Can Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Revolutionize Cadets’ Speaking Skills in Maritime English?

Authors

  • Sunarlia Limbong Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran (PIP) Makassar
  • Novianty Palayukan Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran (PIP) Makassar
  • Egbert Edward Djajasasana Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran (PIP) Makassar
  • Frans Tandibura Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran (PIP) Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.26651

Keywords:

Maritime English, contextual teaching and learning, communication efficiency, ESP

Abstract

Effective English communication is vital in the global maritime industry. Maritime English, a branch of English for Specific Purposes (ESP), addresses the needs of maritime professionals. Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) uses real-life scenarios, making it ideal for vocational training. This means practicing real shipboard situations for maritime cadets, leading to effective learning. This study investigates the effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) on cadets’ speaking skills when learning English for Specific Purposes (ESP) instructional materials. The study applied a quasi-experimental method with a nonequivalent group design, involving 48 cadets from the deck study program at the Merchant Marine Polytechnic of Makassar, Indonesia. The results indicate a significant improvement in the pretest-posttest scores, analyzed using a statistical test with the prerequisite data being normally distributed. The hypothesis test results, with a significance value of 0.000, confirm that there were differences in the speaking skills of the cadets at the Merchant Marine Polytechnic of Makassar after applying the CTL model in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) instructional materials. The findings highlight that the CTL model positively impacts and optimally influences the teaching and learning process in speaking skills when cadets learn ESP materials. This approach increases cadets' confidence and encourages them to be active learners based on their real experiences.

References

Ahmmed, R. (2021). A framework for Maritime English language planning in Bangladeshi maritime education and training institutes. SN Social Sciences, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00188-5

Aichhorn, N., & Puck, J. (2017). “I just don’t feel comfortable speaking English”: Foreign language anxiety as a catalyst for spoken-language barriers in MNCs. International Business Review, 26(4), 749–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.01.004

Apostol-Mates, R., & Barbu, A. (2015). Is Maritime English the key in solving communication problems within multinational crews? International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization, 21(2), 541–544. https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2015-0092

Asrizal, A., Amran, A., Ananda, A., & Festiyed, F. (2018). Effectiveness of adaptive contextual learning model of Integrated Science by integrating digital age literacy on Grade VIII students. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 335, 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/335/1/012067

Chand, G. B. (2021). Challenges faced by Bachelor level students while speaking English. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 6(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v6i1.853

Chen, M., Wang, L., Zou, D., Lin, S., & Xie, H. (2019). Effects of caption and gender on junior high students’ EFL learning from iMap-enhanced contextualized learning. Computers & Education, 140, 103602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103602

Darmuki, A., Andayani, A., Nurkamto, J., & Saddhono, K. (2018). Cooperative, synectics, and CTL learning models toward speaking ability viewed from student’s motivation. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intellectuals’ Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/icigr-17.2018.18

Dirgayasa, I. W. (2014). Survey of English teaching and learning process in maritme education and training in Indonesia: A case study in private MET in Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n7p111

Herbein, E., Golle, J., Tibus, M., Zettler, I., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Putting a speech training program into practice: Its implementation and effects on elementary school children’s public speaking skills and levels of speech anxiety. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.09.003

Ismail, M. R. S., Rizani, M. S., & Rauzilan, M. I. M. (2020). A study on improving Maritime English performance among cadets at maritime universities. Maritime Technology and Research, 2(2), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2020.201687

Jahara, S. F., & Abdelrady, A. H. (2021). Pronunciation problems encountered by EFL learners: An empirical study. Arab World English Journal, 12(4), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no4.14

James, A. J., Schriever, U. G., Jahangiri, S., & Girgin, S. C. (2018). Improving maritime English competence as the cornerstone of safety at sea: a focus on teaching practices to improve maritime communication. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0145-4

Lan, Y. J. (2015). Contextual efl learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language, Learning and Technology, 19(2), 16-31.

Maulidar, K., Gani, S. A., & Samad, I. A. (2019). Teacher’s strategies in teaching speaking for cadets. English Education Journal, 10(1), 80–94. https://doaj.org/article/c3e27a9c55ea46109047c68ab72e6ea6

Merawan, C. T., Hajidin, N., & Duskri, M. (2021). Self-regulated learning through Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1882(1), 012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012087

Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_157_18

Mönnigmann, B., & Čulić-Viskota, A. (2017). Standardised English language proficiency testing for seafarers. Transactions on Maritime Science, 6(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v06.n02.007

Muliani, M., & Sumarsono, D. (2019). Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) approach in speaking materials for students’ 21st century skill: Does it have any effect? Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching), 6(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v6i2.2362

Navarro, J. D., Garbin, Z. Z., Agena, E. M., & Garcia, O. B. (2015). Maritime students’ English proficiency and their feedback on instructional materials. Asia Pacific Journal of Maritime Education, 1(1), 63–81. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=10339

Pašalić, M., & Plančić, B. (2018). Issues affecting selection and evaluation of ESP teaching materials. Transactions on Maritime Science, 7(02), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v07.n02.011

Sartini, S. (2020). Kahoot in maritime English teaching: Its impact on nautical science cadet’s oral reproduction and vocabulary. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(1), 41-51

Savaşçı, M. (2014). Why are some students reluctant to use L2 in EFL speaking classes? An action research at tertiary level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2682–2686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.635

Shantia, E., & Lufri, L. (2021). The influence of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) learning model on 21st century skills of students in Class X Biology learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 6(11), 1792. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i11.15147

Stratton, S. J. (2019). Quasi-Experimental design (Pre-Test and Post-Test studies) in prehospital and disaster research. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 34(6), 573–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x19005053

Sulistyo, T., & Lutviana, R. (2023). How far can I go? Video project-based learning as a meaning-making process to promote students’ speaking proficiency. Voices of English Language Education Society, 7(2), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i2.21141

Valle, A. B. (2011). The Language of Seafaring: Standardized conventions and discursive features in speech communications. International Journal of English Studies (IJES), 11(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.11.1.137091

Yenkimaleki, M., & Van Heuven, V. J. (2019). The relative contribution of computer assisted prosody training vs. instructor based prosody teaching in developing speaking skills by interpreter trainees: An experimental study. Speech Communication, 107, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2019.01.006

Yusyac, R., Muslem, A., & Yasin, B. (2021). Using contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach to improve students’ speaking ability. English Education Journal, 12(3), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v12i3.19189

Zhang, Y., & Cole, C. (2018). Maritime English as a code-tailored ESP: Genre-based curriculum development as a way out . Ibérica, (35), 145–170.

Zulirfan, Z., Rahmad, M., Yennita, Y., Kurnia, N., & Hadi, M. S. (2018). Science process skills and attitudes toward science of lower secondary students of Merbau island: A preliminary study on the development of maritime-based contextual science learning media. Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.2.2.p.90-99

Downloads

Published

2024-08-26

How to Cite

Limbong, S., Palayukan, N., Djajasasana, E. E., & Tandibura, F. (2024). Can Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Revolutionize Cadets’ Speaking Skills in Maritime English?. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.26651

Issue

Section

Articles