Inspiring Through Interaction: The Impact of Teachers' Verbal and Non-Verbal Communication in EFL Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.26821Keywords:
Verbal communication, Non-verbal communication, students' motivationAbstract
Effective verbal communication, including clear explanations and constructive feedback, ensures that students comprehend the material and feel supported. Nonverbal communication, such as gestures, facial expressions, and eye contact, significantly contributes to sustaining student engagement and motivation. This research examines teachers' various verbal and nonverbal communication techniques in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classes and explores their impact on student motivation. The study involved two teachers and 57 students from senior high schools in Indonesia, employing a phenomenological qualitative approach. Data collection methods included observation checklists, interviews, and questionnaires. The analysis revealed that teachers utilized seven distinct verbal communication methods—lecturing, questioning, giving directions, providing praise and encouragement, and offering feedback—and seven nonverbal methods, including eye contact, hand movements, physical proximity, facial expressions, physical appearance, and chronemics (the strategic use of time). Among these, students rated suggestions, praise, and encouragement as the most motivating verbal interactions, while eye contact emerged as the most influential nonverbal factor. These findings underscore the need for targeted teacher training in these communication strategies to foster a more engaging and motivating learning environment, thereby enhancing student learning outcomes in Indonesian EFL contexts.
References
Agricola, B. T., Prins, F. J., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2019). Impact of feedback request forms and verbal feedback on higher education students’ feedback perception, self-efficacy, and motivation. Assessment in Education, 27(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2019.1688764
Amerstorfer, C. M., & Von Münster-Kistner, C. F. (2021). Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
Ayuningsih, A. A., Mahmud, M., Salija, K., & Muhayyang, M. (2022). Teachers’ paralanguage in classroom interaction. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v15i1.14127
Bambaeeroo, F., & Shokrpour, N. (2017). The impact of the teachers' non-verbal communication on success in teaching. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 5(2), 51–59.
Beege, M., Ninaus, M., Schneider, S., Nebel, S., Schlemmel, J., Weidenmüller, J., Moeller, K., & Rey, G. D. (2020). Investigating the effects of beat and deictic gestures of a lecturer in educational videos. Computers and Education/Computers & Education, 156, 103955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103955
Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The Teacher's view. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584
Cekaite, A. (2016). Touch as social control: Haptic organization of attention in adult-child interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 92, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.003
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). When teachers learn how to provide classroom structure in an autonomy-supportive way: Benefits to teachers and their students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 90, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103004
Dargue, N., & Sweller, N. (2019). Learning stories through gesture: Gesture’s effects on child and adult narrative comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09505-0
Davis, R. O. (2018). The impact of pedagogical agent gesturing in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 24, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.05.002
Dicke, T., Elling, J., Schmeck, A., & Leutner, D. (2015). Reducing reality shock: The effects of classroom management skills training on beginning teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.013
Duta, N., Panisoara, G., & Panisoara, I. (2015). The effective communication in teaching. Diagnostic study regarding the academic learning motivation of students. Procedia: Social & Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1007–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.064
Flynn, S. V., & Korcuska, J. S. (2018). Grounded theory research design: An investigation into practices and procedures. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 9(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2017.1403849
Frenzel, A. C., Daniels, L., & Burić, I. (2021). Teacher emotions in the classroom and their implications for students. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1985501
Jakonen, T., & Evnitskaya, N. (2020). The Teacher smiles as an interactional and pedagogical resource in the classroom. Journal of Pragmatics, 163, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.005
Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
Kennedy, M. (2015). Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115614617
Lin, Y., Durbin, J. M., & Rancer, A. S. (2016). Perceived instructor argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and classroom communication climate about student state motivation and math anxiety. Communication Education, 66(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1245427
Liu, S. (2022). Toward the role of L2 enjoyment in EFL students’ academic motivation and engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.822588
Martikainen, J. (2019). How students categorize teachers based on visual cues: implications of nonverbal communication for classroom management. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595713
Matsumoto, Y. (2018). Challenging moments as opportunities to learn: The role of nonverbal interactional resources in dealing with conflicts in English as a lingua franca classroom interactions. Linguistics and Education, 48, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.08.007
Moskowitz, G. (1971). Interaction analysis-a new modern language for supervisors. Foreign Language Annals, 5(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1971.tb00682.x
Nguyen, T. D., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2016). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359
Simonds, C. J., & Cooper, P. J. (2013). Communication for the classroom teacher: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson.
Sogunro, O. A. (2014). Motivating factors for adult learners in higher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p22
Van Der Veen, C., De Mey, L., Van Kruistum, C., & Van Oers, B. (2017). The effect of productive classroom talk and metacommunication on young children’s oral communicative competence and subject matter knowledge: An intervention study in early childhood education. Learning and Instruction, 48, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.06.001
Wahyuni, A. (2018). The power of verbal and nonverbal communication in learning. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intellectuals’ Global Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.2991/icigr-17.2018.19
Wang, W., & Loewen, S. (2015). Nonverbal behavior and corrective feedback in nine ESL university-level classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815577239
Xie, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). A Conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490
Zakirman, Z., Lufri, L., & Khairani, K. (2019). Factors influencing the use of lecture methods in learning activities: Teacher perspective. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Innovation in Education (ICoIE, 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icoie-18.2019.2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Riki Ruswandi, Muhamad Arief, Novitasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
