Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pembelajaran Daring Melalui LMS pada Masa Covid 19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v5i2.4158Keywords:
Covid 19 e-Learning, Learning Management System,Abstract
Online (e-learning) during the Covid-19 pandemic has become a trend in education that causes significant changes in learning, forcing universities to adapt to learning conditions during Covid 19. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that influence online learning through the use of the Learning Management System (LMS) during the Covid 19 pandemic at Universitas Gunung Rinjani. Differences in LMS use based on some demographic information such as gender, location (place of residence), and age are also discussed to gain an in-depth understanding of the use of LMS during online learning. There are two research methods used in this study, namely quantitative and qualitative. The data collection process was carried out through an online survey instrument distributed to 6 Faculties 7 Study Programs at Universitas Gunung Rinjani. In addition, interviews with students will be conducted to gain an in-depth understanding of LMS use in their learning. The findings of this study indicate that LMS use during Covid 19 learning can run well; this can be seen from the participants' perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, subjective norms and attitudes of self-efficacy and support from lecturers and colleagues.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5, 143–155.
Aman, A., Prasojo, L. D., Sofwan, M., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., & Yaqin, L. N. (2020). Factors Affecting Indonesian Pre-Service Teachers’ Use of m-LMS: A Mix Method Study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 14(06), 137–147.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
Dharmayanti, W., Dharmayanti, W., & Nurcahyo, R. W. (2021). Analisis dan Perancangan E-Learning Adaptif di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v5i1.2544
Ferreira, J. B., Klein, A. Z., Freitas, A., & Schlemmer, E. (2013). Mobile learning: Definition, uses and challenges. Cutting-Edge Technologies in Higher Education, 6(PARTD), 47–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2013)000006D005/FULL/XML
Gao, S., Krogstie, J., & Siau, K. (2014). Adoption of mobile information services: An empirical study. Mobile Information Systems, 10(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.3233/MIS-130176
Gefen, D. (2003). TAM or just plain habit: A look at experienced online shoppers. Journal of End User Computing, 15, 1–13.
Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Yaqin, L. N., Parhanuddin, L., Razak, R. A., Nazry, N. N. M., Taridi, M., Karomi, K., & Fathurrijal, F. (2021). Mapping Instructional Barriers during COVID-19 Outbreak: Islamic Education Context. Religions 2021, Vol. 12, Page 50, 12(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/REL12010050
Iqbal, S., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2016). What drives m-learning? An empirical investigation of university student perceptions in Pakistan. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1236782, 36(4), 730–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1236782
Jamaludin, J., & Rizal, M. K. (2017). Sistem Informasi Akademik STKIP Hamzanwadi Selong Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 1(2), 65–74.
Muhaimin, Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Pratama, R., Asrial, & Harja, H. (2019). Predicting factors affecting intention to use web 2.0 in learning: Evidence from science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(4), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.33225/JBSE/19.18.595
Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8535.2011.01229.X
Rogers, E. M. (1995). The diffusion of innovations. NewYork: Free Press.
Saroia, A. I., & Gao, S. (2019). Investigating university students’ intention to use mobile learning management systems in Sweden. Nnovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), 569-580.
Sulistyohati, A. (2020). Pengukuran e-learning readiness pada mahasiswa sebagai upaya penerapan pembelajaran jarak jauh masa pandemi covid-19. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 4(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v4i2.2674
Uska, M. Z. (2017). Analisis Penerimaan Digital Library Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) di Universitas Hamzanwadi. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v1i1.723
Uska, M. Z., & Wirasasmita, R. H. (2018). Analisis Teknologi Smartphone dalam Mendukung Kegiatan Akademis di Universitas Hamzanwadi Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 2(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v2i2.1086
Utami, I., Utami, I. S., Budi, S., & Nurhastuti, N. (2020). A Need Analysis of Blended Learning Model for Deaf Students in Higher Education. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 4(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v4i2.2649
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Semua tulisan pada jurnal ini adalah tanggung jawab penuh penulis. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika bisa diakses secara free (gratis) tanpa ada pungutan biaya, sesuai dengan lisensi creative commons yang digunakan.
This work is licensed under a Lisensi a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
