Developing an electronic module based on mathematical literacy to enhance students' mathematical reasoning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i1.6915Keywords:
development research, e-module, mathematical literacy, mathematical reasoningAbstract
This study aims to produce an e-module based on mathematical literacy with a valid, effective, and feasible problem-based learning approach to improve students' mathematical reasoning in multivariable calculus material. This research used a development method with the stages: analysis, design, development, and evaluation. The research subjects involved fifth-semester students' mathematics education department. Small group trials with 17 students and large group trials with 35 students. The research instruments included validation sheets, student worksheets, questionnaires, and mathematical reasoning ability test questions. Data collection used the results of the validation as validity, test results as effectiveness, and the results of the questionnaire as feasibility. Data analysis was descriptively and qualitatively. The research produced an e-module based on mathematical literacy with a problem-based learning approach that is valid, very effective, and very feasible for improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities in multivariable calculus material. The developed e-module has the potential for significant differences and increases mathematical reasoning abilities. In addition, e-module can be used as an alternative solution to electronic teaching.References
Akkus, M. (2016). The common core state standards for mathematics. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.61754
Aulia, E. T., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2022). Developing interactive e-module based on realistic mathematics education approach and mathematical literacy ability. Jurnal Elemen, 8(1), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i1.4569
Bergqvist, T., & Lithner, J. (2012). Mathematical reasoning in teachers’ presentations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(2), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.12.002
Bozkurt, G., & Ruthven, K. (2017). Classroom-based professional expertise: A mathematics teacher’s practice with technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9732-5
Brew, A., & Saunders, C. (2020). Making sense of research-based learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102935
Çetinkaya, L. (2019). The effects of problem based mathematics teaching through mobile applications on success. Egitim ve Bilim, 44(197), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.8119
Chen, T. Y., Wei, H. W., Cheng, Y. C., Leu, J. S., Shih, W. K., & Hsu, N. I. (2015). Integrating an e-book software with vector graphic technology on cloud platform. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 1012–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.572
Choi, J., & Walters, A. (2018). Exploring the impact of small-group synchronous discourse sessions in online math learning. Online Learning Journal, 22(4), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1511
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction. In in educational technology research and development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9606-0
Etherington, M. (2011). Investigative primary science: A problem-based learning approach. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(9), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n10.1
Fernández, C., Llinares, S., & Rojas, Y. (2020). Prospective mathematics teachers’ development of noticing in an online teacher education program. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01149-7
Genc, M., & Erbas, A. K. (2019). Secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptions of mathematical literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(3), 222–237. https://www.ijemst.com/index.php/ijemst/article/view/611/179
Haara, F. O., Bolstad, O. H., & Jenssen, E. S. (2021). Research on mathematical literacy in schools - aim, approach and attention. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 285–313. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9512
Hardianti, S., & Zulkardi, Z. (2019). Students mathematical literacy abilities in solving PISA type math problem with LRT context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012016
Harel, G., Fuller, E., Reid, D. A., & Knipping, C. (2013). Proof in mathematics education: Research, learning, and teaching. ZDM, 45(3), 497–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0497-3
Herbert, S., Vale, C., Bragg, L. A., Loong, E., & Widjaja, W. (2015). A framework for primary teachers’ perceptions of mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Educational Research, 74, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.09.005
Hidayah, I. N., Sa'dijah, C., Subanji, & Sudirman. (2020). Characteristics of students’ abductive reasoning in solving algebra problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.11.3.11869.347-362
Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning toward enhancing mathematical thinking: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(4), 3548–3561. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Vol%2016%20Issue%204%20August%202021/16_4_51.pdf
Junianto, & Wijaya, A. (2019). Developing students’ mathematical literacy through problem based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012035
Kalobo, L. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of learners’ proficiency in statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2016.1215965
Keengwe, J., & Georgina, D. (2012). The digital course training workshop for online learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 17(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9164-x
Kemdikbud. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang standar nasional pendidikan tinggi [Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2020 concerning national higher education standards]. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.
