Adversity Quotient (AQ) dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v4i2.701Keywords:
adversity quotient, mathematical creative reasoningAbstract
This study is experimental research that aims to know and examine in depth about the influence of AQ of pre-service mathematics teacher toward the achievement of mathematical creative reasoning ability. The population of this study is the pre-service mathematics teacher in Cimahi City, West Java, Indonesia; while the sample is 60 pre-service mathematics teachers selected purposively. The instruments of this study are tests and non-tests. They are based on the assessment of good characteristics towards students' mathematical creative reasoning abilities, while the non-test instrument is based on the assessment of good characteristics towards AQ. The results of this research show that: (1) AQ gives positive influence to the development of mathematical creative reasoning ability of pre-service mathematics teacher with the influence of 60.9%, while the rest of it (39.1%) is influenced by other factors outside AQ; (2) The mathematical creative reasoning ability of the prospective teacher students is more develop in AQ Climber type, whereas students who have Camper and Quitter AQ types still tend to have thinking patterns in solving problems with imitative reasoning; (3) Students belonging to the Quitter AQ type still tend to have errors related to the idea of solving problems and mathematical expressions.References
Aripin, U. (2015). Meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman matematik siswa SMP melalui pendekatan pembelajaran berbasis masalah. P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 2(1), 120-127.
Aziz, A., Ahyan, S., & Fauzi, L. M. (2016). Implementasi model Problem Based Learning (PBL) dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa melalui Lesson Study. Jurnal Elemen, 2(1), 83-91. Crossref.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. Crossref.
Bell, C. A., Wilson, S. M., Higgins, T., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the effects of professional development on teacher knowledge: The case of developing mathematical ideas. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 479-512. Crossref.
Bennu, S. (2012). Adversity Quotient: Kajian kemungkinan pengintegrasiannya dalam pembelajaran matematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(01).
Bergqvist, T., & Lithner, J. (2012). Mathematical reasoning in teachers’ presentations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(2), 252-269. Crossref.
Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., & Sumpter, L. (2008). Upper secondary students’ task reasoning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(1), 1-12. Crossref.
Brown, N. J. S., Furtak, E. M., Timms, M., Nagashima, S. O., & Wilson, M. (2010). The evidence-based reasoning framework: Assessing scientific reasoning. Educational Assessment, 15(3), 123–141. Crossref.
Cheng, P. C. H., & Simon, H. A. (1995). Scientific discovery and creative reasoning with diagrams. The Creative Cognition Approach, 205-228 ST–Scientific discovery and creative.
da Ponte, J. P., Mata-Pereira, J., & Henriques, A. (2012). O raciocÃnio matemático nos alunos do ensino básico e do ensino superior. Práxis Educativa (Brasil), 7(2), 355-377. Crossref.
Dilla, S. C., Hidayat, W., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2018). Faktor gender dan resiliensi dalam pencapaian kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa SMA. Journal of Medives, 2(1), 129-136. Crossref.
Fauziyah, I. N. L., Usodo, B., & Ch, H. E. (2013). Proses berpikir kreatif siswa kelas X dalam memecahkan masalah geometri berdasarkan tahapan Wallas ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ) Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Solusi, 1(1), 1-16.
Herdiman, I. (2017). Penerapan pendekatan open-ended untuk meningkatkan penalaran matematik siswa SMP. JES-MAT (Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika), 3(2), 195-204.
Hershkowitz, R., Tabach, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2017). Creative reasoning and shifts of knowledge in the mathematics classroom. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 25-36. Crossref.
Hidayat, W. (2017). Adversity Quotient dan penalaran kreatif matematis siswa SMA dalam pembelajaran argument driven inquiry pada materi turunan fungsi. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15-28. Crossref.
Hidayat, W., & Sariningsih, R. (2018). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan adversity quotient siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran open ended. Jurnal JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(1), 109-118.
Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). Improving students’ creative mathematical reasoning ability students through adversity quotient and argument driven inquiry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 12005. Crossref.
Holm, J., & Kajander, A. (2012). “I Finally Get It!â€: Developing mathematical understanding during teacher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(5), 563–574. Crossref.
Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21. Crossref.
Isnaeni, S., Fajriyah, L., Risky, E. S., Purwasih, R., & Hidayat, W. (2018). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematis dan kemandirian belajar siswa SMP pada materi persamaan garis lurus. Journal of Medives, 2(1), 107-115. Crossref.
Johar, R., & Yusniarti, S. (2018). The analysis of proportional reasoning problem in the indonesian mathematics textbook for the junior. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 55-68.
Kajander, A., & Jarvis, D. (2009). Report of the working group on elementary mathematics for teaching. Canadian Mathematics Education Forum. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC.
Kasmer, L., & Kim, O.-K. (2011). Using prediction to promote mathematical understanding and reasoning. School Science and Mathematics, 111(1), 20-33. Crossref.
Leonard, L., & Amanah, N. (2014). Pengaruh adversity quotient (AQ) dan kemampuan berpikir kritis terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 28(1), 55-64.
Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM, 49, 937–949. Crossref.
Maya, R., & Ruqoyyah, S. (2018). The Role of contextual teaching and learning on student’s problem solving ability and disposition. JIML-Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 1(1), 31-40.
MZ, Z. A., Risnawati, Kurniati, A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Adversity quotient in mathematics learning (quantitative study on students boarding school in Pekanbaru). International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME), 1(2), 169-176. Crossref.
Novtiar, C., & Aripin, U. (2017). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan kepercayaan diri siswa SMP melalui pendekatan open ended. PRISMA, 6(2), 119-131.
Oliveros, J. C. (2014). Adversity quotient and problem-solving skills in advanced algebra. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 17(1). Crossref.
Pangma, R., Tayraukham, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Causal factors influencing adversity quotient of twelfth grade and third-year vocational students. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 466-470. Crossref.
Permana, Y., & Sumarmo, U. (2007). Mengembangkan kemampuan penalaran dan koneksi matematik siswa SMA melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Educationist, I(2), 116-123.
Phoolka, E. S., & Kaur, N. (2012). Adversity Quotient: A new paradigm to explore. International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, 3(4), 67-78.
Prabawanto, S. (2017). The enhancement of students’ mathematical problem solving ability through teaching with metacognitive scaffolding approach. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1848, p. 040014). AIP Publishing. Crossref.
Rahmi, S., Nadia, R., Hasibah, B., & Hidayat, W. (2017). The relation between self-efficacy toward math with the math communication competence. Infinity Journal, 6(2), 177-182. Crossref.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2010). Manajemen. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Saleh, M., Charitas, R., Prahmana, I., & Isa, M. (2018). Improving the reasoning ability of elementary school student through the indonesian realistic. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 41-54.
Sumarmo, U., Hidayat, W., Zukarnaen, R., Hamidah, H., & Sariningsih, R. (2012). Kemampuan dan disposisi berpikir logis, kritis, dan kreatif matematik (eksperimen terhadap siswa SMA menggunakan pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan strategi Think-Talk-Write). Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 17(1), 17-33. Crossref.
Tresnawati, Hidayat, W., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2017). Kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan kepercayaan diri siswa SMA. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 2(2), 116-122.
Yanti, A. P., & Syazali, M. (2016). Analisis proses berpikir siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika berdasarkan langkah-langkah Bransford dan Stein ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 63-74.
Zulkarnaen, R. (2014). Penerapan pendekatan realistik berbantuan ICT terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa kelas VII. Jurnal Euclid, 3(2), 578-587.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
