An Appraisal Analysis of Attitude in Joko Widodo's ASEAN Summit Speeches

Authors

  • Armita Ayu Sekarsari Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Yeny Prastiwi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Anam Sutopo Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.24738

Keywords:

Appraisal framework, attitude, opening speech

Abstract

This study employs Martin and White's (2005) Appraisal Framework to analyze the attitude subsystem within President Joko Widodo's speeches at the 2023 ASEAN Summit in Jakarta. The research focuses on uncovering the speaker's expressed attitudes by closely examining his language choices. Data was drawn from English translation scripts of speeches delivered on September 5-7, 2023, and selected using purposive sampling. Analysis of the 43rd ASEAN Summit reveals a significant emphasis on Affect, particularly Inclination, and expressions of Happiness and Satisfaction. Judgments of Veracity, Normality, and Capacity, though less frequent, were also present. The Appreciation category showcased a greater frequency of Reaction and Valuation, indicating the speaker's responsiveness to current challenges and articulation of long-term goals. Interestingly, the 26th ASEAN-Japan Summit speech exhibited a shift in emphasis. While the effect was still prominent, Judgment (precisely Capacity) and Appreciation became more pronounced. This suggests a heightened focus on highlighting expertise and shared values within the ASEAN-Japan context. Overall, this study offers insights into President Widodo's strategic use of language to convey attitudes, build consensus, and address regional issues. These findings have potential educational applications, demonstrating how language can reflect a speaker's beliefs and intentions.

Author Biographies

Armita Ayu Sekarsari, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

English Department

Yeny Prastiwi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

English Department

Anam Sutopo, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

English Department

References

Adams, C. (2002). Practitioner review: The assessment of language pragmatics. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 43(8), 973-987. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00226

Bakhtin, M. (2014). The problem of speech genres. In Modern genre theory (pp. 82-97). Routledge.

Bamberg, M. (2005). Narrative discourse and identities. Narratology beyond literary criticism, 213-237.

Birner, B. J. (2013). Introduction to Pragmatics. West Sussex: Willey-Blackwell

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Cavasso, L., & Taboada, M. (2021). A corpus analysis of online news comments using the Appraisal framework. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies, 4(0), 1. https://doi.org/10.18573/jcads.61

Fajri, B. A., Atmantika, Z. H., & Adhitya, G. N. (2022). An appraisal analysis of Joe Biden's rhetoric of gun control. Rubikon, 9(2), 244. https://doi.org/10.22146/rubikon.v9i2.77904

Fearon, J. D. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of economic growth, 8, 195-222.

Fitriana, K., Gunawan, W., & Sudana, D. (2020). An attitudinal analysis of social actor in Indonesia capital city movement. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.058

Hommerberg, C., & Don, A. (2015). Appraisal and the language of wine appreciation: A critical discussion of the potential of the Appraisal framework as a tool to analyse specialised genres. Functions of Language, 22(2), 161-191.

Jin, J. (2019). Political news discourse analysis based on an attitudinal perspective of the appraisal theory—take the New York Times' report China-DPRK relations as an example. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(10), 1357. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0910.15

Lalljee, M., Brown, L. B., & Ginsburg, G. P. (1984). Attitudes: disposition, behaviour or evaluation?. British journal of social psychology, 23(3), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00634.x

Lee, S. H. (2015). Evaluative stances in persuasive essays by undergraduate students: Focusing on appreciation resources. Text & Talk, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0029

Lestari, Y. A., Tallapessy, A., & Murti, G. H. (2023). Appraisal analysis of the Jakarta Post's news article on the environmental issue. Language Literacy, 7(1), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v7i1.6650

Liu, X., & Yan, X. (2022). A contrastive appraisal analysis of the chairman’s statements in ICBC’s and Citigroup’s corporate social responsibility reports. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6822668

Magfiroh, I., Herdiawan, R. D., & Rofi’i, A. (2021). An appraisal analysis of narrative text from the 11th-grade English textbook. Allure Journal, 1(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.26877/allure.v1i1.9270

Mahrholz, G., Belin, P., & McAleer, P. (2018). A speaker's personality judgements are correlated across differing content and stimulus types. PLOS ONE, 13(10), e0204991. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204991

Marpaung, M. A. (2022). The realization of attitude in online news article: An appraisal analysis. PENDALAS Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(2), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.47006/pendalas.v2i2.102

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.

McKinley, J. (2018). Integrating appraisal theory with possible selves in understanding university EFL writing. System, 78, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.07.002

Moore, D. J., & Harris, W. D. (1996). Affect intensity and the consumer's attitude toward high impact emotional advertising appeals. Journal of advertising, 25(2), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1996.10673498

Munday, J. (2018). A model of appraisal: Spanish interpretations of President Trump’s inaugural address 2017. Perspectives, 26(2), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1388415

Oteíza, T. (2017). The appraisal framework and discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (pp. 481-496). Routledge.

Rohmawati, I. (2016). Appraisal devices are realizing attitudes in Barack Obama’s inaugural speech. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 5(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv5i1859

Ross, A. S., & Caldwell, D. (2020). ‘Going negative’: An appraisal analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter. Language & Communication, 70, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.09.003

Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Harcourt, Brace & World Inc

Sarnoff, I. (1970). Social Attitudes and the Resolution of Motivational Conflict. In M. Jahoda, & N. Warren (Eds.), Attitudes (pp. 279-284). Penguin.

Szczyrbak, M. (2023). Closing argument as multimodal oratory: Insights from the Chauvin trial. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 36(3), 1109-1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09984-z

Van Poucke, M. (2023). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and shaming on TikTok: A multimodal appraisal analysis. Multimodality & Society, 3(2), 97-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795231153955

Zhou, Z. (2023). Analysis of Donald Trump’s Inaugural Speech based on Attitude Within Appraisal Theory. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 4(1), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.54097/jeer.v4i1.10275

Downloads

Published

2024-03-18

How to Cite

Sekarsari, A. A., Prastiwi, Y., & Sutopo, A. (2024). An Appraisal Analysis of Attitude in Joko Widodo’s ASEAN Summit Speeches. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.24738

Issue

Section

Articles