Challenges and Opportunities: A Qualitative Study of EFL Teachers' Digital Proficiency and its Impact on Interactive Language Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25095Keywords:
Students, language, behaviour, thinking, intensity, intercultural, communication, social mediaAbstract
This study investigates the digital proficiency of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers concerning language assessment development. Employing a qualitative phenomenological approach, it explores the subjective experiences and perceptions of EFL teachers engaged in constructing language tests within educational contexts. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three participants, each representing diverse backgrounds in English Language Teaching (ELT). Moreover, thematic analysis was utilized to interpret the collected data systematically. The findings reveal specific challenges encountered by teachers in implementing interactive language assessments, including the identification of appropriate instructional materials, selection of suitable assessment models, and integration of digital tools into teaching methodologies. Moreover, participants suggest that technology can positively impact student engagement, motivation, and collaboration during assessments. By recognizing the continuous nature of language learning and assessment, educators can better tailor their approaches to meet the evolving needs of language learners. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on language assessment practices, highlighting the importance of incorporating digital resources and fostering a supportive learning environment for students.
References
Alarcón, R., Del Pilar Jiménez, E., & De Vicente-Yagüe, M. I. (2020). Development and validation of the DIGIGLO, a tool for assessing the digital competence of educators. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2407–2421. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12919
Armayanti, R. (2019). A Review of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) on Qualitative research. REiLA, 1(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v1i1.2768
Bahrani, T. (2011). Technology as an assessment tool in language learning. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v1n2p295
Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado‐Aranda, L., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
Blikstad‐Balas, M., & Klette, K. (2020b). Still a long way to go. Digital Kompetanse, 15(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-01-05
Brooks, J., & King, N. (2017c). Applied Qualitative Research in Psychology. Red Globe Press.
Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
Chen, C., Liu, H., & Huang, H. (2019). Effects of a mobile game-based English vocabulary learning app on learners’ perceptions and learning performance: A case study of Taiwanese EFL learners. ReCALL, 31(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344018000228
Chigbu, B. I., Ngwevu, V., & Jojo, A. (2023). The effectiveness of innovative pedagogy in the industry 4.0: Educational ecosystem perspective. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100419
Diab, A. a. M. (2019). Using Some Online-Collaborative Learning Tools (Google Docs &Padlet) to Develop Student Teachers’ EFL Creative Writing Skills and Writing Self-Efficacy. Journal of Faculty of Education - Benha University, 30(3), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.21608/jfeb.2019.61360
Dridi, M. A., Radhakrishnan, D., Moser-Mercer, B., & DeBoer, J. (2020). Challenges of blended learning in refugee camps: When internet connectivity fails, human connection succeeds. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4770
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Finch, A. (2002). Authentic Assessment: Implications for EFL performance testing in Korea. Secondary Education Research. 49, 89 – 122
Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 17(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7275/sxbs-0829
Gikandi, J., & Morrow, D. (2015). Designing and implementing peer formative feedback within online learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2015.1058853
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2012). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
Hidayat, D. N., Lee, J. Y., Mason, J., & Khaerudin, T. (2022). Digital technology supporting English learning among Indonesian university students. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00198-8
Holland, J., & Holland, J. J. (2014). Implications of shifting technology in education. TechTrends, 58(3), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0748-3
Janesick, V. J. (2006). Authentic Assessment primer. Peter Lang
Jong, B., & Tan, K. H. (2021). Using Padlet as a technological tool for assessment of students writing skills in online classroom settings. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.411.423
Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N. N. N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003
Kaufmann, K., & Peil, C. (2019). The mobile instant messaging interview (MIMI): Using WhatsApp to enhance self-reporting and explore media usage in situ. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919852392
Keppell, M., & Carless, D. (2006). Learning‐oriented assessment: a technology‐based case study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 13(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940600703944
Lai, C., Jong, B. S., Hsia, Y., & Lin, T. (2020). Applying Concept Map to Game-Base concept Assessment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(06), 159. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i06.12057
Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C., Sumalinog, D. a. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. S. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
Licorish, S. A., Owen, H., Daniel, B. K., & George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0078-8
Nguyen, L. a. T., & Habók, A. (2023). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: A review. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00257-5
Martzoukou, K., Fulton, C., Kostagiolas, P. and Lavranos, C. (2020), "A study of higher education students' self-perceived digital competences for learning and everyday life online participation", Journal of Documentation, 76 (6), 1413-1458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2020-0041
Mintah, J. K. (2003). Authentic Assessment in Physical Education: prevalence of use and perceived impact on students’ Self-Concept, motivation, and skill achievement. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 7(3), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0703_03
Mpofu, F. Y. (2020). Saturation controversy in qualitative research: Complexities and underlying assumptions. A literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1838706
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2006). An agenda for the second generation of qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 1(2), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620500539248
Skantz-Åberg, E., Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Williams, P. (2022). Teachers’ professional digital competence: an overview of conceptualisations in the literature. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2063224
Štofková, Z., Poliaková, A., Štofková, K. R., Malega, P., Krejnus, M., Biňasová, V., & Daneshjo, N. (2022). Digital skills as a significant factor of human resources development. Sustainability, 14(20), 13117. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013117
Zhang, F., Schunn, C. D., Li, W., & Long, M. (2020). Changes in the reliability and validity of peer assessment across the college years. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1724260
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Afra Nadya Putri Insani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
