Research trends on flipped classrooms of mathematics creative thinking, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i2.15150Keywords:
content analysis, creative thinking skills, critical thinking skills, flipped classroom, mathematics educational journals, problem-solving skillsAbstract
Some studies discussed learning outcomes, challenges, and the effect of media learning on flipped classrooms of mathematics creative thinking (MCeT), critical thinking (MCiT), and problem-solving (MPS) skills. None of the studies reviewed the research information. This study aimed to examine trend research by year and the diversity of research methods, quantitative research designs, research subjects, mathematics topics, research variables, data collection tools, test designs, data analysis methods, and learning media in articles published in Scopus, Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC), and Garba Rujukan Digital (Garuda) databases of mathematics educational journals from January 2018 to April 2023. The method of this study was the content analysis method. Twenty-two articles were evaluated in this study. The results showed that the research trend by year was increasing. The most type of research methods, quantitative research design, research subjects, mathematics topic, research variables, data collecting tools, kind of test design, data analysis techniques, and learning media were quasi-experimental design, eighth-grade junior high school students, three-dimensional shape, problem-solving, test sheet, pretest-posttest, t-test, and video, respectively. This study gave insights to other researchers for future decision-making on flipped classrooms of MCeT, MCiT, and MPS skills.
References
Abosalem, Y. (2015). Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills. ICSIT 2018 - 9th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, Proceedings, 4(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11
Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Amit, M. (2011). Developing the skills of critical and creative thinking by probability teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1087–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.243
Al-Zoubi, A. M., & Suleiman, L. M. (2021). Flipped classroom strategy based on critical thinking skills: Helping fresh female students acquire derivative concept. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14244a
Alkhatib, O. J. (2019). A framework for implementing higher-order thinking skills (problem-solving, critical thinking, creative thinking, and decision-making) in engineering humanities. 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences, ASET 2019, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714232
Ariani, D. N., Sumantri, M. S., & Wibowo, F. C. (2022). The impact of android module-based inquiry flipped classroom learning on mathematics problem solving and creative thinking ability. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(24), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i24.35749
Atwa, Z., Sulayeh, Y., Abdelhadi, A., Jazar, H. A., & Eriqat, S. (2022). Flipped classroom effects on grade 9 students’ critical thinking skills, psychological stress, and academic achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15240a
Azizah, T., Fauzan, A., & Harisman, Y. (2022). "Flipped classroom type peer instruction-based learning” based on a website to improve student’s problem solving. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p325-348
Beatty, B. J., Merchant, Z., & Albert, M. (2019). Analysis of student use of video in a flipped classroom. TechTrends, 63(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0169-1
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
Bhat, A., & Aminabhavi, V. (2011). Home environment and psychosocial competence of adolescents. Journal of Psychology, 2(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09764224.2011.11885464
Chang, C.-Y., Kao, C.-H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Facilitating students’ critical thinking and decision making performances. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 32–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26921132
Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of big data – evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48(January), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
Ebiendele Ebosele Peter. (2012). Critical thinking: Essence for teaching mathematics and mathematics problem solving skills. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 5(3), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMCSR11.161
Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (Issue ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1.). Insight Assessment.
