Analisis Generalisabilitas Multi Faset pada Instrumen Penalaran Matematika SMP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v3i2.398Keywords:
multi-facet design, mathematics reasoning instrument, G-Study, D-StudyAbstract
The aims of this study is to determine the internal consistency or reliability coefficient of the developed mathematics reasoning instruments in Junior High School by using generalizability theory multi facet, px(i:r). The instrument are consisting 5 indicator which each of that are valued by each rater. This research method is three-way analysis of variance of multi facet design on G-Study by which the variance comonents are person, rater, item and the interaction between person and items, and the error. Both of G-Study and D-Study design is nested design. The result shows that the coefficient of G-Study is 0.66898. Hence, the next step is using those coefficient for D-Study analysis which lead the conclusion that mathematics reasoning instrument has satisfied the level of observation on large facet and its coefficient is 0.73834 or 74%. To sum up, raters have to use the indicators of reasoning instrument which consist of 1,2,3,4 and 5 components. The design of P x (I:R) - I Random, R Fixed (P = 30, R = 5 dan I = 4) has been satisfied the minimum criteria of conclusion which has been reach 0.70.References
Basrowi, & Siskandar. (2012). Evaluasi Belajar Berbasis Kinerja. Bandung: Karya Putra Darwati.
Brennan, R. L. (2000, December 1). Performance Assessments from the perspective of Generalizability Theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(4), 339-353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01466210022031796
Briesch, A., Chafouleas, S. M., & Johnson, A. (2016). Use of Generalizability Theory Within K–12 School-Based Assessment: A Critical Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Journal Applied Measurement in Education, 29(2), 83-107. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1138955
Briesch, A., Swaminathan, H., Welsh, M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2014). Generalizability theory: A practical guide to study design, implementation, and interpretation. Journal of School Psychology, 52(1), 13-35. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.008.
Hudojo, H. (2001). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Lampiran Permendikbud Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 Tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum SMP/MTs. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.
Lohman, D. (2007). Reasoning and Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mardapi, D. (2004). Penyusunan Tes Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Litera.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn (Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education ed.). (J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell, Eds.) Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from https://www.pearsoned.com/wp-content/uploads/m14-res_practice.pdf
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. USA: NCTM.
Ndraha, F. (2013). “Nilai Strategis memandang Bukti Geometri sebagai Prosep dalam Pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY. Yogyakarta: UNY.
Permendiknas Nomor 22 Tahun 2006. (2006, Mei 23). Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta.
Prabowo, A., & Ristiani, E. (2011). Rancang Bangun Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Keruangan Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Keruangan Hubert Maier dan Identifikasi Penskoran Berdasar Teori Van Hielle. Jurnal Kreano ISSN: 2086-2334, 2(2).
Retnowati, T. H. (2009). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Proses dan Produk Karya Seni Lukis. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 12(2).
Rosnawati, R. (2013). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Siswa SMP Indonesia Pada TIMSS 2011. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA 18 Mei 2013. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Saragih, S. (2011, November). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran dan Locus of Control terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan, 41(2), 108-119.
Stylianides, G. (2008). An Analytic Framework of Reasoning-and-Proving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 9-16.
Susilaningsih, E. (2011). Instrumen Penilaian Praktikum Kimia dan Estimasi Reliabilitasnya Dengan Koefisien Generalisabilitas. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia VI (pp. 87-97). Solo: Program Studi Kimia, FKIP UNS.
Susongko, P. (2010). Studi Generalizabilitas Tes Tipe Dua Facet dengan Menggunakan Analisis Varian Tiga Jalur. Oseatek.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
