A meta-analysis study of the effect of the blended learning model on students’ mathematics learning achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i1.6141Keywords:
blended learning, mathematics achievement, meta-analysisAbstract
Many studies have researched the effect of blended learning on mathematics learning achievement, but the results of previous research reported different results. Therefore, this research aims to determine the effect of the blended learning model on mathematics learning achievement. The design of this study used a meta-analysis approach by analyzing 20 effect sizes from 18 primary studies that were Scopus-indexed and met the inclusion criteria. The results of the analysis show that the use of the blended learning model affects mathematics achievement compared to traditional learning (d = 0.725; p < 0.05). The results of the analysis according to the moderator variable are known that the effect of the blended learning model on mathematics achievement is different based on the level of education (Qb = 13.923; p < 0.05) and the year of research (Qb = 16.140; p < 0.05). However, no differences were found according to the sample size group (Qb = 0.039; p > 0.05) and media platform (Qb = 2.861; p > 0.05. The findings show the consistency of the publication of research results on the effect of using the blended learning model on students' mathematics learning achievement.References
Adelabu, F. M., Makgato, M., & Ramaligela, M. S. (2019). The importance of dynamic geometry computer software on learners ’ performance in geometry. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 17(1), 52–63.
Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436052000318541
Akgundus, D., & Akinoglu, O. (2016). The effect of blended learning and social media-supported learning on the students’ attitude and self-directed learning skills in science education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 106–115.
Alammary, A., Carbone, A., & Sheard, J. (2015, 2015). Identifying criteria that should be considered when deciding the proportion of online to face-to-face components of a blended course 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (IEEE, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.19
Baytak, A., Tarman, B., & Ayas, C. (2011). Experiencing technology integration in education children's perceptions. International Electronik Journal of Elementary Education, 3(2), 139–151.
Belanger, M. P. (2018). Effects of blended learning and gender on mathematics assessment in elementary fourth and fifth grade students [Doctoral dissertations. Grand Canyon University.
Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C. N., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 124–132.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
Bulut, O., & Delen, E. (2011). The relationship between students’ exposure to technology and their achievement in science and math. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 311–317.
Chen, C. H., Shih, C. C., & Law, V. (2020). The effects of competition in digital game-based learning (DGBL): A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1855–1873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09794-1
Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators online, 12(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2015.1.5
Cobena, D. Y., & Surjono, H. D. (2022). Implementation of flipped classroom model in vocational high school: A Systematic Literature Review. JTP -Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i1.25185
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International journal of educational technology in Higher education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
Gonzalez, G. M., & Birchm, M. A. (2000). Evaluating the instructional efficacy of computer-mediated interactive multimedia: comparing three elementary statistics tutorial modules. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.2190/X8PQ-K0GQ-T2DR-XY1A
Herron, J. (2010). Implementation of technology in an elementary mathematics lesson: The experiences of pre-service teachers at one university. SRATE Journal, 19(1), 22–29.
Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. S. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021
Hung, C. H. (2007). The effectiveness of an interactive website in teaching a common factors and multiples course at the elementary level [Masters Thesis, Yunlin University of Science and Technology].
Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., Tamur, M., Perbowo, K. S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). A meta-analysis of Geogebra software decade of assisted mathematics learning: what to learn and where to go? Heliyon, 7(5), 06953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06953
Juandi, D., & Priatna, N. (2018). Discovery learning model with geogebra assisted for improvement mathematical visual thinking ability. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1013(1), 012209. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012209
Karagöl, İ., & Emrullah, E. S. E. N. (2019). The effect of flipped learning approach on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(3), 708–727. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018046755
Keser, H., Uzunboylu, H., & Ozdamli, F. (2012). The trends in technology supported collaborative learning studies in 21stcentury. World Journal on Educational Technology, 3(2), 103–119.
Khoirunnisa, M., & Adistana, G. A. Y. P. A. (2021). Meta analisis model blended learning menggunakan LMS dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar pendidikan kejuruan [Meta-analysis of blended learning models using LMS in improving vocational education learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 1639–1648.