Fatahillah, A., Puspitasari, I. D., & Hussen, S. (2020). The development of schoology web-based learning media with geogebra to improve the ICT literacy on quadratic functions. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(3), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i3.10692
Fauzi, A., & Pradipta, I. W. (2018). Research methods and data analysis techniques in education articles published by Indonesian biology educational journals. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5889
Gao, X., & Hew, K. F. (2022). Toward a 5E-based flipped classroom model for teaching computational thinking in elementary school: Effects on student computational thinking and problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 512–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211037757
Garrido, A. (2012). Ai and mathematical education. Education Sciences, 2(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/educ2010022
Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. C. (2012). Classifying k–12 blended learning. INNOSIGHT Institute, May, 1–22. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf
Insorio, A. O., & Macandog, D. M. (2022). Youtube video playlist as mathematics supplementary learning material for blended learning. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 3(2), e02212. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/12490
Joynes, C., Rossignoli, S., & Amonoo-Kuofi, E. F. (2019). 21st century skills: Evidence of issues in definition, demand and delivery for development contexts. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies., August, 1–75. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/14674
Krishnan, P. (2019). A review of the non-equivalent control group post-test-only design. Nurse Researcher, 26(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1582
Li, M., Yin, D., Qiu, H., & Bai, B. (2022). Examining the effects of AI contactless services on customer psychological safety, perceived value, and hospitality service quality during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 31(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1934932
Lin, H., & Larzelere, R. E. (2020). Dual-centered ANCOVA: Resolving contradictory results from Lord’s paradox with implications for reducing bias in longitudinal analyses. Journal of Adolescence, 85, 135–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.11.001
Lin, T.-C., Lin, T.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Research trends in science education from 2008 to 2012: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1346–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.864428
Long, T., Logan, J., & Waugh, M. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the value of using videos as a pre-class learning experience in the flipped classroom. TechTrends, 60(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4
Maharani, H. R. (2014). Creative thinking in mathematics: Are we able to solve mathematical problems in a variety of way?. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education 2014, 120–125.
McCallumore, K., & Sparapani, E. (2010). The importance of the ninth grade on high school graduation rates and student success. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 130.
Nabayra, J. N. (2020). Video-based e-module for mathematics in nature and students’ learning experiences in a flipped classroom. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education …, 43(December), 1–21. http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jsmesea/article/view/8813
Nida, N. K., Usodo, B., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2020). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on the students’ mathematical creative thinking skills. 440(Icobl 2019), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200521.022
Oakes, J. M., & Feldman, H. A. (2001). Statistical power for nonequivalent pretest-posttest designs: The impact of change-score versus ANCOVA models. Evaluation Review, 25(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X0102500101
Ormerod, R. (2021). The fitness and survival of the OR profession in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1650619
Ostrom, A. L., Fotheringham, D., & Bitner, M. J. (2019). Customer acceptance of AI in service encounters: Understanding antecedents and consequences. In P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski, J. C. Spohrer, K. Lyons, L. Patrício, & Y. Sawatani (Eds.), Handbook of Service Science, Volume II (pp. 77–103). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98512-1_5
Papastephanou, M., & Angeli, C. (2007). Critical thinking beyond skill. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(6), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00311.x
Pardo, S. A. (2023). Product design: Factorial experiments. In Statistical Methods and Analyses for Medical Devices (pp. 57–87). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26139-8_6
Paschen, J., Kietzmann, J., & Kietzmann, T. C. (2019). Artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for market knowledge in B2B marketing. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34(7), 1410–1419. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2018-0295
Prakash, D., Mageshwari T, U., Prabakaran, K., & Suguna, A. (2013). Detection of heart diseases by mathematical artificial intelligence algorithm using phonocardiogram signals. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 3(1), 145–150.
Pratama, R. W., Sudiyanto, S., & Riyadi, R. (2019). The development of attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction (ARCS) model based on active learning to improve students’learning motivation. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i1.4044
Puspitasari, R. D., Herlina, K., & Suyatna, A. (2020). A need analysis of STEM-integrated flipped classroom e-module to improve critical thinking skills. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6121
Rahmadani, Herman, T., Dareng, S. Y., & Bakri, Z. (2020). Education for industry revolution 4.0: Using flipped classroom in mathematics learning as alternative. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 0–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032038
Ramadhani, R., Bina, N. S., Sihotang, S. F., Narpila, S. D., & Mazaly, M. R. (2020). Students’ critical mathematical thinking abilities through flip-problem based learning model based on LMS-google classroom. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1), 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012025
Riedl, M. O. (2019). Human-centered artificial intelligence and machine learning. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(1), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.117
Rintayati, P., Lukitasari, H., & Syawaludin, A. (2020). Development of two-tier multiple choice test to assess Indonesian elementary students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14133A
Sanders, S. (2016). Critical and creative thinkers in mathematics classrooms. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 6(1), 19–27.
