Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v5i2.3850Keywords:
Codec, Digital Video Mean Square Error, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio, Video CompressionAbstract
Video applications consume more energy on the Internet and can be accessed by electronic devices, due to an increase in the consumption of high-resolution and high-quality video content, presenting serious issues to delivery infrastructure that needs higher video compression technologies. The focus of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the most current codec, AV1, to its predecessor codec. The comparison was made experimentally at two video resolutions (1080p and 720p) by sampling video frames with various CRF/CQP values and testing several parameters analyses such as encoding duration, compression ratio, bit rate, Mean Square Error (MSE), and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR). The AV1 codec is very great in terms of quality and file size, even though it is slower in terms of compression speed. The H.265/HEVC codec, on the other side, beats the other codec in terms of compression ratio. In conclusion, the H.265/HEVC codec is suggested as a material for obtaining a well compressed video with small file size and a short time.
References
Akyazi, P., & Ebrahimi, T. (2018). Comparison Of Compression Efficiency Between HEVC/H. 265, VP9 and AV1 Based On Subjective Quality Assessments. 2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 1–6.
Chen, Z., He, T., Jin, X., & Wu, F. (2019). Learning for Video Compression. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 30(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2019.2892608
Deep, V., & Elarabi, T. (2017). HEVC/H. 265 vs. VP9 state-of-the-art video coding comparison for HD and UHD applications. 2017 IEEE 30th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), 1–4.
Harto, V., Primananda, R., & Suharsono, A. (2020). Analisis Performansi H.264 dan H.265 pada Video Streaming dari Segi Quality Of Service. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 1(10), 1172–1181. https://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/358
Idris, M. H., Tri hanHanuranto, A., & Sanjoyo, D. D. (2019). Analisis Performansi Video Kompresi H. 265 (HEVC) Dan VP9 Pada Layanan Video Streaming Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) Dari Segi Quality Of Service (QOS). EProceedings of Engineering, 6(2), 1–8.
Layek, M. A., Thai, N. Q., Hossain, M. A., Thu, N. T., Talukder, A., Chung, T., & Huh, E.-N. (2017a). Analysis Of The Effects Of Timing Presets On The Performance of H. 264/AVC and H. 265/HEVC Video Encoders. 한국통신학회 학술대회논문집, 442–443.
Layek, M. A., Thai, N. Q., Hossain, M. A., Thu, N. T., Talukder, A., Chung, T., & Huh, E.-N. (2017b). Performance Analysis of H. 264, H. 265, VP9 and AV1 Video Encoders. 2017 19th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium (APNOMS), 322–325. https://doi.org/10.1109/APNOMS.2017.8094162
Ostermann, J., Bormans, J., List, P., Marpe, D., Narroschke, M., Pereira, F., Stockhammer, T., & Wedi, T. (2004). Video coding with H. 264/AVC: tools, performance, and complexity. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 4(1), 7–28.
Rabie, T., & Baziyad, M. (2020). PixoComp: a novel video compression scheme utilizing temporal pixograms. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(19), 13179–13196.
Ram, C., & Panwar, S. (2017). Performance comparison of high efficiency video coding (HEVC) with H. 264 AVC. International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), 303–310. India: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2017.58
Rizal, A., Suharso, A., Abujabbar, P., & Munir, M. (2020). Objective Quality Assessment of Multi-Resolution Video based on H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC Encoding. Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 2019. Bandung, Indoensia: EAI. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296550
Robitza, W. (2017). CRF Guide (Faktor Tingkat Konstan dalam x264 dan x265). Https://Slhck.Info. https://slhck.info/video/2017/02/24/crf-guide.html
Sara, U., Akter, M., & Uddin, M. S. (2019). Image quality assessment through FSIM, SSIM, MSE and PSNR—a comparative study. Journal of Computer and Communications, 7(3), 8–18.
Sullivan, G. J., Ohm, J.-R., Han, W.-J., & Wiegand, T. (2012). Overview Of The High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 22(12), 1649–1668.
Wiegand, T., Sullivan, G. J., Bjontegaard, G., & Luthra, A. (2003). Overview Of The H. 264/AVC Video Coding Standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 13(7), 560–576.
Zhang, T., & Mao, S. (2019). An overview of emerging video coding standards. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications, 22(4), 13–20.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Semua tulisan pada jurnal ini adalah tanggung jawab penuh penulis. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika bisa diakses secara free (gratis) tanpa ada pungutan biaya, sesuai dengan lisensi creative commons yang digunakan.
This work is licensed under a Lisensi a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
