & Abdillah, R. (2025). Dampak Toxic Friendship dan Strategi Antisipasi dalam Pertemanan. SOSPENDIS: Sosiologi Pendidikan dan Pendidikan IPS, 3(1), 134-150. https://lawinsight.net/index.php/SOSPENDIS/article/view/130.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sefia Tripramesti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings in this journal are the full responsibility of the author. Jurnal Humanitas provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. Jurnal Humanitas can be accessed free of charge at no cost, following the creative commons license. Authors who publish articles in the Jurnal Humanitas must comply with the following conditions:
The author retains the copyright and grants the right of first publication with the work licensed simultaneously under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may make additional separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published journal version of the work (for example, posting it to an institution or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, on institutional repositories or websites) before and during the submission process, resulting in a productive exchange and earlier and more extensive citations of the published work.
All articles in this journal are the sole responsibility of the author. Jurnal Humanitas provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. Jurnal Humanitas can be accessed and downloaded for free, following the creative commons license.
Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
