Can the Buzz Group Strategy Unlock Potential? Exploring Its Impact on Enhancing Students’ Writing Skills Through a Quasi-Experimental Study

Authors

  • Prastyawan Prastyawan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Jamilah Jamilah Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.24502

Keywords:

Writing, Buzz Group strategy, experimental, vocational school

Abstract

Writing is a complex skill that poses significant challenges for students in their native or foreign languages. To address these challenges, educators must adopt effective teaching strategies. This study investigates the effectiveness of the Buzz Group strategy, a promising approach to enhancing students' writing skills. Conducted at a vocational school in Tuban, this quasi-experimental research compared the writing abilities of two groups of tenth-grade students: an experimental group taught using the Buzz Group strategy and a control group receiving traditional lecture-based instruction. The study involved 61 students randomly assigned to the experimental group (X TKJ A) or the control group (X TKJ B). Pre- and post-test scores were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, revealing significant improvements in the writing abilities of the Buzz Group participants. While both groups had similar baseline scores, the post-test results showed a marked improvement in the experimental group (mean score = 88.50) compared to the control group (mean score = 65.81). The p-value of 0.000 led to rejecting the null hypothesis, confirming the Buzz Group strategy's efficacy in improving writing skills. In summary, this study provides empirical evidence that the Buzz Group technique significantly enhances the writing capabilities of vocational school students. This finding supports the strategy's potential as an effective tool for writing education.

References

Afriani, N. S. (2018). Improving reading comprehension of the grade vii students by using Buzz Group technique. ELTS (English Language Teaching Society), 6(1).

Arslan, A. (2020). Instructional design considerations for flipped classroom. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(6), 33-59.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. K. (2009). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.

Atkins, M., & Brown, G. (2002). Effective teaching in higher education. Routledge.

Barkley, E. F., Major, C. H., & Cross, K. P. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.

Brewer, E. W. (2003). Proven ways to get your message across. Corwin Press, Inc.

Craig, P., Katikireddi, S. V., Leyland, A., & Popham, F. (2017). Natural experiments: an overview of methods, approaches, and contributions to public health intervention research. Annual review of public health, 38, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044327

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th Ed. Pearson Education.

Enbaeva, L. V., & Plastinina, N. (2021). Distance learning challenges in translation teaching: Mediation competence development. E3S Web of Conferences, 258, 07078. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125807078

Enking, P., Harmer-Beem, M., Pardue, K., & Turcato, N. (2004). A model for an integrated interdisciplinary approach to clinical faculty development. The Journal of Faculty Development, 19(3), 123-130.

Felix, U. (2005). Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research—towards a common agenda. Computer assisted language learning, 18(1-2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500132274

Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Pearson Education Limited.

Hidayanto, A. K. (2022). The influence of Buzz group technique toward students’ speaking skill at the 8th grade students of MTsN 1 Kota Serang. PROCEEDING AISELT, 6(1). https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/aiselt/article/view/17156

Jacobs, H. L. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. English composition program. Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Larasanti, S., & Marlina, L. (2019). Using Buzz group technique in writing activity for EFL students at senior high school. Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 13-21. https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt/article/view/103322

Madison, M. J., Frischmann, B. M., & Strandburg, K. J. (2009). Constructing commons in the cultural environment. Cornell L. Rev., 95, 657.

Muntaha, M. (2016). Buzz group and self-esteem on teaching listening in an Indonesian EFL classroom. Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 14(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v14i2.583

Nisa, A. T. (2022). Improving students' reading comprehension of recount text through question answer relationship strategy (a classroom action research in eighth grade smpit ar-risalah) (Bachelor's thesis, Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta). https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/60918

Nuardi, N., & Anuar, I. H. (2017). The effect of using Buzz Group technique on students ability in writing analytical exposition paragraph. Indonesian Journal of Integrated English Language Teaching, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.24014/ijielt.v2i2.2463

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw hall.

Nurhayati, D. a. W. (2016). Using local drama in writing and Speaking: EFL Learners’ Creative Expresssion. JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics), 1(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v1i1.13

Nuryanto, A., & Eryandi, K. Y. (2020). The 21st century ideal skills for vocational high schools. Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Research and Innovation (ICERI 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200204.026

Pangaribuan, T., & Manik, S. (2017). The effect of Buzz group technique and clustering technique in teaching writing at the first class of SMA HKBP I Tarutung. English Language Teaching (Toronto), 11(1), 164. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n1p164

Putri, R. O. (2018). Investigating the link between critical thinking skill and argumentative writing skill: The case of Islamic senior high school. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 5(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.19109/ejpp.v5i2.2090

Romeike, B., & Fischer, M. (2019). Buzz groups facilitate collaborative learning and improve histopathological competencies of students. Clinical Neuropathology, 38(11), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.5414/np301195

Rufaidah, D., Andayani, A., & Wardani, N. E. (2022). Problem-based learning in learning writing skills in vocational high school (SMK). Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Humanities and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.8-12-2021.2322560

Sari, I.P. (2020). The effect of Buzz Group technique on students’ speaking ability: Quasi experimental research at eleventh grade students of SMAN 4 South of Bengkulu [Dissertation]. IAIN Bengkulu.

Sinambela, E., Sagala, P., & Pasaribu, A. N. (2023). The effect of using buzz group and talking chips technique on students’ speaking ability at senior high school. Ideas: Journal on English Language and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(2), 1744–1755. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i2.3055

Wahyuni, S. (2021). Using Buzz Group technique in teaching reading comprehension to the tenth grade students of SMA Muhammadiyah Pagaralam. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 4(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v4i1.5137

Westwood, P. S., & Westwood, P. (2008). What teachers need to know about reading and writing difficulties. Aust Council for Ed Research.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-29

How to Cite

Prastyawan, P., & Jamilah, J. (2024). Can the Buzz Group Strategy Unlock Potential? Exploring Its Impact on Enhancing Students’ Writing Skills Through a Quasi-Experimental Study. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.24502

Issue

Section

Articles