Investigating Communicative Language Teaching Barriers for English Students in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i2.21303Keywords:
classroom strategies, CLT, obstaclesAbstract
Teaching English as a foreign language presents unique challenges. This research delves into the hurdles faced by English Language Department students at Al-Mergib University, particularly in active participation during the learning process. The study also explores the pedagogical strategies employed by Al-Mergib University instructors, with a focus on communicative language teaching (CLT). Through an applied research approach, the root causes of these challenges and potential solutions are investigated. Data were gathered from five teachers and ten students to offer deeper insights. Findings indicate a mixed teaching approach in Libyan classrooms, while many educators utilize interactive methods such as collaborative learning, others remain reliant on traditional techniques. The results highlight the necessity for teachers to adapt their strategies in response to evolving student needs. A significant challenge for students was understanding lectures, often due to rapid speech and limited vocabulary exposure, hampering language and vocabulary development. The study underscores the importance of targeted teaching practices, fostering student collaboration, and creating a dynamic learning environment. Enhancing students' confidence in English is further facilitated by encouraging its use outside the classroom setting. This research holds valuable implications for language education, curriculum development, teacher training, and the advancement of efficacious English communication skills.
References
Ahmed, S. (2015). Attitudes towards English language learning among EFL learners at UMSKAL. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 6-18. http://www.iiste.org.
Akbari, Z. (2016). The study of EFL students' perceptions of their problems, needs and concerns over learning English: The case of MA paramedical students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.006.
Al-Farraj, O., & Al-Shuaibi, A. (2018). Libyan EFL teachers' attitudes towards communicative language teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 290-300. doi: 10.17507/jltr.0902.11
Al-Khamisi, K. and Sinha, Y. (2022) Communicative Language Teaching methodologies in Omani EFL context. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 12, 481-503. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2022.124035.
Alkhawaldeh, A. (December 2010). The challenges faced by Jordanian English language teachers at Amman 1st and 2nd directorates of education college student. Journal, 44(4).
Al-Mahdawi, A. R., & Alzoubi, A. M. (2019). The impact of communicative language teaching on enhancing Libyan EFL learners' speaking ability in university context. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), 105-118
Al-Mekhlafi, A. M., & Nagaratnam, R. P. (2011). The effectiveness of using blended learning in the teaching of writing: A case study in Vemen. International Education Studies, 4(1), 99-109.
Bax, S. (2003). The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal, 57(3), 278-287.
Belhiah, H., & Elkhafaifi, H. (2015). Challenges Arab students face in learning English and strategies that work. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 1-14.
Boufarrag, Adel F.E. (2021). Transforming the teaching of reading in Libyan secondary school English classes: Implementing the communicative approach. [Doctoral dissertation] University of Glasgow. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/82298.
Brog, M. B. (2006). Context in language learning and language understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 459-480.
Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B.F. Skinner's verbal behavior. Language, 35(1), 26-58.
Demir, Y. (2019). An investigation of the factors affecting the speaking ability of Turkish EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 150-167.
Holliday, A. (1994). The house of TESEP and the communicative approach: The special needs of state English language education. ELT Journal, 48(1) 3-11. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/eltj/articleabstract/48/1/3/2730556
Hussein, S. (2018). Factors affecting the implementation of communicative language teaching in Libyan secondary schools. [Doctoral dissertation], Sheffield Hallam University. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/23409/
Hymes, D. (1972). On Communicative competence. Sociolinguistics, 269-293.
Ibrahim, Z. A. (2018). The implementation of communicative language teaching in teaching reading comprehension in Libyan preparatory schools. [Doctoral dissertation], University Sains Islam Malaysia. http://ddms.usim.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/18176.
Karavas-Doukas. (1996). Using attitude scales to investigate teachers' attitudes to the communicative approach. ELT Journal, 50, 187-197.
Khan, T. J., & Khan, N. (2016). Obstacles in learning English as a second language among intermediate students of districts Mianwali and Bhakkar, Pakistan. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4(02), 154. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.42021
Kim, S., & Elder, C. (2019). International graduate students' challenges and strategies for expressing themselves in academic settings. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 73-84.
Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
Kramsch, C., & Sullivan, P. (1996). Appropriate pedagogy. ELT Hournal, 50(3), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.199
Krashen, S. D. (1980). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.
Levine, D. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1982). Beyond language: Intercultural communication for English as a second language. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition, 2. Second language acquisition, 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Mokhtar, N. A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2017). Investigating factors affecting low proficiency in speaking among Malaysian tertiary students. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 66-77
Nestsiarovich, K., Pons, D., & Becker, S. (2020). Communication Adjustment in Engineering Professional and Student Project Meetings. Behavioral Sciences, 10(7), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10070111
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51(1), 157-213.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks. Cal.: Sage Publications.
Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL quarterly, 23(4), 589-618.https://doi.org/10.2307/3587534
Riazi, A. M., & Rahimi, M. (2015). Vocabulary knowledge and speaking ability among Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(3), 27-38
Savin-Baden, M., & Howell-Major, C. (2013). Qualitative research: the essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge. https://www.amazon.com/Qualitative-Research-essential-theory-practice/dp/0415674786
Wang, X., & Li, X. (2021). English learners' perceptions of teacher talk: issues and implications. RELC Journal, 52(1), 86-99. doi: 10.1177/0033688220979718.
Wang, X., Lin, W., & Li, J. (2018). An empirical study of English as the medium of instruction in China's higher education. Higher Education, 75(2), 281-298.
Zhang, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Making errors work: error management training in language classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 227-246.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
