Representasi G30S dalam Buku Teks Sejarah SMA Kurikulum 1994 Terbitan Erlangga Edisi Kedua: Analisis Wacana Kritis Roger Fowler
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v12i2.34629Keywords:
discourse, G30S, textbookAbstract
This study was motivated by the controversy surrounding the narrative of the September 30th Movement (G30S), which during the New Order era was presented in a one-sided manner and tended to vilify the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) through various media, including history textbooks, thereby raising suspicions of ideological bias and political interests in their compilation, even though the publisher was a private company. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyze how the G30S is represented in the textbook “Sejarah Nasional Indonesia dan Umum: Untuk SMU Kelas 3,” published by Erlangga and authored by Badrika in 1997, by examining aspects of vocabulary, grammar, the representation of actors and events, as well as the ideology embedded within it. This aims to uncover the discourse constructions and interests behind the G30S narrative. The method used is qualitative research employing Roger Fowler’s Critical Discourse Analysis model, which focuses on language analysis as a social practice. The results indicate that the use of specific vocabulary and sentence structures creates a negative image of the PKI and a positive image of the military, while simultaneously limiting the reader’s perspective. Furthermore, the G30S events are represented in a linear manner, with the PKI as the primary actor and the military as the savior, without presenting the historical complexities. This discourse also contains New Order ideology that emphasizes the legitimacy of power and the instillation of Pancasila values. In conclusion, the textbook is not neutral but rather a product of discourse.
References
Adam, A. W. (2007). Seabad Kontroversi Sejarah. Ombak.
Adam, A. W. (2018). Beberapa Catatan Tentang Historiografi Gerakan 30 September 1965. Archipel: etudes interdisciplinaires sur le monde insulindien, 95(-), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.4000/archipel.604.
Ahmad, T. A. (2016). Sejarah Kontroversial di Indonesia: Perspektif Pendidikan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Badrika, I. W. (1997). Sejarah Nasional Indonesia dan Umum: Untuk SMU Kelas 3. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Budiono, H., & Awaludin, A. F. (2017). Perkembangan Historiografi Buku Teks Sejarah Di Indonesia Masa Orde Baru Hingga Reformasi. Efektor. https://doi.org/10.29407/e.v4i2.969.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran (Terjemahan). Pustaka Pelajar.
Danu, A. K., & Nesi, A. (2021). Ideologi dalam Wacana Buku Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Terbitan Kemdikbud Edisi Revisi 2017. JURNAL IDEAS: Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, 7(3), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v7i3.359.
Duha, A. M. (2022). Pancasila and Communis: An Ideological Comparison. Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism, 1(2), 391-414. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijpgc.v1i2.59807.
Eriyanto, E. (2011). Analisis Wacana (Pengantar Analisis Teks Media). LKiS Printing Cemerlang.
Filasari, R. & Ayundasari, L. (2020). Wacana Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter dalam Buku Teks Sejarah Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah 9(2), 90-109. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPS.092.01.
Fowler, R. (2020). Linguistic criticism. In The Language and Literature Reader (pp. 49-59). Routledge.
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (2018). Critical linguistics. In Language and control (pp. 185-213). Routledge.
Fowler, R. (2013). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Routledge.
Fowler, R. (1997). Review of Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, by N. Fairclough. Language in Society, 26(3), 421–423. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4168779.
Hidayat, M. M. (2025). "Saya Tidak Mau Mati Sia-Sia": Pengalaman Hidup Mantan Tahanan Politik 1965-1966 di Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesia Journal of Indigenous Psychology, 12(1), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu1148.
Kuntowijoyo, K. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
McGregor, K. E. (2007). History in Uniform: Military Ideology and the Construction of Indonesia's Past. NUS Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muslich, M. (2010). Text Book Writing: Dasar-dasar Pemahaman, Penulisan, dan Pemakaian Buku Teks. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Notosusanto, N., Djamhari, S. A., Ariwiadi, Santoso, R., Wismar, E. B. M., & Marboun, M. (2019). Sejarah Nasional Indonesia Jilid VI: Zaman Jepang dan Zaman Republik. Balai Pustaka.
