Submissions

Author Guidelines

1. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika ais a journal that publishes articles in the field of Informatics/Computer Education and other relevant fields. Articles published in this journal are those that have not been published in other journals. Manuscripts are written in Microsoft Word (MS Word), using Times New Roman font size 12, on A4 paper, with 2.5 cm margins on the left, right, top, and bottom, single-spaced, and a maximum of 10 pages.
2. Manuscripts to be submitted to this journal can be accessed via the journal's website, http://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/edumatic, and must be written in English.
3. We recommend that citations and reference lists be written using reference manager applications such as Mendeley, Zotero, EndNote, and so on to avoid typographical errors.
4. Manuscripts must follow the template.
5. Duplication, fabrication, and plagiarism are prohibited.
   Manuscripts must be checked for plagiarism using Turnitin or iThenticate, and the maximum plagiarism level is 20% from the abstract to the conclusion.
6. The manuscript writing system consists of the title, author's name, author's affiliation and email, abstract, keywords, introduction, methods, results and discussion, conclusions, references.
7. The title should contain the important variables in the research. There is no need to include the location of the research unless what is discussed is truly unique to that location.
8. Authors' names and affiliations must be written correctly and consistently, both in OJS and in the manuscript. The authors' affiliations must be complete: department name, university, country. All authors in the manuscript must be registered/typed in OJS when filling in "authors" in the article submission process.
9. Abstract is written in one paragraph of approximately 150-200 words without indentation on the first line, with single spacing and a font size of 11. The abstract begins with a concise background and rationale that highlights the research problem and clearly indicates the existing research gap. It then explicitly states the objective(s) of the study. Next, the research design and methodology are briefly described, including the type of study, participants or data sources, instruments or data collection techniques, and analytical methods employed. The abstract subsequently presents the key findings in a clear and concise manner, emphasizing the most significant results that directly address the research objectives, preferably supported by quantitative or factual evidence. Finally, the abstract concludes with the main conclusion and contributions, outlining both theoretical and practical implications and their relevance to the broader field of study. Avoid citations, tables, and mathematical symbols. You must fill in the abstract and keywords in OJS.
10. The Introduction should be clear and written descriptively. In this section, there are several components that must be fulfilled. 1) Contextual Background: Describe the global, theoretical, or empirical context of the research. This section outlines current trends, important phenomena, or key issues in the relevant field of study, supported by up-to-date international references. The writing should move from general issues to more specific problems, while emphasising the urgency and scientific significance of the research topic. 2) Theoretical Foundation and Critical Literature Review: This section explains the main theoretical framework underlying the research and shows how the theory directs the focus of the research and the selection of variables. Present a critical synthesis of previous studies, emphasising patterns of findings, differences in results, or conceptual limitations, rather than merely providing a descriptive summary. 3) Literature Gap: Explain explicitly the gaps in the literature, particularly based on research conducted over the past five years. Describe the limitations of previous studies, such as methodological weaknesses, narrow research contexts, and others, or a lack of theoretical integration. Emphasise that there are still important aspects that have not been addressed by previous research. 4) Scientific Gap and Justification: Explain the knowledge gap that the research aims to fill and provide scientific justification for why this research needs to be conducted. Emphasise the potential contribution of the research to the development of theory, methodology, or practice in the relevant field. 5) Research Objectives, Novelty and Contribution: Present the research objectives clearly and explicitly. Then, in conclusion, emphasise the novelty and scientific contribution of the research. Briefly explain how this research differs from previous studies in terms of theory, methodology, data, and other relevant contexts.
11. The method must be described in sufficient detail to enable others to replicate and build upon the published results. This section describes the research design and model used (e.g. waterfall, ADDIE, etc. for development), the rationale for the design, the research procedures applied, the population and research sample or participants, the research instruments, the data collection techniques, and the data analysis techniques. The description should be in the past tense.
12. The Results and Discussion section is presented in a clear and detailed manner. The research results are separated from the discussion, and the results section can be presented based on the research results at each stage of the research (referring to the research design or model) or the research results that answer each problem formulation or other issues as long as the research results that have been carried out are visible. The research results must be supported by empirical evidence in the form of images, tables, and descriptions.

