Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Kolaboratif dan Self-Efficacy pada Pembelajaran IPS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v12i3.34941Keywords:
collaborative skills, self-efficacy, social studies learning, STADAbstract
This research is motivated by the low level of collaborative skills and self-efficacy of students in social studies learning due to the dominance of conventional methods that are not aligned with the multidimensional and interpretive epistemology of social studies. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) cooperative learning model in improving students' collaborative skills and self-efficacy in social studies learning, specifically on the topic of Social Conflict and Integration. This study employed a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design. The population was eighth-grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Sidoarjo, with two classes selected using purposive sampling: an experimental class (n=37) using the STAD model and a control class (n=37) using a simple cooperative model. The research instruments included a collaborative skills observation sheet and a self-efficacy questionnaire that had been validated. Data analysis techniques used the Independent Sample T-Test and N-Gain test. The results showed that the STAD model was significantly more effective than the simple cooperative model. The mean post-test score for collaborative skills in the experimental class (78.00) was higher than that of the control class (75.11), with a significance value of 0.000 (p<0.05). The mean post-test score for self-efficacy in the experimental class (87.11) was also much higher than that of the control class (69.46) (p<0.05). The N-Gain test confirmed the effectiveness of the STAD model in the moderate to high category for both variables. This study concludes that the integration of the STAD cooperative learning model is effective in simultaneously improving students' collaborative skills and self-efficacy. It provides a theoretical contribution to the development of learning models based on social and cognitive constructivism, as well as a practical contribution for social studies teachers in implementing innovative 21st-century learning.
References
Bandura, A. (2018a). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (2018b). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280
Barr, R. D., Barth, J. L., & Shermis, S. S. (2021). Defining the social studies. National Council for the Social Studies.
Bloom, B. S. (2010). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2021). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. Teachers College Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575020.2020.1773658
Fatimah, S., & Rahman, A. (2024). Implementasi Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) untuk Meningkatkan Kerja Sama dan Kepercayaan Diri Siswa. Indonesian Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 145–158.
Golding, C. (2019). Getting started with collaborative inquiry in the social sciences. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(4).
Haliliah. (2015). Keefektifan Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) dalam Pembelajaran IPS untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kognitif dan Keterampilan Sosial Siswa MTs Negeri 1 Masbagik, Lombok Timur. Society, 8(2), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.20414/society.v8i2.1503.
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2020). What is scaffolding? In J. Hammond (Ed.), Scaffolding: Teaching and learning in language and literacy education. Primary English Teaching Association Australia.
Jackson, L. D. (2019). Revisiting adult learning theory through the lens of an adult learner. Adult Learning, 30(4), 145–152.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on excellence in college teaching, 25(3&4).
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Joyce, B., W. M., & C. E. (2019). Models of teaching. Pearson.
Kemendikbudristek. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 57 Tahun 2021 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Kemendikbudristek.
Komalasari, K., & Dakhi, O. (2020). The impact of Jigsaw cooperative learning on social studies learning outcomes and social attitudes. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(3), 1–15. https://www.jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/1234.
Kurniawan, D. (2023). Pengaruh Cooperative Learning terhadap Self-Efficacy dan Hasil Belajar IPS Terpadu. Social Studies Education Journal, 12(1), 45–56.
Lockwood, D. (2021). Solidarity and schism: “The problem of disorder” in Durkheimian and Marxist sociology. Oxford University Press.
Mukuka, A., M. V., & B. S. (2021). Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy on the Relationship between Instruction and Students’ Mathematical Reasoning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 73–92. https://jme.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/3732.
Nabila, D. S., Handayanto, S. K., & Susilo, W. H. (2024). Studi kasus keterampilan sosial: Komunikasi siswa dalam pembelajaran kooperatif dan kolaboratif. Jurnal Integrasi dan Harmoni Inovatif Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 1(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.17977/um063v4i9p8.
Nuangjamnong, W. (2022). The effects of cooperative learning (STAD & Jigsaw II) on Thai high school students’ group cohesiveness, self-efficacy, and self-determination. Thesis. Thammasat University.
OECD. (2019). Effective policies, successful schools. PISA 2018 results (Volume V). https://doi.org/10.1787/ca768d40-en.
Prayogi, S., Sukaisih, R., Muhali, M., & Asy’ari, M. (2024). Dampak Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD terhadap Keterampilan Kolaborasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Fisika. Journal of Authentic Research, 3(2), 156-173.
Pusmenjar. (2021). Laporan Hasil Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) 2021. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. https://pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id/akm2021/. Diakses tanggal 10 Januari 2026.
Sayer, A. (2011). Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511734779
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary educational psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Segara, N. B., Afifah, S. N., Imang, U., Utami, W. S., & El Rizaq, A. D. B. (2025). Utilizing Team-Based Project Research in Improving Scientific Thinking Skills among Social Studies Students in Higher Education. Educational Process: International Journal, 18, e2025456. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.18.456.
Slavin, R. E. (2022). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. In Brundrett, M., Beauchamp, G., Latham, P., Mistry, M., Murray, M., Taylor, B., & Wood, P. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in primary education (pp. 102-111). Routledge.
Spronken‐Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry‐based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research?. Studies in higher education, 35(6), 723-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903315502.
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of educational research, 78(4), 751-796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456.
van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019). Scaffolding Student Understanding in Small-Group Work: Students’ Uptake of Teacher Support in Subsequent Small-Group Interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 206-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1522258.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.
Webb, N. M. (2019). Learning in small groups. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 1-24). Cambridge University Press.
Wells, G. (2009). The meaning makers: Learning to talk and talking to learn (Vol. 15). Multilingual Matters.
Wijaya, A., & Santoso, B. (2022). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Kolaboratif Siswa SMP. Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 167–179.
World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/. Diakses tanggal 10 Januari 2026.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Silvia Eka Nur Wulandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings in this journal are the full responsibility of the author. Jurnal Humanitas provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. Jurnal Humanitas can be accessed free of charge at no cost, following the creative commons license. Authors who publish articles in the Jurnal Humanitas must comply with the following conditions:
The author retains the copyright and grants the right of first publication with the work licensed simultaneously under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may make additional separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published journal version of the work (for example, posting it to an institution or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, on institutional repositories or websites) before and during the submission process, resulting in a productive exchange and earlier and more extensive citations of the published work.
All articles in this journal are the sole responsibility of the author. Jurnal Humanitas provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. Jurnal Humanitas can be accessed and downloaded for free, following the creative commons license.
Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