Pertiwi, H., Putri, S. H., Salwa, D. N., Ariandini, C., & Aurora, P. A. (2023). Pancasila sebagai Ideologi Bangsa Indonesia serta Perkembangan Ideologi Pancasila pada Masa Orde Baru dan Era Reformasi. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hukum, Bisnis, Sains dan Teknologi (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 360-373).
Retnowati, E. (2018). Tatanan Orde Baru: Distorsi Ideologi Pancasila. LIPI Press.
Riyandanu, M. F. (2020). Analisis Wacana Kritis Teks Gerakan 30 September Pada Buku Pelajaran Sejarah Indonesia Kelas XII. Tesis. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.
Roosa, J. (2008). Dalih Pembunuhan Massal: Gerakan 30 September dan Kudeta Suharto. Institut Sejarah Sosial Indonesia dan Hasta Mitra.
Roosa, J., Ratih, A., & Farid, H. (2004). Tahun yang tak Pernah Berakhir: Memahami Pengalaman Korban 65. Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (Elsam).
Saputra, D. T., & Sumarno, S. (2021). Pemberantasan PKI di Kediri (1966-1968). AVATARA: e-Journal Pendidikan Sejarah, 10(2), 1-8. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/avatara/article/view/38738.
Sari, K. (2021). Ideologi dan Kurikulum. Cantrik Pustaka.
Susanto, H., Fatmawati, S., & Fathurrahman, F. (2022). Analisis Pola Narasi Sejarah dalam Buku Teks Lintas Kurikulum di Indonesia. Fajar Historia: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah dan Pendidikan, 6(2), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.29408/fhs.v6i2.6632.
Syahputra, M. A. D. S., & Mahdiana, N. (2019). Analysis of History Textbooks Based on Benedict Anderson's Approach. Historika, 22. https://doi.org/10.20961/historika.v22i2.37962.
Tati, A. (2015). Kurikulum Pendidikan di SD dan SMA Pada Masa Orde Baru. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 4(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPS.042.09.
Taum, Y. Y. (2014). Bahasa, Wacana, dan Kekuasaan dalam Konstruksi G30S. In International Seminar Language Maintenance and Shiff IV. Universitas Diponegoro.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (1995). Lima Puluh Tahun Pembangunan Pendidikan Nasional 1945-1995 (Suatu Analisis Kebijakan). Grasindo.
Wardaya, M. K. (2010). Keadilan Bagi yang Berbeda Paham: Rekonsiliasi dan Keadilan Bagi Korban Tragedi 1965. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 22(1), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16211.
Widiatmoko, S., & Awaludin, A. F. (2017). Pemaknaan Ulang Terhadap Peringatantrage di Nasional 65 dan Upaya Rekonsiliasi di Tingkat Daerah. Efektor, 4(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.29407/e.v4i2.971.
Widyawati, D., Nindiati, D. S., & Syafarudin, N. (2025). Analisis Nilai-Nilai Dalam Isu Sejarah Kontroversi Pada Buku Teks Sejarah Kelas XII Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan (JKIP), 6(2), 473-479. https://doi.org/10.55583/jkip.v6i2.1371.
Yamin, M. (2020). Menggugat Pendidikan Indonesia: Belajar dari Paulo Freire dan Ki Hajar Dewantara. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Zanynu, M. A. (2019). Soeharto dan Gerakan 30 September (G30S) dalam Narasi Memori Media Berita Daring Indonesia. Inter Komunika: Jurnal Komunikasi, 4(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.33376/ik.v4i1.287.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alvina Cherisa Damayanti, Yuliati Yuliati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings in this journal are the full responsibility of the author. Jurnal Humanitas provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. Jurnal Humanitas can be accessed free of charge at no cost, following the creative commons license. Authors who publish articles in the Jurnal Humanitas must comply with the following conditions:
The author retains the copyright and grants the right of first publication with the work licensed simultaneously under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may make additional separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published journal version of the work (for example, posting it to an institution or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, on institutional repositories or websites) before and during the submission process, resulting in a productive exchange and earlier and more extensive citations of the published work.
All articles in this journal are the sole responsibility of the author. Jurnal Humanitas provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. Jurnal Humanitas can be accessed and downloaded for free, following the creative commons license.
Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
