Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Konsep Diferensial Berbasis Konflik Kognitif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v4i2.511Keywords:
reasoning, connection, disposition, teaching materials, cognitive conflictAbstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the validity and practicality of teaching materials in the form of RPP and LKS. This type of research is research and development (R & D) with the design of teaching materials (prototype), interview guides (in-depth-interview), observation sheet, where the subject is a school student in one of high school in Cimahi city. Research data were collected through diagnostic tests, evaluation tests, interviews, and observations. The research results consist of three aspects. The first aspect of validity: validator assessment of refined product obtains criteria very valid for RPP and TKM, while for LKS fulfill valid criteria. The two elements of practicality according to the teacher and student ratings: RPP, LKS, and TKM as a whole acquire possible and practical criteria. The three aspects of instructional learning: the percentage of learning activities at the second and third meetings has reached 70.56% with reasonably practicable criteria.
References
Agustin, R. D. (2016). Kemampuan penalaran matematika mahasiswa melalui pendekatan problem solving. Pedagogia, 5(2), 179-188. Crossref.
Ainun, N. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa madrasah aliyah melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe teams games tournament. Jurnal Peluang, 4(1), 55-63.
Dwiningrum, S., Mardiyana, & Pramudya, I. (2016). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematis pada materi persamaan garis lurus ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2. Diambil dari http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id.
Firmasari, S., & Pramuditya, S. A. (2018). Desain bahan ajar analisis real dengan taksonomi solo dilengkapi soal-soal bentuk superitem. Jurnal Elemen, 4(1), 20-33. Crossref.
Gazali, R. Y. (2016). Pengembangan bahan ajar matematika untuk siswa SMP berdasarkan teori belajar Ausubel. Pythagoras; Jurnal Pendiidkan Matematika, 11(2), 182-192. Crossref.
Hapizah. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen kemampuan penalaran matematis mahasiswa pada mata kuliah persamaan diferensial. Jurnal Kreano, 5(1), 73-81.
Inayah, N. (2016a). Pengaruh kemampuan penalaran matematis (mathematical reasoning) dan gaya kognitif terhadap kemampuan komunikasi pada materi statistika siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri di Kota Palu. Aksioma; Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 37-45. Crossref.
Inayah, N. (2016b). Pengaruh kemampuan penalaran matematis dan gaya kognitif terhadap kemampuan komunikasi dan koneksi pada materi statistika siswa SMA, 2(5), 74-80.
Nursyahidah, F., Saputro, B. A., & Prayitno, M. (2016). Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa smp dalam belajar garis dan sudut dengan geogebra. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 13. Crossref.
Ridwan, M. (2017). Profil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 193-206. Crossref.
Rohana. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan penalaran matematis mahasiswa calon guru melalui pembelajaran reflektif. Infinity; Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 4(1), 105-119. Crossref.
Saputri, I., Susanti, E., & Aisyah, N. (2017). Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa menggunakan pendekatan metaphorical thinking pada materi perbandingan kelas VIII di SMPN 1 Indralaya Utara. Jurnal Elemen, 3(1), 15-24. Crossref.
Setiawan, W. (2015). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP dengan menggunakan model penemuan terbimbing. P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 2(1).
Sumartini, T. S. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Mosharafa; Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(April).
Sya’diah, H., & Safitri, P. T. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kuantum berbantuan software Wingeom terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. Fibonacci; Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 1(2), 59-70.
Zaenab, S. (2015). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa melalui pendekatan problem posing di kelas X IPA 1 SMA Negeri 9 Malang. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(1), 90-97. Crossref.
Sumarmo, U. (2015). Pembelajaran keterampilan membaca matematik pada siswa sekolah menengah. Dalam Kumpulan makalah berpikir dan disposisi matematika serta pembelajarannya. (Suryadi, D, Turmudi, Nurlaelah, E, Editor). Hal. 1-23. Bandung: FMIPA UPI.
Sumarmo, U. (2015). Improving the ability of mathematical higher order thinking through inductive-deductive learning aproach. Dalam Kumpulan makalah berpikir dan disposisi matematika serta pembelajarannya. (Suryadi, D, Turmudi, Nurlaelah, E, Editor). Hal.63-74. Bandung: FMIPA UPI.
Sumarmo, U. (2015). Evaluasi dalam pembelajaran matematika. Dalam Kumpulan makalah berpikir dan disposisi matematika serta pembelajarannya. (Suryadi, D, Turmudi, Nurlaelah, E, Editor). Hal.189-211. Bandung: FMIPA UPI.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
