Evaluation of Rapidminer-Aplication in Data Mining Learning using PeRSIVA Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v4i2.2688Keywords:
Data Mining, RapidMiner, PeRSIVA ModelAbstract
RapidMiner is an application that is used to analyze data quantities and qualitatively to obtain information and knowledge as expected. This software is implemented to process data using several methods or algorithms in Data Minig learning. However, when using this software, users sometimes cannot distinguish between various methods or algorithms in Data Mining. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate to optimize the use of this software in data mining learning. This study focuses on RapidMiner evaluation of data mining learning using the Persiva model. This model consists of aspects of satisfaction, behavior, impact, and effectiveness. The data collection technique was in the form of a questionnaire with 48 subjects. Data analysis used is descriptive statistics to determine satisfaction, behavior and effects. Meanwhile, Think-Aloud Retrospective technique is used to determine the effectiveness of RapidMiner. Our findings show that users are satisfied with the results of respondents on average agreeing (80%), in the aspect of behavior and impact, the percentage results are above 80%, and the use of this application has been effective with a completion rate above 90%. So it can be concluded that by using this application in data mining learning users can easily complete tasks, and be motivated, and add insights and knowledge in relevant disciplines.
References
Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5), 82–107.
Adel, R. (2017). Manage perceived e-learning quality in Egyptian context. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(5–6), 600–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1103174
Albano, G. (2011). Knowledge, Skills, Competencies: A Model for Mathematics E-Learning. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22383-9_18
Alhadreti, O., Elbabour, F., & Mayhew, P. (2017). Eye tracking in retrospective think-aloud usability testing: is there added value? Journal of Usability Studies, 12(3), 95–110.
Chrysafiadi, K., & Virvou, M. (2013a). Dynamically personalized e-training in computer programming and the language C. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 385–392.
Chrysafiadi, K., & Virvou, M. (2013b). PeRSIVA: An empirical evaluation method of a student model of an intelligent e-learning environment for computer programming. Computers & Education, 68, 322–333.
Gaudioso, E., Montero, M., & Hernandez-Del-Olmo, F. (2012). Supporting teachers in adaptive educational systems through predictive models: A proof of concept. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 621–625.
Littenberg-Tobias, J., & Reich, J. (2020). Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: A case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program. The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100759.
Lloréns, R., Noé, E., Colomer, C., & Alcañiz, M. (2015). Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual reality-based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(3), 418-425.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.019
Mokshin, A. V, Mokshin, V. V, & Sharnin, L. M. (2019). Adaptive genetic algorithms used to analyze behavior of complex system. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 71, 174–186.
Muntinga, T., & Taylor, G. (2018). Information-seeking strategies in medicine queries: a clinical eye-tracking study with gaze-cued retrospective think-aloud protocol. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(6), 506–518.
Salmerón, L., Naumann, J., GarcÃa, V., & Fajardo, I. (2017). Scanning and deep processing of information in hypertext: an eye tracking and cued retrospective thinkâ€aloud study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(3), 222–233.
Sinclair, P. M., Kable, A., Levett-Jones, T., & Booth, D. (2016). The effectiveness of Internet-based e-learning on clinician behaviour and patient outcomes: a systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 57, 70–81.
Sorgenfrei, C., & Smolnik, S. (2016). The effectiveness of eâ€learning systems: A review of the empirical literature on learner control. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 154–184.
Sunder M, V. (2016). Constructs of quality in higher education services. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(8), 1091–1111.
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: a structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 306–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635
Uska, M. Z., Usuluddin, U., & Sriatni, S. (2019). Usability Testing Method: Efisiensi, Efektivitas dan Kepuasan Pengguna Terhadap Website SMKN 1 Praya. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 3(2), 91–98.
Uska, M. Z., Wirasasmita, R. H., & Fahrurrozi, M. (2020). The application of Usability Testing Method for Evaluating the New Student Acceptance (NSA) System. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1539(1), 1–6. IOP Publishing.
Yilmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251–260.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Semua tulisan pada jurnal ini adalah tanggung jawab penuh penulis. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika bisa diakses secara free (gratis) tanpa ada pungutan biaya, sesuai dengan lisensi creative commons yang digunakan.
This work is licensed under a Lisensi a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