Kurt, S. (2010). Technology use in elementary education in Turkey: A case study. New Horizons in Education, 58(1), 65–76.
Lalima, L., & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
Lin, Y. W. (2017). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a
Lusa, H., Adnan, A., & Yurniwati, Y. (2021). Effect of blended learning on students' learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 11(2), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202113
Marco, F. A., Penichet, V. M. R., & Lázaro, J. A. G. (2013, 2013). Drawer: An innovative teaching method for blended learning Taylor’s 7thteaching and learning conference proceedings,
Muhtadi, A., Assagaf, G., & Hukom, J. (2022). Self-efficacy and students’ mathematics learning ability in Indonesia: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 1131–1146. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15360a
Nurjanah, L., B, Y., R, & Tamur, M. (2020). Computer-assisted learning using the Cabri 3D for improving spatial ability and self- regulated learning. Heliyon, 6(11), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05536
Ojaleye, O., & Awofala, A. O. A. (2018). Blended learning and problem-based learning instructional strategies as determinants of senior secondary school students’ achievement in Algebra. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(2), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.428286
Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The internet and higher education, 18, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003
Paloloang, M. F. B., Juandi, D., Tamur, M., Paloloang, B., & Adem, A. M. (2020). Meta analisis: pengaruh problem-based learning terhadap kemampuan literasi matematis siswa di Indonesia tujuh tahun terakhir [Meta analysis: the effect of problem-based learning on students' mathematical literacy skills in Indonesia in the last seven years. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 851–886. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3049
Prasetya, B., Muchtar, H., & Syahrial, Z. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran dan minat belajar terhadap hasil belajar statistik [The effect of learning models and interest in learning on statistical learning outcomes. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan (JTP, 20(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.24114/jtp.v11i2.12591
Purnomo, B., Muhtadi, A., Ramadhani, R., Manaf, A., & Hukom, J. (2022). The effect of flipped classroom model on mathematical ability: A meta analysis study. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 12(3), 1201–1217. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i3.202216
Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, A., & Syazali, M. (2019). The effect of flipped-problem based learning model integrated with LMS-Google Classroom for senior high school students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.548350
Retnawati, H., Apino, E., Djidu, H., & Kartianom. (2018). Pengantar analisis meta. Paroma Publishing.
Sanuaka, A. A., Ariawan, K. U., & Sutaya, W. (2017). Pengembangan media pembelajaran electronic book (e-book) interaktif multimedia dalam mata pelajaran teknik animasi 3D dan teknik animasi 2D di jurusan multimedia SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja [Development of interactive multimedia electronic book (e-book) learning media in the subjects of 3D animation techniques and 2D animation techniques in the multimedia department of SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro Undiksha, 6(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpte.v6i2.20234
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis corrected error and bias in research findings. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 20(7), 242–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2289738
Setiawan, A. A., Muhtadi, A., & Hukom, J. (2022). Blended learning and student mathematics ability in Indonesia: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15249a
Setyaningrum, W. (2018). Blended learning: Does it help students in understanding mathematical concepts? Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i2.21428
Staker, B. H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K – 12 blended learning. Innosight Institute, Inc.
Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Tamur, M., Jehadus, E., Nendi, F., Mandur, K., & Murni, V. (2020). Assessing the effectiveness of the contextual teaching and learning model on students’ mathematical understanding ability: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1), 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012067
Tamur, M., & Juandi, D. (2020). Effectiveness of constructivism based learning models against students mathematical creative thinking abilities in Indonesia: A meta-analysis study. In Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296507
Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002
Wang, Y. Z., & Yu, C. Z. (2012, 2012). A study of influence on learning motivation and effectiveness with the Moodle learning platform in mathematics area's remedial instruction-example of grade 3 Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Digital Content and Virtual Learning Conference,
Wiginton, B. L. (2013). Flipped instruction: An investigation into the effect of learning environment on student self-efficacy, learning style, and academic achievement in an algebra I classroom [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alabama]. Tuscaloosa.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
