Crafting math minds: A bibliometric odyssey into innovative didactical designs for learning (2006-2023)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i1.24935Keywords:
bibliometrics, didactical design, mathematics educationAbstract
The importance of Didactical Design in mathematics education must be addressed. Didactical Design is essential in mathematics education because it can optimize learning. Efforts to design learning experiences that combine didactic and design principles can lead students to acquire knowledge correctly and epistemically. This research aims to capture the landscape of previous research relevant to Didactical Design in Mathematics Education. This study constitutes a literature review research, wherein 56 publications were gathered from the Scopus database. These publications were subsequently subjected to bibliometric analysis with the assistance of the VOSviewer application. The analysis results show a rapid increase in publications since 2019, primarily focusing on didactic design, barriers to student learning, mathematics education, and retrospective analysis. The study also identified the emergence of new themes in Didactical Design research, such as the study of specific mathematical competencies and the integration of technology in design, e-learning, augmented reality, and STEM. Several implications are presented as helpful information for scientists and stakeholders.References
Angraini, L. M. (2017). Didactical design of mathematical reasoning in mathematical basic concepts of courses. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1), 1–12. https://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/JNPM/article/view/3943/0
Angraini, L. M. (2021). Didactical design of mathematical reasoning in mathematical basic concepts of courses. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1), 1–12.
Brandenburger, B., & Teichmann, M. (2022). Looking for participation – Adapting participatory learningoriented-didactic design elements of FabLabs in learning factories. 12th Conference on Learning Factories, CLF2022, 9(April).
Burgos, M., & Chaverri Hernández, J. J. (2022). Knowledge and competencies of prospective teachers for the creation of proportionality problems. Acta Scientiae, 24(6), 270–306. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7061
Fuadiah, N. F., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi, T. (2019). Teaching and learning activities in classroom and their impact on student misunderstanding: A case study on negative integers. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12127a
García-Perales, R., & Palomares-Ruiz, A. (2020). Education in programming and mathematical learning: Functionality of a programming language in educational processes. Sustainability, 12(23), 10129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310129
Hudson, B. (2011). Didactical design for technology enhanced learning. Beyond Fragmentation: Didactics, Learning and Teaching in Europe, 223–238.
Jannah, R. R., Apriliya, S., & Karlimah. (2017). Didactical design material units of distance and speed to developed mathematical connection in elementary school. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 180(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/180/1/012022
Kotsyuba, I. Y., Sokolov, S. A., Shikov, A. N., & Valdaitceva, M. V. (2022). The system of support for the didactic design of academic disciplines of the humanities and socio-economic cycle. Applied Mathematics and Control Sciences, 2, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.15593/2499-9873/2022.2.06
Marfuah, M., Suryadi, D., Turmudi, T., & Isnawan, M. G. (2022). Providing online learning situations for in-service mathematics teachers’ external transposition knowledge during COVID-19 pandemic: Case of Indonesia. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(1), pp69-84. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.1.2388
Maulana, M., Rahman, A. A., & Aminah, M. (2022). MURRDERR strategy: Developing creative characters of elementary school prospective teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15131a
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Douglas. (2009). Preferred eeporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889–896. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
Nur’aeni, E., Muharram, M. R. W., & Sriwianti, S. (2019). Didactical design of mathematics teaching based on gobak sodor traditional games in primary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012015
Nyman, R., & Kilhamn, C. (2015). Enhancing engagement in algebra: Didactical strategies implemented and discussed by teachers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(6), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.965790
Olsson, J., & Granberg, C. (2022). Teacher-student interaction supporting students’ creative mathematical reasoning during problem solving using Scratch. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2022.2105567
Pauji, I., Hadi, H., & Juandi, D. (2023). Systematic literature review: Analysis of learning obstacle in didactical design research on geometry material. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2895–2906. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2474
Prabowo, A., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., Juandi, D., & Junaedi, I. (2022). Learning obstacles in the making of lesson plans by prospective mathematics teacher students. Education Research International, 2022, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2896860
Prediger, S. (2019). Theorizing in design research. Avances de Investigación En Educación Matemática, 15, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i15.265
Rohaeti, E. E., Nurjaman, A., Sari, I. P., Bernard, M., & Hidayat, W. (2019). Developing didactic design in triangle and rectangular toward students mathematical creative thinking through Visual Basic for PowerPoint. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 042068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042068
Rosas, G. A. P., Polo, M. J. A., Hermosilla, A. S., Delgado, A., & Huamaní, E. L. (2023). Development of a web system to improve and reinforce learning in mathematics in primary and secondary students in Peru. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(5s), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i5s.6597
Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design tools in didactical research: instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09338513
Salinas, P., González-Mendívil, E., Quintero, E., Ríos, H., Ramírez, H., & Morales, S. (2013). The development of a didactic prototype for the learning of mathematics through augmented reality. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.008
Schreiberova, P., & Moravkova, Z. (2023). The use of geogebra in technical mathematics. MM Science Journal, 2023(1). https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2023_03_2022112
Solares, D., & Block, D. (2021). Mujeres que leen, escriben y calculan para participar en la economía familiar y local. Avances de Investigación En Educación Matemática, 19, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i19.396
Supriadi. (2022). Elementary school students reflection: Didactical design analysis on integer and fraction operations on mathematical concepts with Sundanese ethnomathematics learning. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(4), 192-199. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.04.19
Supriadi, S. (2019). Didactic design of Sundanese ethnomathematics learning for primary school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.9
Supriyadi, E., Suryadi, D., Turmudi, T., Prabawanto, S., Juandi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2023). Didactical design research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 18, 153–160.
Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical design research (DDR) dalam pengembangan pembelajaran. In Prosiding seminar nasional matematika dan pendidikan matematika (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Teichmann, M., Vladova, G., & Gronau, N. (2023). Conception of subject-oriented learning - A meso-didactic design framework for learning scenarios for manufacturing. SSRN Electronic Journal, May. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4457995
Wahyuningrum, A. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2017). Epistemological obstacles on the topic of ratio and proportion among junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012066
Wahyuningrum, A. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi, T. (2019). Learning obstacles among indonesian eighth graders on ratio and proportion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012046
Wang, W., Dong, X., Qu, J., Lin, Y., & Liu, L. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of microtia-related publications from 2006 to 2020. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, 19(1), 1–5.
Zyoud, S. H., Al-Jabi, S. W., & Sweileh, W. M. (2015). Worldwide research productivity of paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: A bibliometric analysis (2003-2012). Human and Experimental Toxicology, 34(1), 12–23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dadan Dasari; Ilham Muhammad; Dadang Juandi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
