Investigating the fragmentation of students’ creative thinking structures in realistic mathematics education: A qualitative case study of junior high school students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v12i1.32899Keywords:
creative thinking, fragmentation, realistic mathematics education, thinking structureAbstract
The fragmentation of creative thinking structures is a phenomenon requiring serious attention in Realistic Mathematics Education (RME). However, studies that systematically explore how students’ creative thinking fragmentation manifests across RME learning stages remain limited. This study aims to examine the types and forms of students' creative thinking fragmentation across four RME activities: situation, model of situation, model for knowledge, and formal mathematics. This research employs a qualitative case study design. Participants consisted of 18 seventh-grade students from an Integrated Islamic Junior High School in Sukoharjo Regency. Data were collected through non-routine mathematical problem tests and in-depth interviews, with validity ensured through source triangulation. Data analysis involved thematic coding based on a fragmentation typology aligned with RME stages, followed by data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. The results identified five types of fragmentation: (1) less-strict fragmentation at the situation stage, (2) translational fragmentation (text to symbol) at the situation stage, (3) pseudo-false fragmentation at the model of situation stage, (4) translational fragmentation (text to image) at the model for knowledge stage, and (5) pseudo-true fragmentation at the formal mathematics stage. These findings extend theoretical perspectives and inform instructional design and scaffolding strategies in RME classrooms.
References
Abdu, R., Tancredi, S., Abrahamson, D., & Balasubramaniam, R. (2025). Demonstrating mathematics learning as the emergence of eye–hand dynamic equilibrium. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 118(3), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10279-0
Avcı, Ü., & Durak, H. Y. (2023). Innovative thinking skills and creative thinking dispositions in learning environments: Antecedents and consequences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47(1), 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101225
Bicer, A., Lee, Y., Perihan, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). Considering mathematical creative self-efficacy with problem posing as a measure of mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09995-8
Djannah, M., Setyaningsih, N., Kholid, M. N., & Reotutar, M. A. C. (2024). Defragmentation of students ’ conceptual understanding in solving non-routine mathematics problems. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 11(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v11i2.38383
Fredriksen, H. (2021). Exploring realistic mathematics education in a flipped classroom context at the tertiary level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10053-1
Grajzel, K., Acar, S., Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., & Berthiaume, K. (2023). Measuring flexibility: A text-mining approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1093343
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. CD Press.
Hasibuan, S., Chu, C. T., & Godh, W. A. (2024). Enhancing creative thinking in circle topics through the realistic mathematics learning approach. Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 2(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v2i2.1148
Herna. (2016). Defragmentasi struktur berpikir mahasiswa untuk memperbaiki konstruktsi pseudo benar mahasiswa dalam memahami konsep limit fungsi [Defragmenting students’ thinking structures to improve students’ pseudo-true constructions in understanding the concept of F]. Unievrsitas Negeri Malang.
Kholid, M. N., Mahmudah, M. H., Ishartono, N., Putra, F. G., & Forthmann, B. (2024). Classification of students’ creative thinking for non-routine mathematical problems. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2394738
Kholid, M. N., Santosa, Y. T., Toh, T. L., Wijaya, A. P., Sujadi, I., & Hendriana, H. (2024). Defragmenting students’ reflective thinking levels for mathematical problem solving: Does it work? Reflective Practice, 25(3), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2320140
Krulik, S., Milou, E., & Rudnick, J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in middle school: A practical guide. Pearson.
Listyaningrum, P., Retnawati, H., Harun, H., & Ibda, H. (2025). Realistic mathematics education in digital era elementary schools: A systematic literature review. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 15(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.15.1.20123
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
Nguyen, Q. A., Dao, N. H., Hoa, T. A., & Nguyen, N.-G. (2025). Teaching conditional probability in grade 12 using realistic mathematics education theory. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 603–632. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i2.pp603-632
Nugroho, A. A., Nizaruddin, N., Dwijayanti, I., & Tristianti, A. (2020). Exploring students’ creative thinking in the use of representations in solving mathematical problems based on cognitive style. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(2), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.9983
Preiss, D. D. (2022). Metacognition, mind wandering, and cognitive flexibility: Understanding creativity. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030069
Putra, R. W. Y., Sutiarso, S., & Nurhanurawati, N. (2024). Using the realistic mathematics education (rme) approach with scaffolding to enhance mathematical representation ability. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v15i2.24560
Samaniego, M., Usca, N., Salguero, J., & Quevedo, W. (2024). Creative thinking in art and design education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(2), 192–224. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020192
Schulz, A. (2024). Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7
Setyaningsih, N., Rejeki, S., & Ishartono, N. (2019). Developing realistic and child-friendly learning model for teaching mathematics. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 4(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i2.8112
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages: Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007
Solomon, Y., Hough, S., & Gough, S. (2021). The role of appropriation in guided reinvention: establishing and preserving devolved authority with low-attaining students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09998-5
Subanji. (2015). Teori kesalahan konstruksi konsep dan pemecahan masalah matematika [Theory of concept construction errors and mathematical problem solving]. UM Press.
Sutarni, S., Sutama, S., Prayitno, H. J., Sutopo, A., & Laksmiwati, P. A. (2024). The development of realistic mathematics education-based student worksheets to enhance higher-order thinking skills and mathematical ability. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p285-300
Tolkamp, G., Verwaeren, B., Vriend, T., Riekhoff, A.-J., & Nijstad, B. (2025). Creativity as it unfolds: An examination of temporality in the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 37(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2234719
Ulker, D., & Celik, A. O. (2025). A qualitative metasynthesis: Interaction between mathematical modeling and higher order thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101773
Usodo, B., Aulia, I. I., Wulandari, A. N., Sutopo, Setiawan, R., Kurniawati, I., & Kuswardi, Y. (2020). Fragmentation of thinking structure and its impact to students’ algebraic concept construction and problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032006
Wibawa, K. A. (2019). Fragmentation of the thinking structure of translation in solving mathematical modelling problems. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 9(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v9i1.71
Wibawa, K. A., Nusantara, T., Subanji, & Nengah Parta, I. (2018). Defragmentation of student’s thinking structures in solving mathematical problems based on CRA framework. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012150
Wibawa, K. A., Nusantara, T., Subanji, & Parta, N. (2021). Rekonstruksi kesalahan dan perbaikan struktur berpikir dalam memecahkan masalah matematis [Error reconstruction and improvement of thinking structures in solving mathematical problems]. CV Confident.
Wibawa, K. A., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., & Parta, I. N. (2017). Fragmentation of thinking structure’s students to solving the problem of application definite integral in area. International Education Studies, 10(5), 48. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n5p48
Widyaningrum, M. S., Usodo, B., & Pratiwi, H. (2021). Fragmentation of students’ thinking structure in constructing the concept of linear inequality of two variables. Proceedings of the International Conference of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (I-CMME 2021), 597, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211122.026
Wulandari, A. N., Usodo, B., Sutopo, Setiawan, R., Kurniawati, I., Kuswardi, Y., & Aulia, I. I. (2020). Fragmentation of thinking structure: concept construction and problem solving in geometry of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032007
Zanten, M. Van, & Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. Van den. (2021). Mathematics curriculum reform and its implementation in textbooks: Early addition and subtraction in realistic mathematics education. Mathematics, 9(7), 752–772. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070752
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yoga Tegar Santosa, Nining Setyaningsih, Berliani Ardelia Sukowati, Dini Wardani Maulida, Mutiara Hisda Mahmudah, Ade Ayu Meganingrum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
