Critical Thinking in Academic Reading: EFL Students’ Perceptions and Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25096Keywords:
EFL learners, English language study, perceptions, challenges, academic reading, critical thinking skillsAbstract
Academic reading and critical thinking are pivotal in higher education, particularly for university students, including those who are English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. This study explores the perceptions of second-semester English Education students at Yogyakarta State University regarding the interrelationship between academic reading and critical thinking skills. It identifies the challenges they face in this area. The research involved 19 participants and employed a mixed-methods design, utilizing both Likert-scale questionnaires and semi-structured interviews for data collection. The data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results indicate that participants generally hold positive views about their critical thinking and academic reading capabilities across all aspects of Bloom's Taxonomy. The findings suggest a correlation between students proficient in academic reading and those who exhibit strong critical thinking skills. They expressed confidence in their ability to understand, evaluate, and analyze texts. Furthermore, the study reveals that these students face several challenges, such as language complexities, interdisciplinary comprehension issues, and subjective biases, which affect their learning processes in critical thinking and academic reading.
References
Anuar, N., & Sidhu, G. K. (2017). Critical reading skills: A survey of postgraduate students’ perspective of critical reading. Pertanika Journals Social Sciences & Humanities, 25, 163–172.
Anwar, I. W., & Sailuddin, S. P. (2022). Academic reading difficulties in higher education. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i2.4849
Asraf, R. M., Muhamad, A. J., & Supian, N. (2019). Undergraduate critical thinking and reading of academic texts. Religación, 4(15), 74-80. https://revista.religacion.com/index.php/religacion/article/view/277
Baddane, K., & Ennam, A. (2024). Measuring pedagogical transformation: A quantitative analysis of critical thinking integration in literary criticism for heightened student engagement and learning outcomes. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.1.4
Browne, A. (2015). Can people talk together about their practices? Focus groups, humor, and the sensitive dynamics of everyday life. Area, 48(2), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12250
Cansoy, R., Parlar, H., & Polatcan, M. (2018). Teacher candidates’ critical thinking tendencies research in Turkey: A content analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(9), 1974–1980. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060916
Castillo-Martínez, I. M., & Ramí¬rez-Montoya, M. S. (2021). Research competencies to develop academic reading and writing: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.576961
Cheng, Y., & Good, R.L. (2009). L1 glosses: Effects on EFL learners' reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Reading in a foreign language, 21, 119-142.
Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2018) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Genç, G. (2017). The relationship between academic achievement, reading habits and critical thinking dispositions of Turkish tertiary level EFL learners. Education Research Quarterly, 43–73.
Gonzalez, M., & Moore, N. (2020). A comparison of faculty and graduate students’ perceptions of engaging online courses: A mixed-method study. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.223
Hermida, J. (2009). The importance of teaching academic reading skills in First-Year University courses. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1419247
Hirano, E. (2015). “I read; I don’t understand”: Refugees coping with academic reading. ELT Journal, 69(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu068
Howard, P. J., Gorzycki, M., Desa, G., & Allen, D. D. (2018). Academic reading: Comparing students’ and faculty perceptions of its value, practice, and pedagogy. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 48(3), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2018.1472942
Jayanti, F. G. (2016). Reading difficulties: Comparison on students’ and teachers’ perception. Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching, 4(1), 296–301. https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/selt/article/view/6939
Kaiser, E., & Wang, C. (2021). Packaging information as fact versus opinion: Consequences of the (Information-)structural position of subjective adjectives. Discourse Processes, 58(7), 617–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1838196
Karadağ, R. (2014). Primary school teacher candidates’ views towards critical reading skills and perceptions of their competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 889–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.339
Kazemi, A., & Soleimani, N. (2016). On the relationship between EFL teachers’ classroom management approaches and the dominant teaching style: A mixed method study. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2016.20367
Lamanauskas, V. (2021). Writing a scientific article: Focused discussion and rational conclusions. Problems of Education in the 21st century, 79(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.04
Leontopoulou, S. (2020). Measuring well-being in emerging adults: Exploring the PERMA framework for positive youth development. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 25(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.25337
Lopatovska, I., & Sessions, D. (2016). Understanding academic reading in the context of information-seeking. Library Review, 65(8–9), 502–518. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-03-2016-0026
Maguire, M., Reynolds, A. E., & Delahunt, B. (2020). Reading to be: The role of academic reading in emergent academic and professional student identities. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.2.5
McKinley, J. (2015). Critical argument and writer identity: Social constructivism as a theoretical framework for EFL academic writing. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(3), 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2015.1060558
Miller, K., & Merdian, H. (2020). It’s not a waste of time!” academics’ views on the role and function of academic reading: A thematic analysis. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.2.3
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection, and analysis. The European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
Nguyen, H. T. T., & Henderson, A. (2020). Can the reading load be engaging? Connecting the instrumental, critical, and aesthetic in academic reading for student learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.2.6
Phakiti, A., & Li, L. (2011). General academic difficulties and reading and writing difficulties among Asian ESL postgraduate students in TESOL at an Australian University. RELC Journal, 42(3), 227–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688211421417
Samsudin, D., & Hardini, T. I. (2019). The influence of learning styles and metacognitive skills on students’ critical thinking in the context of student creativity program. International Journal of Education, 11(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i2.14750
Sengupta, S. (2002). Developing Academic reading at tertiary level: A longitudinal study tracing conceptual change. The Reading Matrix : an International Online Journal, 2 (1).
Singh, M. K. M. (2014). Challenges in academic reading and overcoming strategies in taught master programmers: A case study of international graduate students in Malaysia. Higher Education Studies, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n4p76
Sohail, S. (2016). Academic reading strategies used by Leeds metropolitan university graduates: A case study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v2i2.442
Stockhausen, L., & Conrick, M. (2002). Making sense of research: A guide for critiquing a paper. In Contemporary Nurse: A journal for the Australian nursing profession (Vol. 14, Issue 1, pp. 38–48). https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.14.1.38
West, J. (2023). Utilizing Bloom’s taxonomy and authentic learning principles to promote preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100620
Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Husna Maab, Safira Fauzia Ramadhanti, Naftalia Fani Payung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
