Identifikasi Jebakan Kelompok Miskin Transien di Sumurarum Magelang

Authors

  • Yuni Indarti Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Drajat Tri Kartono Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Haryani Saptaningtyas Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v11i4.32931

Keywords:

empowerment, transient poverty, vulnerability trap

Abstract

The issue of extreme poverty has become a global strategic issue, but ironically, transient poor households are often neglected in poverty alleviation policy schemes. This group, despite their motivation to escape poverty, is highly vulnerable to falling back below the poverty line when shocks occur. This study aims to (1) describe the conditions of transient poor households in Sumurarum Village, Magelang Regency, and (2) identify the causes of transient poverty through a participatory approach. This study uses a qualitative approach with Participatory Action Research (PAR). Data were collected through field observations, in-depth interviews, and Focus Group Discussions involving transient poor households and village officials. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively through reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of the study show that: 1) Transient poor households in Sumurarum Village are in a vulnerability trap, with the following characteristics: a) Marginal welfare, where households are above the poverty line but depend on fluctuating daily wages and have minimal physical assets. b) High vulnerability, where they are exposed to shocks (health, social, program failure) without adequate protection, even more vulnerable than the extremely poor who still receive social assistance. c) Systemic powerlessness, characterized by a lack of access and voice due to the failure of data collection systems and unfair access to programs at the village level. 2) Issues causing transient poverty include: a) Limited human resources (low education and informal employment), b) Inappropriate intervention design (social assistance that only provides a sense of security, not improved welfare), and c) Village institutional inefficiency (information asymmetry and lack of specific empowerment programs).

References

Adawiyah, S. E. (2020). Kemiskinan dan faktor-faktor penyebabnya. KHIDMAT SOSIAL: Journal of Social Work and Social Service, 1(1), 43-50. https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/khidmatsosial/article/view/6336.

Alfitri. (2011). Community Development: Teori dan Aplikasi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Ariansyah, D., Sagita, M., Julia, R. A. (2025). Analisis faktor penyebab ketidakmerataan penyaluran bansos kepada masyarakat miskin. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(10), 394-404. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15482268.

Chambers, R. (2007). Participation and poverty. Development, 50, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100382.

Devereux, S. (2001). Livelihood insecurity and social protection: a re-emerging issue in rural development. Development Policy Review, 19(4), 507-519. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00148.

Djazuli, R. A. (2024). Evaluasi Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. UMG Press.

Filho, W. L., et al. (2022). Transient poverty in a sustainable development context. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(5), 415-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2029612.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder. Universitas Texas.

Fukuyama, F. (2002). Social capital and development: The coming agenda. SAIS Review, 22, 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2002.0009.

Gascon, M., Mcintyre-Mills, J. (2018). Empowering indigenous people: voice, choice and agency in rural development planning in Mindanao. In Balancing Individualism and Collectivism. Springer International Publishing. Australia.

Iswanto, R. J., Yuliasih, E., Aziz, S. A. (2021). Strategi keluar dari jebakan kemiskinan (poverty trap) di Indonesia. In Proseding Seminar Nasional Informatika, (pp. 212-218). UPN Veteran Yogyakarta.

Jalan, J., & Ravallion, M. (1998). Transient poverty in postreform rural China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26(2), 338-357. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.1998.1526.

Khosla, S., Jena, P. R., Rahut, D. B. (2023). Can rural livelihood programs enhance capabilities and reduce vulnerability to poverty? Evidence from a tribal region of eastern India. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.10.018.

Prihatin, R. B. (2024). Fenomena Ketergantungan Terhadap Bantuan Sosial. Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI.

Santoso, D. (2018). Penduduk Miskin Transient: Masalah Kemiskinan yang Terabaikan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sulistiyani, A. T. (2017). Kemitraan dan Model-Model Pemberdayaan. Gava Media.

Sumardjo, S., Firmansyah, A., Dharmawan, L. (2023). Pemberdayaan Urban Farming Pada Masyarakat Peri-Urban sebagai Upaya Pencapaian SDGs. IPB Press.

Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury Academic.

Stringer, E.T. (2007). Action Research. SAGE Publications.

Syata, W. (2024). Efektifitas program bantuan sosial dalam mengurangi kemiskinan. Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research, 2(1), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.32672/mister.v2i1.2486.

Wardana, W. W., Sari, D. W. (2020). Dynamic poverty study: Cronic and transient poverty in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 11(9), 600-622.

Widiastuti, A., Sukmaningrum, M. P. S., Rusgianto, I. Y F. S., & Hady, A. F. (2021). Model Jaring Pengaman Sosial dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam. Airlangga University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02

How to Cite

Indarti, Y., Kartono, D. T., & Saptaningtyas, H. (2025). Identifikasi Jebakan Kelompok Miskin Transien di Sumurarum Magelang. Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan Dan Inovator Pendidikan, 11(4), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v11i4.32931

Issue

Section

Articles