The commognitive perspective of teaching skills of prospective mathematics teachers in microteaching subjects

Authors

  • Moh Zayyadi Mathematics Education Department, University of Madura, East Java http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2621-7238
  • Toto Nusantara Mathematics Education Department, State University of Malang, East Java
  • Harfin Lanya Mathematics Education Department, University of Madura, East Java

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i1.4129

Keywords:

commognitive, microteaching, teaching skills

Abstract

This study aims to describe the teaching skills of prospective mathematics education teachers in micro-teaching subjects from a commognitive perspective. This type of research is qualitative research. The research subjects consisted of 15 students of the 2015 Mathematics Education Study Program class, which were taking micro-teaching courses. The instrument used in this study was a rubric sheet—an assessment of prospective teachers' teaching skills. Data analysis techniques used are data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion collection. The results showed that: Prospective mathematics education teachers in preliminary activities often use the word usage component, visual mediator, routine and do not use the narrative component. In the core activities of learning mathematics, teacher candidates use four components commognitive, which are the use of words, visual mediators, routine, and narrative. In the selection of mathematics education, teacher candidates only use the word use component. Commognitive provides an overview of mathematical cognitive-communication and content in the learning carried out.

References

Bilen, K. (2015). Effect of micro teaching technique on teacher candidates’ beliefs regarding mathematics teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 609-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.590

Cabahug, J. A. (2012). The use of Bruner’s modes of representations in teaching factoring seconddegree polynomials. International Journal of Education, 1(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.7718/iamure.ije.v1i1.102

Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., & Glass, B. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: An``experiment''model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 6(3), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025162108648

Kazu, İ. Y. (1996). Endüstriyel mesleki ve teknik ortaöğretim kurumlarındaki işletmelerde meslek eğitimi uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi (Bursa, Adıyaman, Diyarbakır, Elazığ ve Malatya illeri örneği) [The Evaluation of cooperative education programs at post-secondary technical and vocational education institutes in Turkey].

Kilic, A. (2010). Learner-Centered Micro Teaching in Teacher Education. Online Submission, 3(1), 77-100.

Külahçı, Ş. G. (1994). The experience of the university of Fırat, technical faculty of education in micro education second evaluation. Eğitim ve Bilim, 18(2), 36-44.

Leinhardt, G. (1990). Capturing craft knowledge in teaching. Educational researcher, 19(2), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019002018

Mahmud, I., & Rawshon, S. (2013). Micro teaching to improve teaching method: An analysis on students’ perspectives. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 1(4), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0146976

Metzuyanim, E. H., & Tabach, M. (2018). The commognitive theory framework: From theory to implementation. In Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (Ed.), K-12 Mathematics Education in Israel: Issues and Innovations, pp. 343-350. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813231191_0038

Mosvold, R. (2016). Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the southern african association for research in mathematics, science and technology education (SAARMSTE), Pretoria South Africa SAARMSTE, 186-195.

Ngin, C. S. (2018). Examining a teacher's use of multiple representations in the teaching of percentages: A commognitive perspective. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

Remesh, A. (2013). Microteaching, an efficient technique for learning effective teaching. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 18(2), 158-163. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3724377/

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944

Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2016). Communicational perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics: Prologue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9638-7

Tasara, I. (2017). Commognitive analysis of a teacher’s mathematical discourse on the derivative. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 37.

Tuset, G. A. (2018). A commognitive lens to study pre-service teachers’ teaching in the context of achieving a goal of ambitious mathematics teaching. In Proceeding, Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.

Viirman, O. (2015). Explanation, motivation and question posing routines in university mathematics teachers' pedagogical discourse: A commognitive analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(8), 1165-1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1034206

Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., Sulandra, I. M., & Asari, A. R. (2019). Exploring prospective student teacher's question on mathematics teaching practice. JOTSE, 9(2), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.465

Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., Hidayanto, E., & Sulandra, I. M. (2019). A commognitive framework: The process of solving mathematical problems of middle school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.2.7

Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., Sulandra, I., Mand, & Sa'dijah, C. (2020).Content and pedagogical knowledge of prospective teachers in mathematics learning: commognitive framework. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.642131

Supardi, L., Zayyadi, M., Lanya, H., Hasanah, S. I., & Hidayati, S. N. (2021). Commognitive analysis of students' errors in solving high order thinking skills problems. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 950-961. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.2373

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

06-01-2022

How to Cite

Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., & Lanya, H. (2022). The commognitive perspective of teaching skills of prospective mathematics teachers in microteaching subjects. Jurnal Elemen, 8(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i1.4129

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): January

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

 Creative Commons License

Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.