EMBODIED EXPERIENCE IN NOVELS WRITTEN BY INDONESIAN BLIND AUTHORS: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY OF PERCEPTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs.v9i2.35203Keywords:
embodied experience; blind authors; perception; Merleau-PontyAbstract
This study aims to describe how embodied experience is presented in novels written by blind Indonesian authors. The scope of the study is focused on the embodied experiences of blind characters in the novels Mata Kedua (2013) and Dunia Tanpa Cahaya (2015) by Ramaditya Adikara, as well as the novel Nafas Sang Pekat (2014) by Nabiel Ghali Azumi. The research employs a qualitative approach using a phenomenological textual analysis method. The analysis is grounded in Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s concepts of the lived body, perception, and being-in-the-world. The data consist of narratives, dialogues, and monologues that represent the bodily experiences of blind characters as they interact with the world, space, and themselves. The findings reveal that embodied experience in these novels is articulated through three main forms: the presence of the world in multisensory perception, spatial orientation through the body, and self-understanding within embodied experience. The findings demonstrate that their world remains present and meaningful through sounds, aromas, touch, and other sensory experiences. Furthermore, the body functions as a center of orientation that enables the subject to inhabit space and establish relations with the environment. Blindness is depicted as a different way of perceiving, living, and making sense of reality. These findings offer an alternative perspective to ableist views that tend to define human ability solely on the basis of visual capacity.
References
Beudaert, A. (2020). Towards an embodied understanding of consumers with disabilities: insights from the field of disability studies. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1534734
Bogart, K. R. (2014). The role of disability self-concept in adaptation to congenital or acquired disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035800
Bogart, K. R., Lund, E. M., & Rottenstein, A. (2018). Disability pride protects self-esteem through the rejection-identification model. Rehabilitation Psychology, 63(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000166
Bolt, D. (2013). Aesthetic Blindness: Symbolism, Realism, and Reality. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 46(3), 93–108. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44030343
Bolt, D. (2024). Blindness and Literature: Critical Engagements with the Representational Binaries of Western Modernity. In D. S. Lynch (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.1523
Cappagli, G., Cocchi, E., & Gori, M. (2017). Auditory and proprioceptive spatial impairments in blind children and adults. Developmental Science, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12374
Chan, K., Murphy, M., Bang, J. W., Sims, J., Kashkoush, J., & Nau, A. (2018). Functional MRI of Sensory Substitution in the Blind. Conference Proceedings: ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference, 2018, 5519–5522. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513622
Eriksson, K. (2025). Minding the body : A critical appraisal of three phenomenological accounts of embodiment in social work literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173241258925
Flynn, S. (2021). Corporeality and critical disability studies: toward an informed epistemology of embodiment. Disability & Society, 36(4), 636–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1755237
Forber-Pratt, A. J., Lyew, D. A., Mueller, C., & Samples, L. B. (2017). Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000134
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., Runswick-cole, K., Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-, K. (2019). Provocations for Critical Disability Studies. Disability & Society, 34(6), 972–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889
Greyling, F. (2020). “Wie is dan blind?” Embodied space in locative narratives by people with visual impairment. 4, 1386–1409. https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2020/v60n4-2a16
Halák, J. (2018). Body schema dynamics in Merleau-Ponty 3 . 1 Introduction : the concept of body schema in Merleau-Ponty ’ s works. In Body Ecology and Emersive Leisure. Routledge.
Heinamaa, S. (2021). On the transcendental undercurrents of phenomenology: the case of the living body. Continental Philosophy Review, 54, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-021-09534-z
Hermeston, R. (2022). Disability stylistics: An illustration based on Pew in Stevenson’s Treasure Island. Language and Literature, 32(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470221122101
Job, X., Kirsch, L., & Auvray, M. (2022). Spatial perspective-taking: insights from sensory impairments. Experimental Brain Research, 240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06221-6
Lahav, O. (2022). Virtual Reality Systems as an Orientation Aid for People Who Are Blind to Acquire New Spatial Information.
Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What’s so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). The World of Perception. Taylor & Francis Group.
Mohajel, N., Soufiani, M., & Asghari, M. (2021). Existential Features of the Body in Merleau-Ponty Phenomenology. 15. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.46602.2872
Nurhana, R. Y., Setyaningrum, W. F., & Puspidalia, Y. S. (2024). Sinestesia pada Kumpulan Puisi Romantis Karya Sapardi Djoko Damono: Kajian Semantik. 295–308. https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs.v7i2. 26413
Paré, S., Bleau, M., Djerourou, I., Malotaux, V., Kupers, R., & Ptito, M. (2021). Spatial navigation with horizontally spatialized sounds in early and late blind individuals. PloS One, 16(2), e0247448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247448
Pence, D. (2018). On the Capacity for Vision Through Sensory Substitution. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 72. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy073
Pietrowiak, K. (2018). Ideas of the Congenitally Blind People on the Sense of Sight and the Ability to See. 81–101.
Porkertová, H. (2020). “ Almost Equal ”: Confronting Norms and Normality in Experiencing Visual Disability. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520945364
Ribeiro, R. (2014). The Role of Experience in Perception. 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9318-0
Rogge, A.-K., Hamacher, D., Cappagli, G., Kuhne, L., Hötting, K., Zech, A., Gori, M., & Röder, B. (2021). Balance, gait, and navigation performance are related to physical exercise in blind and visually impaired children and adolescents. Experimental Brain Research, 239(4), 1111–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06038-3
Ruan, L., Hamilton-Fletcher, G., Beheshti, M., Hudson, T. E., Porfiri, M., & Rizzo, J.-R. (2025). Multi-faceted sensory substitution using wearable technology for curb alerting: a pilot investigation with persons with blindness and low vision. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 20(6), 1884–1897. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2463541
Schinazi, V. R., Thrash, T., & Chebat, D.-R. (2016). Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 7(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1375
Schubert, T. (2022). Multisensory processing without vision. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00021-7
Shildrick, M. (2015). Living On; Not Getting Better. Feminist Review, 111, 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.22
Singh, R., & Chopra, G. (2018). Don’t Stare at Me! Exploring the Lived Experiences of Adults with Disability. 5(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2018.5.1.2
Sousa, A. D. E. (2018). The Lived Body As Pre-Reflective Consciousness: Merleau-Ponty on the Cogito. 63, 7–20. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2018.1.01
Toro, J., Kiverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2020). The Ecological-Enactive Model of Disability: Why Disability Does Not Entail Pathological Embodiment. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 11-2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01162
Uboldi, S., Bortolotti, A., Candeloro, G., Marasco, A., Sardella, F., Tartari, M., & Sacco, P. L. (2025). From Touch to Mental Imagery : The Embodied Aesthetic Experience of Late ‑ Blind People Engaged in the Tactile Exploration of Enrico Castellani ’ s Pseudo ‑ Braille Surface. In Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry (Vol. 49, Issue 3). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-025-09904-9
Wehinger, D. (2025). “The Union of the Soul and the Body”: Merleau-Ponty on Being in the World. 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09740-7
Wehrle, M. (2020). Being a Body and Having a Body. The Twofold Temporality of Embodied Intentionality. 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09610-z
Yuli, E. M., & Jaeka, F. (2025). Batasan dan Tantangan: Eksplorasi Konsep Demarkasi Teks Sastra Modern dalam Kajian Linguistik. 2012, 863–879. https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs. v8i3. 32617
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Made Astika, Faruk, Pujiharto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
