Dinamika Interaksi dan Strategi Adaptasi Guru dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Problem-Based Learning di SMA Negeri 1 Praya Tengah Lombok Tengah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/fhs.v10i2.36601Keywords:
classroom interaction, historical thinking, history education, pedagogical adaptation, problem-based learningAbstract
Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in history education requires changes not only in activity design but also in classroom interaction and teachers’ capacity to adapt instruction to contextual conditions. This study analyzes interaction dynamics, teachers’ pedagogical adaptation strategies, and students’ learning experiences during PBL implementation in history classes at SMA Negeri 1 Praya Tengah, Central Lombok. A qualitative case-study design was employed. Participants comprised three history teachers and 32 eleventh-grade students. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured teacher interviews, a descriptive student questionnaire and student interviews, and analysis of instructional documents. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically with NVivo 12, while questionnaire data were used descriptively to support interpretation. Three major patterns emerged. First, classroom interaction shifted from predominantly one-way communication toward two-way and multi-directional exchanges, with teachers increasingly acting as facilitators, mediators, and providers of scaffolding. Second, teachers developed adaptations including hybrid PBL, gradual scaffolding, problem chunking, differentiated learning resources, structured group roles, and reflective adjustment in response to student heterogeneity, time constraints, and difficulties in designing authentic historical problems. Third, 28 of 32 students (87.5%) reported more active involvement, while 24 students (75%) perceived that PBL helped them understand and analyze historical events more deeply; nevertheless, approximately one quarter still experienced difficulties with abstract or complex problems. These findings suggest that PBL in history education is better understood as an adaptive pedagogical practice whose quality is associated with interaction management, scaffolding, problem design, and differentiation rather than as a uniform instructional procedure
References
Alexander, R. J. (2017). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (5th ed.). Dialogos.
Bae, H., Craig, T., Xia, F., Chen, Y., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2021). Developing historical thinking through problem-based learning: A case study of synergistic scaffolding. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v15i2.28776.
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01386.x.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
Clark, C. M., & Lampert, M. (1986). The study of teacher thinking: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718603700506.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Loyens, S. M. M., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 1087–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6.
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Dialogic interactions in the cooperative classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.009.
Goronga, P. (2013). The nature and quality of classroom interaction in Zimbabwean primary schools: Exploring the experiences and perceptions of teachers. Academic Research International, 4(2), 431-444. http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.4(2)/2013(4.2-45).pdf.
Hajaroh, S., & Adawiyah, R. (2018). Kesulitan guru dalam mengimplementasikan penilaian autentik. El Midad, 10(2), 131-152. https://ftkjournal-uinmataram.id/index.php/elmidad/article/view/778.
Hasan, S. H. (2019). Pendidikan sejarah untuk kehidupan abad ke-21. HISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah, 2(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.17509/historia.v2i2.16630.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
Hung, W. (2011). Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9198-1.
Hung, W. (2016). All PBL starts here: The problem. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1604.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936)
Hutauruk, A. F., Ginting, A. M., Arent, E., & Dabukke, L. (2024). Menganalisis implementasi konstruksi berpikir historis dalam mata kuliah Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah di Universitas Simalungun. Islamic Education, 4(2), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.57251/ie.v4i2.1535.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4), 85–118. https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/454.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Meilina, A. P. (2025). Analisis kesenjangan pengembangan kompetensi pedagogik guru PGMI: Kajian kritis berbasis teori konstruktivistik. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Agama Islam, 3(3), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v3i3.1114.
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X.
Puspitasari, D., Ulfah, M., Ramadhan, I., & Wijayati, Y. F. D. R. (2023). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dengan Media Games Dadu dan Kahoot terhadap Hasil Belajar. PTK: Jurnal Tindakan Kelas, 4(1), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.53624/ptk.v4i1.295.
Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. J. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Heri Suharion, Badarudin Badarudin, Abdul Rasyad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish articles in Fajar Historia Journal must comply with the following conditions:
- The author retains the copyright and grants the journal first publication rights. The work is licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license, which allows others to share the work to acknowledge the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may make additional separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published journal version of the work (for example, posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during the submission process, as this can result in a productive exchange and earlier and larger citations of the published work.
Fajar Historia journal provides open access to benefit anyone with valuable information and findings. All articles in this journal are the sole responsibility of the author. Fajar Historia journal can be accessed and downloaded for free, following the creative commons license.
Fajar Historia: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah dan Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