Sari, D. M., Ikhsan, M., & Abidin, Z. (2018). The development of learning instruments using the creative problem-solving learning model to improve students’ creative thinking skills in mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012018
Setiana, D. S., Purwoko, R. Y., & Sugiman. (2021). The application of mathematics learning model to stimulate mathematical critical thinking skills of senior high school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.509
Shai, S. S. (2022). Practice research on mathematics critical thinking ability cultivation strategy based on flipped classroom. Journal of Educational Research and Policies, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2022.04(08).35
Simanjuntak, M. P., Hutahaean, J., Marpaung, N., & Ramadhani, D. (2021). Effectiveness of problem-based learning combined with computer simulation on students’ problem-solving and creative thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14330a
Soc, K., Vol, M. E., & Data, B. (2020). 인공지능 (artificial intelligence)과 대학수학교육 [Artificial intelligence and university mathematics education]. 2017, 354–359.
Sriwongchai, A. (2015). Developing the mathematics learning management model for improving creative thinking in Thailand. International Education Studies, 8(11), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n11p77
Sukenti, D., Tambak, S., & Siregar, E. (2021). Learning assessment for madrasah teacher: Strengthening Islamic psychosocial and emotional intelligence. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.552
Sürücü, L., & Maslakçi, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3 SE-Articles), 2694–2726. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
Susetyarini, E., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Trend of critical thinking skill researches in biology education journals across Indonesia: From research design to data analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13135a
Tabieh, A. A. S., & Hamzeh, M. (2022). The impact of blended-flipped learning on mathematical creative thinking skills. Journal of Educators Online, 19(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2022.19.3.15
Turmuzi, M., Suharta, I. G. P., & Suparta, I. N. (2023). Ethnomathematical research in mathematics education journals in Indonesia: A case study of data design and analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2220. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12836
Vogelsang, K., Droit, A., & Liere-Netheler, K. (2019). Designing a flipped classroom course-a process model. 14(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18417/emisa.14.4
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029
Wei, X., Cheng, I. L., Chen, N. S., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Dong, Y., Zhai, X., & Kinshuk. (2020). Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1461–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x
Wijaya, T. T., Li, L., Hermita, N., Putra, Z. H., & Alim, J. A. (2021). Helping junior high school student to learn fibonacci sequence with video-based learning. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(11), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i11.23097
Wu, X. W., & Lai, D. (2015). Comparison of statistical methods for pretest–posttest designs in terms of type I error probability and statistical power. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 44(2), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2013.775295
Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1
Xu, Y., Shieh, C. H., van Esch, P., & Ling, I. L. (2020). AI customer service: Task complexity, problem-solving ability, and usage intention. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(4), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.03.005
Yanuarto, W. N., & Hapsari, I. (2022). The model of creative thinking, critical thinking, and entrepreneurial skills among university students. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(2), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i2.7467
Yayuk, E., Purwanto, As’Ari, A. R., & Subanji. (2020). Primary school students’ creative thinking skills in mathematics problem solving. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1281–1295. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1281
Yuliana, Wijayanti, S., & Yuwono, M. R. (2022). Tantangan pembelajaran matematika mPBL pada flipped classroom untuk membangun kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa [The challenge of learning mathematics of mPBL in a flipped classroom to build students’ critical thinking skills]. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 101–118.
Zakiyah, Z., Karlimah, K., & Hidayat, S. (in press). Fostering creative mathematical thinking with a flipped classroom approach. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education.
Zanzotto, F. M. (2019). Viewpoint: Human-in-the-loop artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 64, 243–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11345
Zhang, D. (2017). Effects of visual working memory training and direct instruction on geometry problem solving in students with geometry difficulties. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 117–138. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1141989
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
