Crafting math minds: A bibliometric odyssey into innovative didactical designs for learning (2006-2023)


  • Dadan Dasari Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, West Java
  • Ilham Muhammad Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, West Java
  • Dadang Juandi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, West Java



bibliometrics, didactical design, mathematics education


The importance of Didactical Design in mathematics education must be addressed. Didactical Design is essential in mathematics education because it can optimize learning. Efforts to design learning experiences that combine didactic and design principles can lead students to acquire knowledge correctly and epistemically. This research aims to capture the landscape of previous research relevant to Didactical Design in Mathematics Education. This study constitutes a literature review research, wherein 56 publications were gathered from the Scopus database. These publications were subsequently subjected to bibliometric analysis with the assistance of the VOSviewer application. The analysis results show a rapid increase in publications since 2019, primarily focusing on didactic design, barriers to student learning, mathematics education, and retrospective analysis. The study also identified the emergence of new themes in Didactical Design research, such as the study of specific mathematical competencies and the integration of technology in design, e-learning, augmented reality, and STEM. Several implications are presented as helpful information for scientists and stakeholders.

Author Biography

Ilham Muhammad, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, West Java

Mahasiswa Magister Pendidikan Matematika


Angraini, L. M. (2017). Didactical design of mathematical reasoning in mathematical basic concepts of courses. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1), 1–12.

Angraini, L. M. (2021). Didactical design of mathematical reasoning in mathematical basic concepts of courses. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1), 1–12.

Brandenburger, B., & Teichmann, M. (2022). Looking for participation – Adapting participatory learningoriented-didactic design elements of FabLabs in learning factories. 12th Conference on Learning Factories, CLF2022, 9(April).

Burgos, M., & Chaverri Hernández, J. J. (2022). Knowledge and competencies of prospective teachers for the creation of proportionality problems. Acta Scientiae, 24(6), 270–306.

Fuadiah, N. F., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi, T. (2019). Teaching and learning activities in classroom and their impact on student misunderstanding: A case study on negative integers. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 407–424.

García-Perales, R., & Palomares-Ruiz, A. (2020). Education in programming and mathematical learning: Functionality of a programming language in educational processes. Sustainability, 12(23), 10129.

Hudson, B. (2011). Didactical design for technology enhanced learning. Beyond Fragmentation: Didactics, Learning and Teaching in Europe, 223–238.

Jannah, R. R., Apriliya, S., & Karlimah. (2017). Didactical design material units of distance and speed to developed mathematical connection in elementary school. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 180(1), 012022.

Kotsyuba, I. Y., Sokolov, S. A., Shikov, A. N., & Valdaitceva, M. V. (2022). The system of support for the didactic design of academic disciplines of the humanities and socio-economic cycle. Applied Mathematics and Control Sciences, 2, 109–123.

Marfuah, M., Suryadi, D., Turmudi, T., & Isnawan, M. G. (2022). Providing online learning situations for in-service mathematics teachers’ external transposition knowledge during COVID-19 pandemic: Case of Indonesia. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(1), pp69-84.

Maulana, M., Rahman, A. A., & Aminah, M. (2022). MURRDERR strategy: Developing creative characters of elementary school prospective teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 547–564.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Douglas. (2009). Preferred eeporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889–896.

Nur’aeni, E., Muharram, M. R. W., & Sriwianti, S. (2019). Didactical design of mathematics teaching based on gobak sodor traditional games in primary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1), 012015.

Nyman, R., & Kilhamn, C. (2015). Enhancing engagement in algebra: Didactical strategies implemented and discussed by teachers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(6), 623–637.

Olsson, J., & Granberg, C. (2022). Teacher-student interaction supporting students’ creative mathematical reasoning during problem solving using Scratch. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1–28.

Pauji, I., Hadi, H., & Juandi, D. (2023). Systematic literature review: Analysis of learning obstacle in didactical design research on geometry material. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2895–2906.

Prabowo, A., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., Juandi, D., & Junaedi, I. (2022). Learning obstacles in the making of lesson plans by prospective mathematics teacher students. Education Research International, 2022, 1–15.

Prediger, S. (2019). Theorizing in design research. Avances de Investigación En Educación Matemática, 15, 5–27.

Rohaeti, E. E., Nurjaman, A., Sari, I. P., Bernard, M., & Hidayat, W. (2019). Developing didactic design in triangle and rectangular toward students mathematical creative thinking through Visual Basic for PowerPoint. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 042068.

Rosas, G. A. P., Polo, M. J. A., Hermosilla, A. S., Delgado, A., & Huamaní, E. L. (2023). Development of a web system to improve and reinforce learning in mathematics in primary and secondary students in Peru. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(5s), 51–58.

Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design tools in didactical research: instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329–342.

Salinas, P., González-Mendívil, E., Quintero, E., Ríos, H., Ramírez, H., & Morales, S. (2013). The development of a didactic prototype for the learning of mathematics through augmented reality. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 62–70.

Schreiberova, P., & Moravkova, Z. (2023). The use of geogebra in technical mathematics. MM Science Journal, 2023(1).

Solares, D., & Block, D. (2021). Mujeres que leen, escriben y calculan para participar en la economía familiar y local. Avances de Investigación En Educación Matemática, 19, 55–70.

Supriadi. (2022). Elementary school students reflection: Didactical design analysis on integer and fraction operations on mathematical concepts with Sundanese ethnomathematics learning. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(4), 192-199.

Supriadi, S. (2019). Didactic design of Sundanese ethnomathematics learning for primary school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 154–175.

Supriyadi, E., Suryadi, D., Turmudi, T., Prabawanto, S., Juandi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2023). Didactical design research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 18, 153–160.

Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical design research (DDR) dalam pengembangan pembelajaran. In Prosiding seminar nasional matematika dan pendidikan matematika (Vol. 1, Issue 1).

Teichmann, M., Vladova, G., & Gronau, N. (2023). Conception of subject-oriented learning - A meso-didactic design framework for learning scenarios for manufacturing. SSRN Electronic Journal, May.

Wahyuningrum, A. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2017). Epistemological obstacles on the topic of ratio and proportion among junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012066.

Wahyuningrum, A. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi, T. (2019). Learning obstacles among indonesian eighth graders on ratio and proportion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), 012046.

Wang, W., Dong, X., Qu, J., Lin, Y., & Liu, L. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of microtia-related publications from 2006 to 2020. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, 19(1), 1–5.

Zyoud, S. H., Al-Jabi, S. W., & Sweileh, W. M. (2015). Worldwide research productivity of paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: A bibliometric analysis (2003-2012). Human and Experimental Toxicology, 34(1), 12–23.




How to Cite

Dasari, D., Muhammad, I., & Juandi, D. (2024). Crafting math minds: A bibliometric odyssey into innovative didactical designs for learning (2006-2023). Jurnal Elemen, 10(1), 181–198.




Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.