Students’ critical thinking across self-efficacy levels in STEM website-supported challenge-based differentiated learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v12i1.32330Keywords:
critical thinking skills, challenge-based learning, differentiated learning, self-efficacy, STEM websiteAbstract
This study aims to examine the effectiveness of implementing Challenge-Based Differentiated Learning supported by a STEM website, analyze the influence of self-efficacy on critical thinking, and describe students’ critical thinking skills in relation to self-efficacy. The research employed a mixed-methods approach, a sequential explanatory design, and simple random sampling. Class VIII B served as the experimental group implementing the CB-DL model, and VIII A as the control group implementing problem-based learning, with each group consisting of 33 students. The results showed that the CB-DL model was effective in improving critical thinking skills, as indicated by an increase in the average pretest score from 65.15 to 83.33 on the posttest and a Cohen's D of 0.57. In addition, self-efficacy has a significant effect on critical thinking skills with a value R2 of 0.3542. Subjects with high self-efficacy met all six indicators of critical thinking skills, including interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation. Those with moderate self-efficacy did not meet the self-regulation indicator, and those with low self-efficacy did not meet the explanation and self-regulation indicators. These findings confirm that the CB-DL supported by a STEM website, along with self-efficacy reinforcement, can optimize students’ critical thinking skills.
References
Algani, Y. M. A. (2022). Role , need and benefits of mathematics in the development of society. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices, 3(1), 23–29.
Ardiansyah, A. S., Junaedi, I., Khoirunnisa, D. D., & Maharani, S. (2024). Challenge based on differentiated learning : upaya mengembangkan literasi numerasi dan memfasilitasi kebutuhan belajar peserta didik [Challenge-based differentiated learning: developing numeracy literacy and addressing students’ learning needs]. Prosiding Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 107–116.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercises of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., Lecturer, P., Morrison, K., & Lecturer, S. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What it is and why it counts. Measured Reasons LLC. www.insightassessment.com
Fredy, L.-D., Oscar, B., & Ana, V. (2025). Pedagogical mediation with ICT for the development of critical thinking in primary education : A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 60, Article 102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102085
Georgara, A., Santolini, M., Kokshagina, O., Justine, C., Haux, J., Jacobs, D., Biwott, G., Correa, M., Sierra, C., Fernandez-marquez, J. L., & Rodriguez-aguilar, J. A. (2025). The role of AI in enhancing challenge-based learning participation experience and outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100388
Guo, Y., Huang, L., Zhang, C., Li, Q., & Chen, M. (2025). ChatGPT in education: A systematic review of its impact on critical thinking skills and dispositions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, Article 102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102106
Hamami, Y. (2025). Philosophy of mathematical practice and mathematics education : Cross-fertilization , dialogue and prospects. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 78, Article 101208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101208
Hanifah, N., & Agustini, R. (2012). Peningkatan self efficacy dan berpikir kritis melalui penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri materi pokok asam basa kelas XI SMAN 9 Surabaya [Improving self-efficacy and critical thinking through the application of the inquiry learning model in the core subject of acids and bases for grade XI at SMAN 9 Surabaya]. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/146125840
Hidayah, N., Kusmaryono, I., & Abdul Basir, M. (2024). Proses pembelajaran berdiferensiasi terhadap peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis pada materi operasi hitung aljabar [Differentiated learning process for improving critical thinking skills in algebraic calculation operations]. Cartesian: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.33752/cartesian.v4i1.6326
Hidayat, R. A., & Noer, S. H. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis yang ditinjau dari self efficacy siswa dalam pembelajaran daring [Analysis of mathematical critical thinking skills reviewed from student self-efficacy in online learning]. Media Pendidikan Matematika Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FSTT UNDIKMA, 9(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v9i2.4224
Jager, L., Denessen, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Meijer, P. C. (2025). Instructional differentiation in secondary education : Teachers ’ actions and reasoning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 159, Article 105009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105009
Leibovitch, Y. M., Beencke, A., Ellerton, P. J., Mcbrien, C., Robinson-taylor, C., & Brown, D. J. (2025). Teachers ’ (evolving) beliefs about critical thinking education during professional learning : A multi- case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, Article 101725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101725
Lisnawati, L., & Nirmala, S. D. (2024). The effectiveness of differentiated learning strategies on elementary students’ mathematical critical thinking ability. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5746
Mildawani, M. M. T. S., Murti, T. R., Maryatmi, A. S., & Abraham, J. (2022). A psychological model of competitive behavior : social comparison as a mediator of the critical thinking , self-efficacy, and adaptation ability prediction among college students. Heliyon, 8(12), e12205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12205
Nawawi, S. (2017). Developing of module challenge based learning in environmental material to empower the critical thinking ability. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 212–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.15988.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results: Factsheets Indonesia (pp.1-10). OECD Publishing.
Paraniti, A. A. I., Redhana, I. W., Suardana, I. N., & Suma, K. (2024). Integration of challenge-based and differentiated learning: A Preliminary Study. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), 1299–1308. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.5245
Pertiwi, N. P., Saputro, S., Yamtinah, S., & Kamari, A. (2024). Enhancing critical thinking skills through stem problem-based contextual learning: An integrated e-module education website with virtual experiments. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(4), 739–766. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.739
Prajono, R., Gunarti, D. Y., & Anggo, M. (2022). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis peserta didik smp ditinjau dari self efficacy [Analysis of junior high school students' mathematical critical thinking skills in terms of self-efficacy].Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i1.694
Retta, A. M., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Susanti, E. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking with realistic mathematics education: Insight from learning styles, thinking habits, and cognitive abilities. Jurnal Elemen, 11(3), 669-686. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v11i3.30013
Riyanto, Waluya, & Mariani. (2019). Mathematics critical thinking reviewed from self-efficacy and motivation of learning in arias learning article info. Journal of Primary Education, 9(2), 243–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v9i2.32690
Sardi, A., Palimari, P., & Rahmayani, S. (2022). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik melalui challenge based learning [Improving students' critical thinking skills through challenge-based learning]. Al-Irsyad Journal of Physics Education, 1(2), 68-83. https://doi.org/10.58917/ijpe.v1i2.31
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, Article 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423
Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity , autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
Wang, X., Huang, X., & Zhou, W. (2024). The effect of university students ’ self-efficacy on problem-solving disposition : The chained dual mediating role of metacognition disposition and critical thinking disposition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, Article 101658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101658
Widodo, Y. B., Amri, M., Yustitia, V., Dwyarthi, N. D. M. S., Oktavuo, A., & Dirsa, A. (2024). The Effectiveness of the STEM-based Differentiation learning model on merdeka curriculum learning outcomes. Indonesia Journal of Engineering and Education Technology (IJEET), 2(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.61991/ijeet.v2i1.33
Widya, L. N., Sa’dijah, C., & Chandra, T. D. (2023). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa smp dalam menyelesaikan asesmen kompetensi minimum numerasi ditinjau dari efikasi diri. [Middle school students' critical thinking skills in completing minimum numeracy competency assessments reviewed from self-efficacy]. Jurnal Paedagogy, 10(4), 1189. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v10i4.9170
Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading , critical thinking : Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.002
Wingard, A., Kijima, R., Yang-yoshihara, M., & Sun, K. (2022). A design thinking approach to developing girls ’ creative self-efficacy in STEM. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, Article 101140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101140
Yoosomboon, S., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Development of a challenge based learning model via cloud technology and social media for enhancing information management skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2102–2107.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fadhila Salvia Khairunnisa, Adi Satrio Ardiansyah, Rini Wulandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
