Analisa Quality Assurance (QA) Daily Pada Pesawat Linac Di Instalasi Onkologi Radiasi RSUP Persahabatan

Authors

  • Irianti Fitri Ningsih Akademi Teknik Radiodiagnostik Dan Radioterapi Bali
  • Kadek Yuda Astina Akademi Teknik Radiodiagnostik Dan Radioterapi Bal
  • Burlian Mughnie Akademi Teknik Radiodiagnostik Dan Radioterapi Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/kpj.v9i1.27617

Keywords:

Quality Assurance, Linear Accelerator, Radiotherapy

Abstract

Linear Accelerator (Linac) plays a critical role in external radiotherapy for cancer treatment, requiring stringent quality assurance (QA) measures to ensure accuracy and safety. This study focuses on analyzing the implementation of daily QA for the Elekta Prices Linac model Precise at the Radiation Oncology Unit of RSUP Persahabatan. Conducted from May to July 2024, the analysis evaluates four key parameters: Laser Localization, Optical Distance Indicator (ODI), Door Interlock, and Audiovisual Monitor. The results demonstrate that all parameters met the tolerance limits set by AAPM Task Group 142, ensuring the Linac operates safely and effectively. Consistent implementation of daily QA is shown to detect potential deviations early, safeguarding both patient and staff safety while maintaining treatment quality.

References

Abrar, L. A., Milvita, D., Prasetio, H., & Diyona, F. (2022). Verifikasi Dosis Radiasi Berkas Foton 6 MV Pesawat Terapi LINAC CLINAX CX Menggunakan Detektor Bilik Ionisasi di RSP Universitas Andalas.

Acquah, G. F., & Schiestl, B. (2014). Quality assurance and performance evaluation of an elekta linear accelerator: results from over a year QA experience in Ghana. IJSBAR, 14, 356–363.

Bonfantini, F. (2019). Application of failure mode and effects analysis to optimization of linac quality controls protocol. Medical Physics, 46(6), 2541–2555.

Fardela, R., et al. (2023). Analysis of OAR Dose in Radiotherapy for Sinistra Breast Cancer At Universitas Andalas Hospital Analisis Dosis OAR Pada Radioterapi Kanker Payudara Sinistra Di Rumah Sakit Universitas Andalas. Natural Science, 9(2), 112–123.

Hanley, J., et al. (2021). AAPM Task Group 198 Report: An implementation guide for TG 142 quality assurance of medical accelerators. Medical Physics, 48(10), e830–e885.

Suharmono, B. H., et al. (2020). Quality Assurance (QA) Dan Quality Control (QC) Pada Instrumen Radioterapi Pesawat LINAC. Jurnal Biosains, 22(2), 73.

Wang, K., & Tepper, J. E. (2021). Radiation therapy‐associated toxicity: Etiology, management, and prevention. CA. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(5), 437–454.

Wurdiyanto, G., & Trijoko, S. (2014). Kendali Kualitas dan Jaminan Kualitas Pesawat Radioterapi Bidikan Baru Laboratorium Metrologi Radiasi. Buletin Alara, 6(2).

K. M. K. (2020). Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan (RI). NOMOR HK.01.07/MENKES/316/2020 tentang Standar Profesi Radiografer

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2008). Setting up a radiotherapy programme: clinical, medical physics, radiation protection and safety aspects. Internat. Atomic Energy Agency.

Nuklir, B. P. T. (2002). Keputusan Ka. BAPETEN No. 21/Ka-BAPETEN/XII-02 tentang Jaminan Kualitas Instalasi Radioterapi.

Nuklir, B. P. T. (2013). Peraturan Kepala (Perka) BAPETEN No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Keselamatan Radiasi dalam Penggunaan Radioterapi. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun.

Published

2025-02-22

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): In Press

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Kappa Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Semua tulisan pada jurnal ini menjadi tanggungjawab penuh penulis. Jurnal Kappa memberikan akses terbuka terhadap siapapun agar informasi dan temuan pada artikel tersebut bermanfaat bagi semua orang. Jurnal Kappa dapat diakses dan diunduh secara gratis, tanpa dipungut biaya, sesuai dengan lisensi creative commons yang digunakan