13. The discussion section must be aligned with the scientific merit analysis. 1) Key Findings Summary: A brief statement of the main findings that directly address the research objectives or questions, without repeating the technical or statistical details from the results section. 2) Theoretical Interpretation: Explain the meaning of the findings by explicitly linking them to the theoretical framework or conceptual model used, including whether the findings support, extend, or challenge existing theories. 3) Comparison with Previous Studies: Conduct a critical analysis comparing the research results with previous studies, highlighting similarities and differences, and providing scientific reasons based on context, methods, or sample characteristics. 4) Explanation of Unexpected Findings: Discuss unexpected findings or those that contradict previous hypotheses or literature, accompanied by logical and academic theoretical or contextual explanations. 5) Scientific Contribution: Emphasise the scientific contribution of research to the development of knowledge, whether in the form of theoretical enrichment, conceptual clarification, or strengthening of empirical evidence in relevant fields of study. 6) Practical and Policy Implications: Outline the practical implications or relevant policies, while maintaining relevance to scientific findings and avoiding unsubstantiated claims. 7) Limitations and Future Research: Acknowledge the limitations of the research in a proportionate and reflective manner, without reducing the scientific value or main contributions of the research. Describe recommendations for further research that are directly derived from the limitations and findings of the research, demonstrating the continuity of the research agenda.

14. The Conclusion, Present a clear statement outlining how the expectations described in the Introduction are ultimately addressed in the Results and Discussion section, thereby ensuring coherence between chapters. In addition, this section may highlight potential avenues for future development of the research findings as well as prospects for their application in subsequent studies, grounded in the reported results and discussion.
    and presented descriptively in one paragraph without numbering.
15. References. In this section, we recommend preparing a reference manager application to avoid typing errors and duplicate references, such as Mendeley, EndNote, ReferenceManager, or Zotero. Include a digital object identifier (DOI) for all references if available. All references must be in the body of the article and vice versa. Sources referred to in the article must be included in the references section. The references used should consist of at least 20 references, comprising at least 80% from journal articles and the remainder from other references. References should be up-to-date, from the last five years at least, except for basic theories required in writing the article. The writing of references and citations follows the APA Style rules, version 7, as in the following example:

Buku

Penulis 1, Penulis 2 dst. (Nama belakang, nama depan disingkat). Tahun publikasi. Judul Buku cetak miring. Edisi, Penerbit. Tempat Publikasi.

Deitel, P., & Deiitel, H. (2012). C++ How to Program. Boston: PearsonEducation.

Artikel Jurnal

Penulis 1, Penulis 2 dst, (Nama belakang, nama depan disingkat). Tahun publikasi. Judul artikel.Nama Jurnal cetak miring. Volume (Nomor), Halaman.

Cai, W., McKenna, B., Wassler, P., & Williams, N. (2021). Rethinking knowledge creation in information technology and tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 60(6), 1377-1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520946100

Abdelraheem, A., Hussaien, A., Mohammed, M., & Elbokhari, Y. (2021). The effect of information technology on the quality of accounting information. Accounting, 7(1), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.9.017

Prosiding Seminar/Konferensi

Penulis 1, Penulis 2 dst, (Nama belakang, nama depan disingkat). Tahun publikasi. Judul artikel.Nama Konferensi, Halaman, kota atau Negara: penerbit (publisher)

Paramitha, A. A. I. I., Dantes, G. R., & Indrawan, G. (2018). The Evaluation of Web Based Academic Progress Information System Using Heuristic Evaluation and User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Third International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 1–6. Palembang, Indonesia: IEEE.

Fistek, A., Jester, E., & Sonnenberg, K. (2017). Everybody’s got a little music in them: Using music therapy to connect, engage, and motivate [Conference session]. Autism Society National Conference, Milwaukee, WI, United States. https://asa.confex.com/asa/2017/webprogramarchives/Session9517.html

Skrpsi/Tesis/ Desertasi tidak terpublikasi

Harris, L. (2014). Instructional leadership perceptions and practices of elementary school leaders [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Virginia.

Skrpsi/Tesis/ Desertasi pada database

Hollander, M. M. (2017). Resistance to authority: Methodological innovations and new lessons from the Milgram experiment (Publication No. 10289373) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

 Skrpsi/Tesis/ Desertasi published online (not in a database)

Hutcheson, V. H. (2012). Dealing with dual differences: Social coping strategies of gifted and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer adolescents [Master’s thesis, The College of William & Mary]. William & Mary Digital Archive. https://digitalarchive.wm.edu/bitstream/handle/10288/16594/HutchesonVirginia2012.pdf

E print archive/repository

Junaedi, Y. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Mts pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). https://repository.upi.edu/52589/1/T_MTK_1802465_Title.pdf

Leuker, C., Samartzidis, L., Hertwig, R., & Pleskac, T. J. (2018). When money talks: Judging risk and coercion in high-paying clinical trials. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9P7CB

Stults-Kolehmainen, M. A., & Sinha, R. (2015). The effects of stress on physical activity and exercise. PubMed Central. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894304

 Internet

Laksono, F. (2019). Pengertian dan Dasar Input Output C++. Retrieved December 12, 2020, from Belajar C++ website: https://www.belajarcpp.com/tutorial/cpp/dasar-input-output