Publication Ethics

Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal. This publication ethics statement outlines the ethical responsibilities and conduct expected from all parties involved in the publication process, including authors, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board, peer reviewers, and the publisher, Universitas Hamzanwadi. The principles described in this statement are developed in accordance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Journal Publication Ethics Guidelines

Articles published in Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika play a crucial role in advancing a credible and interconnected body of scholarly knowledge. The quality of published articles reflects the academic rigor of the authors and the institutions supporting them. As peer-reviewed works represent and reinforce the scientific method, it is essential that all stakeholders involved in the publication process authors, editors, reviewers, publishers, and readers adhere to high standards of ethical behavior. As the publisher of Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, Universitas Hamzanwadi acknowledges its responsibility to oversee every stage of the publication process with integrity. The publisher is committed to maintaining editorial independence and ensuring that commercial interests, including advertising, reprints, or other revenue sources, do not influence editorial decisions.

 

Research Misconduct and Ethical Violations

Research misconduct includes, but is not limited to, data fabrication, data falsification, citation manipulation, and plagiarism during the conduct, review, or reporting of research. When evidence suggests that an author has engaged in unethical practices or serious irregularities in a submitted or published article, the editorial team bears the responsibility of safeguarding the accuracy and credibility of the scholarly record. In cases of suspected ethical violations, the editors and editorial board will follow COPE-recommended procedures to address complaints and ensure fair and transparent resolution. Manuscripts identified as containing ethical breaches will be rejected. If ethical violations are discovered after publication, appropriate actions such as issuing corrections or retractions will be taken and clearly linked to the original article.

 

Investigation Procedures

The initial stage of handling an allegation involves verifying its validity and determining whether it meets the criteria for research misconduct. This process also includes identifying any potential conflicts of interest related to the individuals involved. If credible concerns arise regarding scientific errors or significant research irregularities, the matter will be communicated to the corresponding author, who will be asked to provide a comprehensive explanation on behalf of all co-authors. Upon reviewing the response, the editors may seek further evaluation from independent experts, such as statistical reviewers, to ensure an objective assessment. In situations where misconduct is deemed unlikely, clarification or additional analysis may be published, often in the form of a letter to the editor, accompanied by corrections or amendments to the original article when necessary.

 

Institutional Responsibility and Integrity of the Scholarly Record

Academic institutions are expected to conduct thorough and impartial investigations into allegations of research misconduct. Authors, journals, and institutions share a collective responsibility to preserve the reliability and accuracy of the scientific record. By responding appropriately to concerns related to research integrity and implementing corrective measures such as corrections, retractions, or retractions with replacement Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika remains committed to upholding the validity and trustworthiness of scholarly communication.

 

Publication Decisions

The editor holds full responsibility for determining which manuscripts submitted to the journal are accepted for publication. Editorial decisions are based on the scholarly merit of the manuscript and may be informed by recommendations from the editorial board and peer reviewers. In making these decisions, editors must also comply with applicable legal and ethical standards, including regulations related to defamation, copyright violations, and plagiarism. When necessary, the editor may consult with other editors or reviewers to reach an informed and balanced decision.

 

Complaints and Appeals

Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika has established transparent procedures for handling complaints and appeals concerning the journal, editorial staff, editorial board members, or the publisher. Complaints will be reviewed and clarified by an independent and competent party assigned to address the case. The scope of complaints includes, but is not limited to, editorial decision-making, citation manipulation, reviewer or editor bias, peer-review misconduct, and other irregularities in journal management. All complaints and appeals will be processed in accordance with COPE guidelines to ensure fairness and accountability.

 

Post-Publication Discussion

The journal supports scholarly dialogue after publication by allowing constructive discussions in the form of debate articles, letters to the editor, or moderated commentary published on the journal’s website or other approved platforms.

 

Fair Play

Editors evaluate all submitted manuscripts solely on the basis of their academic quality and intellectual contribution, without discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic background, nationality, or political ideology of the authors.

