IDENTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE AND VIOLATION OF MAXIMS IN THE CONVERSATION OF THE NOVEL VIOLINIS AND KEDAI RINDU: PRAGMATICS STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs.v8i3.32429Keywords:
identification; maxim,violinis and kedai rindu novelAbstract
This research aims to identify and analyze: (1) Maxim compliance and (2) Maxim violation found in the novels Violinis and Kedai Rindu. This research is a type of qualitative research, descriptive analysis using a pragmatic approach. This research data is in the form of fragments of conversations between characters in the novels Violinis and Kedai Rindu. The data collection technique uses conversation collection techniques through transcription and then reviewing the content. In analyzing the author uses theory (according to Grice, 1975). In the novel Violinis and Kedai Rindu, f twenty-five forms of violation and compliance are found in several characters. Violation and compliance consist of the maxim of quantity, the maxim of quality, the maxim of relevance and the maxim of manner. This novel reveals the emotions, intentions, and social roles of the characters, which illustrates that literary dialogue can accurately reflect the nature of human communication and interaction as reflected in the novel of Violinis and Kedai Rindu.
References
Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan Berbahasa. Rineka Cipta: Bandung.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Ilma, C. &. (2022). Analisis Pematuhan dan Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerjasama dalam Novel Genta dan Nandea Karya Kata Kokok. Dialektika Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 18-32.
Kurniawati, S. (2018). Analisis Pematuhan dan Pelanggaran Penggunaan Maksim pada Teks Dialog Novel Matahari Karya Tere Liye. Caraka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia serta Bahasa Daerah,, 7-20.
Leech, G. N. (2016). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Routledge.
Merri Silvia Basri, H. S. (2021). Kesantunan Berbahasa: Studi pada Pembelajaran Daring. Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 242-248.
Miles, B. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif (Buku Sumber tentang Metode-metode Baru). Jakarta: UIP.
Moleong, L. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosda .
Nasution, M. M. (2021). An Analysis of Hate Speech Against K-Pop Idols and Their Fans on Instagram and Twitter from The Perspective of Pragmatics. JETLi: Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics,, , 2(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.55616/jetli.v2i2.143.
Putrayasa, I. B. (2014). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Rahardi, R. K. (2019). Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Soeparno. (2002). Dsar-dasar Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Sudaryanto. (1992). Metode Linguistik: Arah Memahami Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta: University Press.
Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Membaca : Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Edisi Revisi. . Bandung: Angkasa.
Tupan, A. a. (2008). he Multiple Violations of Conversational Maxims in Lying Done by the Characters in Some Episodes of Desperate Housewives. . Journals Scientific Research, K@ta, 10, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.10.1.63-78.
Wijana, I. D. (2010). Sosiolinguistik: Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Muslim Nasution, Julisah Izar, Dharma Yunita Siregar, Titiek Prihatiningsih, Hotma Berutu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
