The Socio-Economic Impacts of the Smallholder Cotton Intensification Program on Farmers in Grobogan Regency during the New Order Government

Authors

  • Fauzan Syahru Ramadhan Universitas Diponegoro
  • Khairana Zata Nugroho Universitas Diponegoro
  • Desi Susanti Universitas Diponegoro
  • Ilham Nur Utomo Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/fhs.v9i2.29737

Keywords:

Grobogan regency, socio-economic life of farmers, New Order, smallholder cotton intensification

Abstract

This article examines the impact of the Smallholder Cotton Intensification Program on the socio-economic lives of farmers in the Grobogan Regency during the New Order era. The background for implementing the Smallholder Cotton Intensification Program in Grobogan Regency was because the area was rainfed land and moor or dry rice fields, so it was very promising for the development of cotton in the area. The method used in compiling this article is the historical method which consists of four stages, namely heuristics, criticism, interpretation and historiography. Through this research, the fact was obtained that the implementation of the Smallholder Cotton Intensification Program in Grobogan Regency could be said to be successful because it was supported by several factors such as the type of land suitable for planting cotton, the planting area that was still available, the response of farmers who were willing to accept the presence of the program because they had felt the good results so that it was considered a commodity that could increase their income, as well as good coordination between the Grobogan Regency Plantation Service and the Plantations Limited Company of Indonesia (PT. Perkebunan, PTP) XVIII as the management in successing the implementation of the program. Thus, it can be concluded that the successful implementation of the Smallholder Cotton Intensification Program had influenced the socio-economic life of farmers in Grobogan Regency, such as the establishment of farmer groups, wider employment opportunities, and increasing amount of farmer incomes as well.

References

Aan den Redacteur der Javasche Courant. Passaroeang, den 29sten Februari 1828 . (1828, April 27). Javasche Courant, 1–4.

Bulandari, Y. Y. (2000). Intensifikasi Kapas Rakyat dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Ekonomi Petani (Kasus di Kabupaten Grobogan Tahun 1979-1990). Universitas Diponegoro.

Cahyono, T. (1983). Kebijakan Pertanian. Andi Offset.

Damayanti, S. I., & Hudiyanto, R. R. (2022). Industri perkebunan kapas Asembagus, Situbondo tahun 1945-1997. Historiography, 2(3), 421-441. https://doi.org/10.17977/um081v2i32022p421-441.

Departemen Pertanian. (1984). Penanganan Penyuluhan Perkebunan Dalam Repelita IV 1984/1985-1988/1989. Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan.

Departemen Pertanian. (1985). Gema Penyuluhan Seri Khusus Perkebunan. Balai Pendidikan, Latihan, dan Penyuluhan Pertanian.

Dinas Pertanian. (1981). IKR (Intensifikasi Kapas Rakyat). Balai Informasi Pertanian.

Garraghan, G. J. (1957). A Guide to Historical Method. Fordham University Press.

Gervase Clarence-Smith, W. (n.d.). The cotton textile industries of Southeast Asia and “Bantu” Africa, 1840s to 1950s.

Gottschalk, L. (1983). Understanding History. University of Indonesia Press.

Herlina, N. (2020). Metode sejarah. In Satya Historika (Issue 9). Satya Historika.

Kartodirdjo, S. (1982). Pemikiran dan Perkembangan Historiografi Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kartohadikoesoemo, N. (1987). Bercocok Tanam Kapas di Indonesia. Lembaga Pendidikan Perkebunan.

Kartohadikoesoemo, N. (1997). Kapas Budidaya dan Pengembangannya. Lembaga Pendidikan Perkebunan.

Khan, M. A., Ahmad, S., Hasanuzzaman, M., Ahmed, M., Tahir, M. T., Wahid, A., & Ahmad, M. (2020). World Cotton Production and Consumption: An Overview (pp. 1–7). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_1

Kuntowijoyo. (1995). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yayasan Bentang Budaya.

Laporan Tahunan UPP IKR Demak/Grobogan Tahun 1979/1980 Sampai 1989/1990. (n.d.).

Memori Serah Terima Jabatan Kepala UPP IKR Grobogan Tahun 1993. (n.d.).

Mubyarto. (1983). Politik Pertanian dan Pembangunan Pedesaan. Sinar Harapan.

PTP XVIII. (1991). Pelaksanaan Alih Teknologi dan Permasalahannya. PTP. XVIII.

Riani, R., Zuriani, Z., Zahara, H., & Hafizin, H. (2021). Fungsi Kelompok Tani Pada Usaha Tani Padi Sawah di Gampong Uteun Bunta Kecamatan Peusangan Kabupaten Bireuen. Agrifo : Jurnal Agribisnis Universitas Malikussaleh, 6(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.29103/ag.v6i1.4941

Sulistyo, & Mawarni, A. (1991). Kapas Kajian Sosial Ekonomi. Aditya Media.

Sunardi. (1991). Pola Tanam Kapas Dengan Palawija. Dinas Perkebunan.

Tim P3PK UGM. (1989). Studi Aspek Antropologis/Sosiologis dan Ekonomi Intensifikasi Kapas Rakyat di Nusa Tenggara Barat. Tim P3PK UGM.

Timmer, C. P. (2019). Indonesia (pp. 424–449). Oxford University Pressoxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844938.003.0017.

Untung, K. (1981). Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Rintisan Terpadu Hama Kapas. Fakultas Pertanian UGM.

van der Eng, P. (2006). “De-industrialisation” and colonial rule: The cotton textile industry in Indonesia “De-industrialisation” and colonial rule: The cotton textile industry in Indonesia, 1820-1942. 1–26. http://ecocomm.anu.edu.au/people/pierre.vandereng

van der Eng, P. (2014). Cotton in Indonesia. In Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures (pp. 1–5). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_10236-1

Wahyuni, S. A. (1990). Kemungkinan Perubahan Pola Tanam Kapas di Wilayah Kabupaten Grobogan Bila Ada irigasi Teknis. Balai Penelitian Tembakau dan Tanaman Serat.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-25

How to Cite

Ramadhan, F. S., Khairana Zata Nugroho, Desi Susanti, & Utomo, I. N. (2025). The Socio-Economic Impacts of the Smallholder Cotton Intensification Program on Farmers in Grobogan Regency during the New Order Government. Fajar Historia: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah Dan Pendidikan, 9(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.29408/fhs.v9i2.29737

Issue

Section

Artikel