 

Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff are required to maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts. Information related to a submission may only be shared with the corresponding authors, assigned reviewers, prospective reviewers, editorial advisors, or the publisher when necessary for the editorial process.

 

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Any unpublished information or data obtained through submitted manuscripts must not be used by editors for personal research or professional advantage without obtaining explicit written permission from the author(s).

 

Data Sharing Policy

Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika is committed to promoting open and transparent research practices that enhance reproducibility, verification, and scholarly collaboration. Authors are strongly encouraged to make their research data publicly available, including but not limited to raw and processed datasets, software, algorithms, protocols, methodologies, and research materials, where appropriate and in accordance with ethical and legal considerations.

 

Duties of Reviewers

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The peer-review process plays a vital role in supporting editors when making publication decisions. Constructive feedback from reviewers also contributes to improving the quality, clarity, and scholarly value of manuscripts submitted to the journal.

2. Reviewer Competence and Timeliness

Reviewers who believe they lack the necessary expertise to evaluate a manuscript, or who are unable to complete the review within the agreed timeframe, must promptly inform the editor and withdraw from the review assignment.

3. Confidentiality

Manuscripts received for peer review must be regarded as confidential materials. Reviewers are prohibited from sharing, discussing, or disclosing any part of the manuscript with others unless explicitly authorized by the editor.

4. Objectivity and Review Standards

Reviews must be conducted in an objective, fair, and professional manner. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers are expected to provide clear, reasoned, and evidence-based evaluations to support their recommendations.

5. Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant scholarly works that have not been cited by the authors and recommend appropriate references where necessary. If reviewers recognize substantial similarities or overlaps between the submitted manuscript and previously published works, they must promptly inform the editor.

6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Any confidential information or privileged insights obtained during the peer-review process must not be used for personal or professional advantage. Reviewers should decline to review manuscripts if they have any conflicts of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, financial, or other relationships with the authors, institutions, or organizations connected to the manuscript.

 

Duties of Authors

1. Reporting Standards

Authors of original research articles are required to present a truthful, accurate, and transparent account of the research conducted, accompanied by an objective discussion of its relevance and contributions. Research data must be reported precisely and honestly. Manuscripts should provide sufficient methodological detail and appropriate references to enable replication by other researchers. Any form of misleading, fabricated, or deliberately inaccurate reporting is considered unethical and will not be tolerated.

2. Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that their submissions are entirely original. When ideas, data, or words from other sources are used, they must be properly cited and acknowledged. Plagiarism in any form constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

3. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

Authors are prohibited from publishing substantially similar research findings in more than one journal or major publication. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously is considered unethical and will result in rejection.

4. Acknowledgment of Sources

Authors must appropriately acknowledge the contributions of previous research by citing all relevant publications that significantly influenced the development and execution of the reported study.

5. Authorship and Contribution

Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the study. All individuals who meet these criteria must be listed as co-authors. Contributors who participated in specific but limited aspects of the research should be acknowledged accordingly. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all eligible co-authors are properly included, that no inappropriate authors are listed, and that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript prior to submission.

6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors are required to disclose any financial, institutional, or personal relationships that could potentially influence the research outcomes or interpretations presented in the manuscript. Sources of funding and other relevant support must be clearly stated.

7. Fundamental Errors in Published Work

If authors identify significant errors or inaccuracies in their published articles, they are obligated to promptly inform the journal editor and cooperate fully in issuing corrections or retractions to maintain the integrity of the scholarly record.

8. Ethical Oversight

For research involving human participants, animals, hazardous materials, chemicals, or specialized equipment, authors must clearly describe ethical considerations and risk management procedures in the manuscript. Where applicable, authors must provide evidence of ethical approval or legal authorization from relevant institutional or regulatory bodie

9. Confidentiality and Data Protection

In studies involving confidential, sensitive, or proprietary data including business or marketing information authors must clearly explain how data confidentiality is maintained and whether access to such data is restricted in accordance with ethical and legal requirements.