Leong, K. E., & Alexander, N. (2014). College students attitude and mathematics achievement using web based homework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6), 609–615. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1220a
Letchumanan, M., & Tarmizi, R. A. (2010). Utilization of e-book among university mathematics students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 580–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.080
Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(6), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0867-3
Loong, E. Y. K., & Herbert, S. (2012). Student perspectives of web-based mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.002
MacLeod, M., & Veen, J. T. (2020). Scaffolding interdisciplinary project-based learning: A case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1646210
Mailizar, M., & Fan, L. (2020). Indonesian teachers’ knowledge of ICT and the use of ICT in secondary mathematics teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110352
Mamolo, L. A. (2022). Online learning and students’ mathematics motivation, self-efficacy, and anxiety in the “new normal. Education Research International, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9439634
Merritt, J., Lee, M. Y., Rillero, P., & Kinach, B. M. (2017). Problem-based learning in K-8 mathematics and science education: A literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1674
Mooij, S. M. M., Kirkham, N. Z., Raijmakers, M. E. J., Maas, H. L. J., & Dumontheil, I. (2020). Should online math learning environments be tailored to individuals’ cognitive profiles? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 191, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104730
Morgan, G. A., Barrett, K. C., Leech, N. L., & Gloeckner, G. W. (2019). IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429287657
Napitupulu, E., Suryadi, D., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2016). Cultivating upper secondary students’ mathematical reasoning-ability and attitude towards mathematics through problem-based learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.2.3542.117-128
Norqvist, M. (2018). The effect of explanations on mathematical reasoning tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1340679
Norvaiša, R. (2021). The aims of teaching mathematics: Mathematical literacy vs mathematical reasoning. Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys, 61, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.15388/LMR.2020.22472
Nursakiah, N., Arriah, F., & Dharma, S. (2022). Developing mathematical literacy test with context of Bugis-Makassar local wisdom for junior high school students. Jurnal Elemen, 8(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i1.4049
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving (revised ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy : Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100. http://www.sciepub.com/reference/297148
Owston, R. D., Sinclair, M., & Wideman, H. (2008). Blended learning for professional development: An evaluation of a program for middle school mathematics and science teachers. Teachers College Record, 110(5), 1033–1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811000503
Park, J. H., Kim, H. Y., & Lim, S. B. (2019). Development of an electronic book accessibility standard for physically challenged individuals and deduction of a production guideline. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 64, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.12.004
Pugalee, D. K. (1999). Constructing a model of mathematical literacy. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies. Issues and Ideas, 73(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659909599632
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Riyanto, S., & Hatmawan, A. A. (2020). Metode riset penelitian kuantitatif penelitian di bidang manajemen, teknik [Research methods quantitative research in management, engineering]. Deepublish.
Rizki, L. M., & Priatna, N. (2019). Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088
Rogers, K. C., & Steele, M. D. (2016). Graduate teaching assistants’ enactment of reasoning-and-proving tasks in a content course for elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(4), 372–419. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.4.0372
Schettino, C. (2016). Framework for problem-based learning: Teaching mathematics with a relational problem-based pedagogy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1602
Subanji, S., & Nusantara, T. (2016). Thinking process of pseudo construction in mathematics concepts. International Education Studies, 9(2), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p17
Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Gale Cengage Learning.
Tezer, M., Yildiz, E. P., Bozkurt, S., & Tangul, H. (2019). The influence of online mathematics learning on prospective teachers mathematics achievement: The role of independent and collaborative learning. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(4), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v11i4.4361
Utari, T. S. G., Kartasasmita, B. G., & Julika, C. (2019). The application of situation-based learning strategy to improve literacy skills, mathematical problem-solving ability and mathematical self-efficacy at senior high school students. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 6(1), 89–102. https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol6Iss1/6106_Sutarto_2019_TD_R.pdf
Williams, J. J., Tunks, J., Gonzalez-Carriedo, R., Faulkenberry, E., & Middlemiss, W. (2020). Supporting mathematics understanding through funds of knowledge. Urban Education, 55(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916654523
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
