Teacher-Student Interaction in EFL Classrooms through Creative Problem-Solving: An Application of the Initiation-Response-Feedback Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.26509Keywords:
creative problem solving, pre-service teacher, initiation response feedbackAbstract
Effective teaching relies heavily on solid communication and meaningful interaction between teachers and students. These elements create an environment where students are more engaged and motivated, leading to better learning outcomes. One way to enhance this interaction is through Creative Problem-Solving (CPS), which incorporates creativity into the teaching process. CPS encourages students to think imaginatively, collaborate, and apply knowledge dynamically, fostering a more engaging and interactive classroom environment. This study aims to investigate how Creative Problem-Solving (CPS) facilitates teacher-student interaction patterns by applying the Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) theory in an EFL classroom at a state university in Indonesia. The study involved 46 pre-service teachers, six males and 40 females, all fifth-semester undergraduate students enrolled in the Curriculum and Material Development course. Data collection methods included deep interviews and classroom observations. The research revealed that pre-service teachers faced challenges with CPS projects, especially those involving telecollaboration. However, they valued the lecturer's guidance and feedback, which played a crucial role in helping them overcome these difficulties and complete the tasks. Thus, to maximize the benefits of CPS, lecturers must provide a clear understanding of CPS principles, as it is a relatively new approach for many pre-service teachers. Additionally, encouraging pre-service teachers to seek guidance and actively engage in collaborative activities can enhance their critical thinking and overall learning experience.
References
Alghasab, M., Hardman, J., & Handley, Z. (2019). Teacher-student interaction on wikis: Fostering collaborative learning and writing. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.12.002
Batane, T., & Ngwako, A. (2016). Technology use by pre-service teachers during teaching practice: Are new teachers embracing technology right away in their first teaching experience? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2299
Bremner, N. (2019). From learner-centred to learning-centred: Becoming a ‘hybrid’ practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.06.012
Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., Villarreal, I., & Esteban, S. G. (2018). Can telecollaboration contribute to the TPACK development of pre-service teachers? Technology Pedagogy and Education, 27(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2018.1471000
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Carlgren, T. (2013). Communication, critical thinking, problem-solving: A suggested course for all high school students in the 21st century. Interchange, 44(1–2), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-013-9197-8
Csanadi, A., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ evidence-based reasoning during pedagogical problem-solving: Better together? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00467-4
Havik, T., & Westergård, E. (2019). Do teachers matter? Students’ perceptions of classroom interactions and student engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1577754
Jules, J. E. (2019). From teacher talk to student talk. In Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design book series (pp. 107–139). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9228-0.ch005
Kaplan, D. E. (2019). Creativity in Education: Teaching for creativity development. Psychology, 10(02), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.102012
Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
Li, G., Sun, Z., & Jee, Y. (2019). The more technology, the better. A comparison of teacher-student interaction in high and low technology use elementary EFL classrooms in China. System, 84, 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.003
Li, S. (2022). On the role of teacher-student rapport on English as a Foreign Language students’ well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.822013
Liao, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, H., & Chang, Y. (2018). Infusing creative pedagogy into an English as a foreign language classroom: Learning performance, creativity, and motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.007
Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (2013). Individual differences in second language learning. How Languages are Learned. Oxford University Press
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444818000125
Luo, N., Li, H., Zhao, L., Wu, Z., & Zhang, J. (2022). Promoting student engagement in online learning through harmonious classroom environment. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(5), 541-551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00606-5
Maeng, U., & Lee, S. (2015). EFL teachers’ behavior of using motivational strategies: The case of teaching in the Korean context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.010
McCabe, A., & O’Connor, U. (2013). Student-centred learning: The role and responsibility of the lecturer. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860111
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Okulu, H. Z., & Muslu, N. (2024). Designing a course for pre-service science teachers using ChatGPT: What ChatGPT brings to the table. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2322462
Rustandi, A. (2017). An analysis of IRF (initiation-response-feedback) on classroom interaction in EFL speaking class. EduLite Journal of English Education Literature and Culture, 2(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.2.1.239-250
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press.
Stolz, R. C., Blackmon, A. T., Engerman, K., Tonge, L., & McKayle, C. A. (2022). Poised for creativity: Benefits of exposing undergraduate students to creative problem-solving to moderate change in creative self-efficacy and academic achievement. Journal of Creativity, 32(2), 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100024
Tadesse, A., Lehesvuori, S., Posti-Ahokas, H., & Moate, J. (2023). The learner-centred interactive pedagogy classroom: Its implications for dialogic interaction in Eritrean secondary schools. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101379
Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (1992). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational psychology review, 22, 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Vattøy, K., & Gamlem, S. M. (2020). Teacher–student interactions and feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2019.1707512
Wang, H. (2019). Fostering learner creativity in the English L2 classroom: Application of the creative problem-solving model. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.005
Winstone, N., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Heron, M. (2021). From feedback-as-information to feedback-as-process: a linguistic analysis of the feedback literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1902467
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rani Nur Aini, Dr. Nur Arifah Drajati, M.Pd, Mr. Kristian Adi Putra, Ph.D
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
