Perbandingan Efisiensi Bahan Bakar Pada Kendaraan Low MPV Dengan Metode Copras
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jit.v7i2.26050Keywords:
Fuel, Copras, Efficiency, Low Multi-Purpose VehicleAbstract
Low multi-purpose vehicles have become a popular choice in the automotive market due to their combination of ample space and improved fuel efficiency. In the context of increasing environmental awareness and ever-increasing fuel costs, this study aims to compare the fuel efficiency of various low multi-purpose vehicles using the Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) method. The Copras method, as a multi-criteria decision analysis tool, is used to evaluate vehicle alternatives based on a number of predefined criteria. In this study, the main criteria considered include engine efficiency, aerodynamics, vehicle weight, and fuel technology used. The identification of these criteria is important as fuel efficiency is influenced by various complex technical factors. Relevant data was collected for the low multi-purpose vehicles to be evaluated. Once the data was collected, a Copras analysis was conducted to determine the relative ranking of each vehicle based on its fuel efficiency. This method allowed the researcher to identify vehicles that stood out in terms of fuel efficiency. The results of this study are expected to provide valuable insights for both consumers and vehicle manufacturers. Consumers can use this information to make smarter decisions when choosing a vehicle that suits their needs, taking into account the important aspect of fuel efficiency. On the other hand, manufacturers can use these findings to develop more fuel-efficient vehicles, as well as to strengthen their position in an increasingly competitive market. In addition, this study also has significant implications in an environmental context. By choosing more fuel-efficient vehicles, consumers can contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and reduce other negative impacts on the environment. As such, this research not only provides economic benefits but also supports efforts to maintain environmental sustainability
References
F. A. Arsy, “Demand Forecasting of Toyota Avanza Cars in Indonesia: Grey Systems Approach,” Int. J. Grey Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–47, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.52812/IJGS.24.
S. Badiwibowo Atim and P. Korespondensi, “Penerapan Metode Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison Dalam Rekomendasi Pemilihan Mobil Second,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99–110, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.58602/ITSECS.V2I2.111.
S. A. Arsita, G. E. Saputro, and S. Susanto, “Perkembangan Kebijakan Energi Nasional dan Energi Baru Terbarukan Indonesia,” J. Syntax Transform., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1779–1788, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.46799/JST.V2I12.473.
H. S. Disemadi, “Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies,” J. Judic. Rev., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 289–304, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.37253/JJR.V24I2.7280.
G. Lahope, “Implementasi Kebijakan Energi Nasional (KEN) Indonesia Menuju 23% Target Bauran Energi Baru Terbarukan (EBT) 2025,” J. Darma Agung, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 124–135, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.46930/OJSUDA.V32I1.3945.
M. R. Baharuddin, “Adaptasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (Fokus: Model MBKM Program Studi),” J. Stud. Guru dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 195–205, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.30605/JSGP.4.1.2021.591.
A. Fransiska, “Penataan Koleksi Bahan Pustaka Di Perpustakaan Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya Sebagai Upaya Mempermudah Menemukan Kembali Buku Yang Diperlukan Oleh Pemustaka,” J. Multidisipliner Bharasumba, vol. 2, no. 03, pp. 218–229, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.62668/BHARASUMBA.V2I03.735.
S. Suhartini, B. A. C. Permana, L. Sahibul Purwa, and H. M. Putra, “Penerapan Metode Weighted Product Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Dosen Pembimbing Skripsi,” Infotek J. Inform. dan Teknol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 82–92, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.29408/JIT.V7I1.23971.
Y. Nurul Aini, A. Dwi Haryanti, and K. Trianti, “Analisis Kinerja Industri Rokok Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Dengan Pendekatan Rasio Profitabilitas,” J. Akad. Akunt., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 56–68, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.22219/JAA.V4I1.15474.
M. Saiful, L. M. S. Samsu, and A. E. Sutriandi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Strategi Manajemen Resiko UMKM Berbasis Web Dengan Metode Certainty Factor,” Infotek J. Inform. dan Teknol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 216–226, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.29408/JIT.V7I1.24164.
J. Lu, S. Zhang, J. Wu, and Y. Wei, “COPRAS method for multiple attribute group decision making under picture fuzzy environment and their application to green supplier selection,” Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 369–385, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3846/TEDE.2021.14211.
Y. Aydın, “A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Model Consisting of SD and COPRAS Methods in Performance Evaluation of Foreign Deposit Banks”, Accessed: May 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dergipark.gov.tr/equinox
A. Shaikh, A. Singh, D. Ghose, and Shabbiruddin, “Analysis and selection of optimum material to improvise braking system in automobiles using integrated Fuzzy-COPRAS methodology,” Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 265–273, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/17509653.2020.1772895.
S. Özcan and A. K. Çelik, “A comparison of TOPSIS, grey relational analysis and COPRAS methods for machine selection problem in the food industry of Turkey,” Int. J. Prod. Manag. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 81–92, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.4995/IJPME.2021.14734.
A. Özdağoğlu, G. Z. Öztaş, M. K. Keleş, and V. Genç, “An Integrated PIPRECIA and COPRAS Method under Fuzzy Environment: A Case of Truck Tractor Selection,” Alphanumeric J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 269–298, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.17093/ALPHANUMERIC.1005970.
G. S. Mahendra et al., “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN (Teori dan Penerapannya dalam berbagai Metode) - Google Books,” Google Books. Accessed: May 15, 2024.
C. Habib Romadhon and dan Tanti Kustiari, “Pengembangan Usaha Minyak Atsiri Kabupaten Jember Dengan Metode Decision Support System (DSS),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Terap. Ris. Inov., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 122–130, Nov. 2020, Accessed: May 15, 2024.
I. R. Saretta, “Decision Support System (DSS): Pengertian, Karakteristik, hingga Jenisnya - Cermati.com,” cermati.com. Accessed: May 10, 2024.
S. Rohman Cholil, M. Adi Setyawan, and P. Korespondensi, “Metode COPRAS untuk Menentukan Kain Terbaik dalam Pembuatan Pakaian pada Butik Batik Hatta Semarang,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1169–1176, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.25126/JTIIK.2021863584.
Syafnidawaty, “Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) - UNIVERSITAS RAHARJA,” raharja.ac.id. Accessed: May 10, 2024.
G. Ginting, S. Alvita, A. Karim, M. Syahrizal, and N. Khairani Daulay, “Penerapan Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) Dalam Penentuan Kepolisian Sektor Terbaik,” J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komput. dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 616–631, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.30645/J-SAKTI.V4I2.254.
A. Sudianto, L. K. Wijaya, J. Jumawal, and M. Mahpuz, “Penerapan Aplikasi Warung Media Berbasis Android Guna Meningkatkan Promosi dan Penjualan”, INFOTEK, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 267–275, Jan. 2024
A. Sudianto, H. Sunaryo, S. Suhartini, H. Ahmadi, H. Harianto, and L. Samsu, “Design And Build Of Web-Based Sasak Encyclopedia As An Effort In Preserving Sasak Language,” Aug. 2022. Accessed: Jul. 18, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/2631
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Infotek: Jurnal Informatika dan Teknologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Semua tulisan pada jurnal ini menjadi tanggung jawab penuh penulis. Jurnal Infotek memberikan akses terbuka terhadap siapapun agar informasi dan temuan pada artikel tersebut bermanfaat bagi semua orang. Jurnal Infotek ini dapat diakses dan diunduh secara gratis, tanpa dipungut biaya sesuai dengan lisense creative commons yang digunakan.
Jurnal Infotek is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Statistik Pengunjung
